PFD report

Damion Stanley Joseph Henson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 Dec 2013•South and East Cumbria

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to ensure appropriate placement and control of drug users in the homeless residence
  2. Lack of 24-hour supervision at the premises
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure appropriate placement and control of drug users in the homeless residence

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that this is the second or third death at these premises and it seems to me that the death occurred, at least in part, because the property was not supervised 24 hours a day. I understand that the residence is for homeless people but by default some drug users have been placed there and unfortunately on occasions these drug users introduce other drug users into the property out of hours with risks to all those who are present. The address is not a drug rehabilitation unit but is a homeless unit but in the present way that it is being used, it appears to me that 24 hours supervision would be preferable. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of 24-hour supervision at the premises

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that this is the second or third death at these premises and it seems to me that the death occurred, at least in part, because the property was not supervised 24 hours a day. I understand that the residence is for homeless people but by default some drug users have been placed there and unfortunately on occasions these drug users introduce other drug users into the property out of hours with risks to all those who are present. The address is not a drug rehabilitation unit but is a homeless unit but in the present way that it is being used, it appears to me that 24 hours supervision would be preferable. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026