Dave Yola Onawelo · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Aug 2024•East London

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to identify critically ill patients with high-risk pre-existing comorbidities
  2. Lack of compassion in emergency department care
  3. Patient congestion in emergency departments

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Department of Health and Social Care

    Complete an independent investigation into NHS performance and its challenges.

  2. Department of Health and Social Care

    Use the investigation findings in government work on a 10-year plan to reform the NHS.

  3. Department of Health and Social Care

    Return NHS services to safe operational waiting-time standards.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Department of Health and Social Care

    Local care concerns are assigned to Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust, which is responsible for responding and taking local improvement steps.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify critically ill patients with high-risk pre-existing comorbidities

Wider context from the report

“A. The Trust failed to adequately identify a critically ill patient with a pre-existing co-morbidity, sickle cell anaemia, that carried with it a high risk of acute deterioration. Earlier introduction of fluid resuscitation, blood transfusion and i/v antibiotics is likely to have resulted in a non-fatal outcome. Factors in the emergency department including, patient congestion, over-reliance on the NEWS algorithm and a lack of compassion and clinical curiosity contributed to the outcome. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of compassion in emergency department care

Wider context from the report

“A. The Trust failed to adequately identify a critically ill patient with a pre-existing co-morbidity, sickle cell anaemia, that carried with it a high risk of acute deterioration. Earlier introduction of fluid resuscitation, blood transfusion and i/v antibiotics is likely to have resulted in a non-fatal outcome. Factors in the emergency department including, patient congestion, over-reliance on the NEWS algorithm and a lack of compassion and clinical curiosity contributed to the outcome. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Patient congestion in emergency departments

Wider context from the report

“A. The Trust failed to adequately identify a critically ill patient with a pre-existing co-morbidity, sickle cell anaemia, that carried with it a high risk of acute deterioration. Earlier introduction of fluid resuscitation, blood transfusion and i/v antibiotics is likely to have resulted in a non-fatal outcome. Factors in the emergency department including, patient congestion, over-reliance on the NEWS algorithm and a lack of compassion and clinical curiosity contributed to the outcome. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clinical curiosity in emergency department assessment

Wider context from the report

“A. The Trust failed to adequately identify a critically ill patient with a pre-existing co-morbidity, sickle cell anaemia, that carried with it a high risk of acute deterioration. Earlier introduction of fluid resuscitation, blood transfusion and i/v antibiotics is likely to have resulted in a non-fatal outcome. Factors in the emergency department including, patient congestion, over-reliance on the NEWS algorithm and a lack of compassion and clinical curiosity contributed to the outcome. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Over-reliance on the NEWS algorithm in clinical assessment

Wider context from the report

“A. The Trust failed to adequately identify a critically ill patient with a pre-existing co-morbidity, sickle cell anaemia, that carried with it a high risk of acute deterioration. Earlier introduction of fluid resuscitation, blood transfusion and i/v antibiotics is likely to have resulted in a non-fatal outcome. Factors in the emergency department including, patient congestion, over-reliance on the NEWS algorithm and a lack of compassion and clinical curiosity contributed to the outcome. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable algorithmic triage of unwell patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete an independent investigation into NHS performance and its challenges.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Turning to your concerns on patient congestion and the pressures on the NHS more generally. This government is committed to returning NHS services to the safe operational waiting time standards set out in the NHS Constitution. In doing so, we will be honest about the challenges facing the health service and serious about tackling them. As a first step, the Health Secretary ordered an independent investigation of NHS performance to provide an assessment of the issues and challenges it faces. This reported on 12th September 2024 and the investigation’s findings will feed into the government’s work on a 10-year plan to radically reform the NHS and build a health service that is fit for the future.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 1 · response
Published 30 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use the investigation findings in government work on a 10-year plan to reform the NHS.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Turning to your concerns on patient congestion and the pressures on the NHS more generally. This government is committed to returning NHS services to the safe operational waiting time standards set out in the NHS Constitution. In doing so, we will be honest about the challenges facing the health service and serious about tackling them. As a first step, the Health Secretary ordered an independent investigation of NHS performance to provide an assessment of the issues and challenges it faces. This reported on 12th September 2024 and the investigation’s findings will feed into the government’s work on a 10-year plan to radically reform the NHS and build a health service that is fit for the future.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 1 · response
Published 30 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Return NHS services to safe operational waiting-time standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Turning to your concerns on patient congestion and the pressures on the NHS more generally. This government is committed to returning NHS services to the safe operational waiting time standards set out in the NHS Constitution. In doing so, we will be honest about the challenges facing the health service and serious about tackling them. As a first step, the Health Secretary ordered an independent investigation of NHS performance to provide an assessment of the issues and challenges it faces. This reported on 12th September 2024 and the investigation’s findings will feed into the government’s work on a 10-year plan to radically reform the NHS and build a health service that is fit for the future.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 1 · response
Published 30 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local care concerns are assigned to Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust, which is responsible for responding and taking local improvement steps.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Government is clear that patients should expect and receive the highest standard of service and care from the NHS. You have raised the concerns about the care Mr Onawelo received directly with the responsible NHS body, the Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust. I understand the trust will be responding to you directly on the steps they are taking locally; this includes action to help improve the awareness and care provided in the emergency department for patients with sickle cell anaemia, and action to increase the number of nurses to help support increased patient demand in the emergency department.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 1 · response
Published 30 August 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026