PFD report

Marcus Dale Hamilton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Jan 2018•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to provide sufficient maintenance medication for extended travel
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide sufficient maintenance medication for extended travel

Wider context from the report

“For a number of years MDH was on a maintenance programme with MXL, which he received on a 28 days prescription. In December 2015 MDH informed GMMH that he was taking a long trip of 51 days, to Goa, India. MDH was advised that he could only have a 28 day prescription of MXL to take with him. He was only given a 28 day prescription along with the necessary documentation for travelling with the drug. In discussion with the witness from GMMH (MDH’s Recovery Worker) regarding the fact that MDH would clearly run out of his prescription maintenance MXL part way through his holiday the answer I received was that there were drugs in India and MDH would be able to obtain some more MXL. The witness accepted that it could not be certain that MDH (or any other service user) would be able to obtain their maintenance drug (MXL or other) and that such MXL that MDH managed to get hold of would probably have been from the illicit drug market. The same applying to any other service user for whatever maintenance drug. Whilst I accept that what was said does not likely represent GMMH policy what the witness was telling me was, in fact, the reality of the situation created by GMMHs policy/protocol. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.