PFD report

Rhian Margaret Roberts · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Jul 2021•North Wales (East and Central)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
12

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Delays in sharing learning from adverse incidents
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably disseminate contextualised safety learning to relevant staff
  2. Delays in investigating adverse incidents
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
  3. Delays in implementing actions following adverse incidents
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to implement identified safety actions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Update, approve and activate the SOP for telephoning reports and life-threatening results, and discuss it in team briefings.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 July 2021.
  2. Action

    Require timely completion and weekly governance tracking of investigations, with advance approval for extensions.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 July 2021.
  3. Action

    Upload approved serious-incident actions to Datix, require completion evidence, measure timely closure and audit evidence quality.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 July 2021.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in sharing learning from adverse incidents

Wider context from the report

“3. I am concerned that the continual delays in investigating adverse incidents, sharing learning and implementing actions following the same, create risks to patient safety. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably disseminate contextualised safety learning to relevant staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in investigating adverse incidents

Wider context from the report

“3. I am concerned that the continual delays in investigating adverse incidents, sharing learning and implementing actions following the same, create risks to patient safety. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in implementing actions following adverse incidents

Wider context from the report

“3. I am concerned that the continual delays in investigating adverse incidents, sharing learning and implementing actions following the same, create risks to patient safety. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to implement identified safety actions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to verify completion of requested toxicology screening or record why it was not undertaken

Wider context from the report

“1. On arrival at ICU the clerking-in doctor requested a toxicology screen to include paracetamol and salicylate levels (notwithstanding that blood tests to include this were already in hand) and there was no evidence available at the inquest to establish whether or not the toxicology screen requested by the doctor was undertaken and if not why not. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to approve the updated procedure for direct communication of life-threatening blood results

Wider context from the report

“2. An internal investigation by the health board following Mrs Roberts’ death rightly established that action needed to be taken to update or modify the SOP for communicating of life-threatening blood results directly with clinical areas and an action plan indicated that this would be completed by the 30th of June 2021. At the time of the inquest on the 13th of July, the proposed update remained in draft form only and had not yet been approved. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update, approve and activate the SOP for telephoning reports and life-threatening results, and discuss it in team briefings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for telephoning reports and results was updated, approved and active as of the 20th July 2021 and discussed in the team brief meeting.”

Source location

2021-0242-Betsi-Cadwaladr-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 15 July 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require timely completion and weekly governance tracking of investigations, with advance approval for extensions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Depending on the complexity of the incident, investigations are required to be completed within 25 to 45 working days. Any extensions must be requested in advance from the Associate Director of Quality Assurance. The progress of the investigation is tracked via a weekly governance report that is scrutinised in directorate weekly governance meetings.”

Source location

2021-0242-Betsi-Cadwaladr-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 15 July 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Upload approved serious-incident actions to Datix, require completion evidence, measure timely closure and audit evidence quality.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All actions arising from a serious incident investigation will be uploaded to the Datix incident system on final approval of the investigation by the Corporate Patient Safety Team. Services will upload evidence of completion when closing actions. The timely closure of actions will become a performance measure and audits will take place of submitted evidence to ensure quality and learning.”

Source location

2021-0242-Betsi-Cadwaladr-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 15 July 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and operate learning-sharing channels, including a portal, lessons-on-a-page, digital dissemination and monthly learning events.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, we are strengthening the sharing of learning by developing a learning portal, lessons on a page, digital sharing of learning and a monthly lessons learned event. To support the new processes, a comprehensive training passport is being finalised. This passport consists of modular courses to develop skills as an investigating officer or senior reviewer. A mentor scheme, drop in support sessions and an ongoing community of practice will also be launched. The application of human factors skills will be a key element of this training.”

Source location

2021-0242-Betsi-Cadwaladr-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 15 July 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a new serious-incident process with daily review, executive oversight, rapid learning escalation, appointed investigators and senior reviewers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A new process to support the services to deliver timely investigations was commenced in April 2021. This process will improve performance and ensure investigations are robust, proportionate and timely.”

Source location

2021-0242-Betsi-Cadwaladr-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 15 July 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. 1

    Develop results-management desktop application and dashboard capability alongside the digital health records transition programme.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 July 2021.
  2. 2

    Strengthen patient and family involvement by agreeing investigation terms, participation and presentation of findings at investigation commencement.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 July 2021.
  3. 3

    Mandate recording both the name and role of the person receiving telephoned results.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 July 2021.
  4. 4

    Review the procedure for mitigating risks from failure to act on diagnostic results and update, approve and activate it as required.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 15 July 2021.
  5. 5

    Finalise a modular training passport for investigating officers and senior reviewers, including human factors skills.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 15 July 2021.
  6. 6

    Add verbal communication of specific requirements and management-plan checks to intensive care safety practice.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 July 2021.
  7. 7

    Launch mentoring, drop-in support and an ongoing community of practice for serious-incident investigation staff.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 July 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop results-management desktop application and dashboard capability alongside the digital health records transition programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A business case for a desktop application and dashboard has also been approved in principle to improve the assurance for the management of results across the Health Board. This is a key development to enable us to safely rely on notifications and electronically sign off results. Results management will be delivered alongside the Digital Health Records project under the Patient Record Transition Programme, which grounds itself in the space of improving patient care through the safe transition from paper to digital reports.”

Source location

2021-0242-Betsi-Cadwaladr-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 15 July 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen patient and family involvement by agreeing investigation terms, participation and presentation of findings at investigation commencement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The involvement of patients or their families will be strengthened. It is expected that the investigator and senior reviewer contact the patient or family at the commencement of an investigation to agree the terms of reference, agree their level of involvement in the investigation and how they wish the findings to be presented.”

Source location

2021-0242-Betsi-Cadwaladr-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 15 July 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Mandate recording both the name and role of the person receiving telephoned results.

Verbatim wording from the response

“An annual audit is undertaken on the telephoning of results, which monitors compliance with phone log record keeping. Historically we have only asked for staff to record the name of the person taking the results, however following this incident we will mandate that staff record the name and role of the individual taking the results.”

Source location

2021-0242-Betsi-Cadwaladr-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 15 July 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the procedure for mitigating risks from failure to act on diagnostic results and update, approve and activate it as required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to this, the current procedure to mitigate risks due to failure to act on diagnostic results (MD23) has been discussed in the ‘Results Management Project Board’ chaired by the Interim Secondary Care Medical Director Dr Gary Francis. The project board are reviewing the procedure with a timescale to be updated as required, approved and active by the 1st October 2021.”

Source location

2021-0242-Betsi-Cadwaladr-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 15 July 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Finalise a modular training passport for investigating officers and senior reviewers, including human factors skills.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, we are strengthening the sharing of learning by developing a learning portal, lessons on a page, digital sharing of learning and a monthly lessons learned event. To support the new processes, a comprehensive training passport is being finalised. This passport consists of modular courses to develop skills as an investigating officer or senior reviewer. A mentor scheme, drop in support sessions and an ongoing community of practice will also be launched. The application of human factors skills will be a key element of this training.”

Source location

2021-0242-Betsi-Cadwaladr-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 15 July 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add verbal communication of specific requirements and management-plan checks to intensive care safety practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following this incident, it was added to the Intensive Care Unit (ITU) safety brief for 2 weeks that the doctors must verbally communicate anything specific required. The Nurses have also been informed that they must check the management plans if they have been away from their patient e.g. for a break, as an additional measure to reduce the risk of missing something that has occurred in their absence.”

Source location

2021-0242-Betsi-Cadwaladr-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 15 July 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch mentoring, drop-in support and an ongoing community of practice for serious-incident investigation staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, we are strengthening the sharing of learning by developing a learning portal, lessons on a page, digital sharing of learning and a monthly lessons learned event. To support the new processes, a comprehensive training passport is being finalised. This passport consists of modular courses to develop skills as an investigating officer or senior reviewer. A mentor scheme, drop in support sessions and an ongoing community of practice will also be launched. The application of human factors skills will be a key element of this training.”

Source location

2021-0242-Betsi-Cadwaladr-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 15 July 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026