PFD report

Sam MOLYNEUX · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 13 Sep 2017•Liverpool and the Wirral

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to place prisoners at risk of suicide or self-harm on an ACCT
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systemsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes
  2. Lack of anti-barricade doors in some prison wings
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate emergency access during barricade incidentsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable emergency cell-entry arrangements in prisons
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Ensure the revised ACCT form and accompanying policy direct staff to consider emergency access, including anti-barricade doors, when locating prisoners on ACCT.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 September 2017.
  2. Action

    Include emergency-access and anti-barricade-door considerations in training for ACCT case managers.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 September 2017.
  3. Action

    Review the ACCT form and safer custody policy to address emergency access and anti-barricade doors in prisoner-location decisions.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 13 September 2017.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to place prisoners at risk of suicide or self-harm on an ACCT

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the inquest it became apparent that in old prisons not all wings have been adapted to have anti-barricade doors. In this case Mr Molyneux had barricaded his door and this delayed prison staff gaining access to him during a Code Blue Situation. He was not on an ACCT but perhaps should have been given his threats of suicide and self-harm articulated by him in a letter to a Governor on an adjudication the day before his death. Local directions in the Prison during the inquest have addressed this situation in HMP Liverpool at Walton. That said HM Prison and Probation service might wish to consider amending “Management of Prisoners at risk of harm to self, to others and from others (Safer Custody)” to include consideration of where reasonably practicable avoiding locating prisoners behind a door which is not designed to circumvent barricading. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems; Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of anti-barricade doors in some prison wings

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the inquest it became apparent that in old prisons not all wings have been adapted to have anti-barricade doors. In this case Mr Molyneux had barricaded his door and this delayed prison staff gaining access to him during a Code Blue Situation. He was not on an ACCT but perhaps should have been given his threats of suicide and self-harm articulated by him in a letter to a Governor on an adjudication the day before his death. Local directions in the Prison during the inquest have addressed this situation in HMP Liverpool at Walton. That said HM Prison and Probation service might wish to consider amending “Management of Prisoners at risk of harm to self, to others and from others (Safer Custody)” to include consideration of where reasonably practicable avoiding locating prisoners behind a door which is not designed to circumvent barricading. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate emergency access during barricade incidents; Unreliable emergency cell-entry arrangements in prisons.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure the revised ACCT form and accompanying policy direct staff to consider emergency access, including anti-barricade doors, when locating prisoners on ACCT.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Wherever possible, we should avoid using such cells to accommodate prisoners identified as being at risk of self-harm or suicide. As you know, the ACCT process includes consideration by the case review team of the most appropriate location for the prisoner. Both the design of the ACCT form and the content of PSI 64/2011 Safer Custody are currently under review, and we will ensure that the revised version of the form and accompanying policy direct staff to have regard to the issue of emergency access – including the presence of an anti-barricade door – when making decisions about the location of a prisoner on an ACCT. We will also include this in the training that is provided for ACCT case managers.”

Source location

2017-0340-Response-by-HM-Prison-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 13 September 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include emergency-access and anti-barricade-door considerations in training for ACCT case managers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Wherever possible, we should avoid using such cells to accommodate prisoners identified as being at risk of self-harm or suicide. As you know, the ACCT process includes consideration by the case review team of the most appropriate location for the prisoner. Both the design of the ACCT form and the content of PSI 64/2011 Safer Custody are currently under review, and we will ensure that the revised version of the form and accompanying policy direct staff to have regard to the issue of emergency access – including the presence of an anti-barricade door – when making decisions about the location of a prisoner on an ACCT. We will also include this in the training that is provided for ACCT case managers.”

Source location

2017-0340-Response-by-HM-Prison-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 13 September 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the ACCT form and safer custody policy to address emergency access and anti-barricade doors in prisoner-location decisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Wherever possible, we should avoid using such cells to accommodate prisoners identified as being at risk of self-harm or suicide. As you know, the ACCT process includes consideration by the case review team of the most appropriate location for the prisoner. Both the design of the ACCT form and the content of PSI 64/2011 Safer Custody are currently under review, and we will ensure that the revised version of the form and accompanying policy direct staff to have regard to the issue of emergency access – including the presence of an anti-barricade door – when making decisions about the location of a prisoner on an ACCT. We will also include this in the training that is provided for ACCT case managers.”

Source location

2017-0340-Response-by-HM-Prison-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 13 September 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026