PFD report

Shane Luke West · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Jul 2023•Swansea and Neath Port Talbot

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to account for respiratory compromise when administering laxatives
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely treatment for constipation and impacted faeces
  2. Failure to closely monitor laxative treatment to ensure safe dosages
  3. Risk of further respiratory-function loss from abdominal distension
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Remind medication prescribers to select, dispense and administer medicines correctly under NICE and BNF guidance, reinforcing safe maximum-dose awareness and pharmacist dosage scrutiny.

    Stated by Swansea Bay University Local Health BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 July 2023.
  2. Action

    Implement the Hospital Electronic Prescribing and Administration of Medicines system at Morriston Hospital.

    Stated by Swansea Bay University Local Health BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 July 2023.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to account for respiratory compromise when administering laxatives

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that in cases involving patients with learning disabilities (who commonly suffer from chronic constipation) the management of laxative treatment was not monitored closely enough to ensure a safe dosage of laxatives. 1. There was a contradiction between the nursing notes and the prescription charts as to the amount of laxatives administered on the 15th and 16th of August 2018. 2. Shane was known to hide his physical condition on questioning due to his learning disabilities and saying what he thought people wanted to hear. As such it was difficult for staff to get a true picture of Shane's condition. 3. Shane had ongoing respiratory compromise due to his abdominal distension pressing against his diaphragm therefore further distention posed a risk of further loss of respiratory function. 4. It was not clear whether medical professionals appreciated this risk and whether the administering of the laxatives ought to be staggered to allow Shane to receive the prescribed dose but not to the extent of overloading his already distended abdomen with fluid ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely treatment for constipation and impacted faeces.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to closely monitor laxative treatment to ensure safe dosages

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that in cases involving patients with learning disabilities (who commonly suffer from chronic constipation) the management of laxative treatment was not monitored closely enough to ensure a safe dosage of laxatives. 1. There was a contradiction between the nursing notes and the prescription charts as to the amount of laxatives administered on the 15th and 16th of August 2018. 2. Shane was known to hide his physical condition on questioning due to his learning disabilities and saying what he thought people wanted to hear. As such it was difficult for staff to get a true picture of Shane's condition. 3. Shane had ongoing respiratory compromise due to his abdominal distension pressing against his diaphragm therefore further distention posed a risk of further loss of respiratory function. 4. It was not clear whether medical professionals appreciated this risk and whether the administering of the laxatives ought to be staggered to allow Shane to receive the prescribed dose but not to the extent of overloading his already distended abdomen with fluid ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Risk of further respiratory-function loss from abdominal distension

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that in cases involving patients with learning disabilities (who commonly suffer from chronic constipation) the management of laxative treatment was not monitored closely enough to ensure a safe dosage of laxatives. 1. There was a contradiction between the nursing notes and the prescription charts as to the amount of laxatives administered on the 15th and 16th of August 2018. 2. Shane was known to hide his physical condition on questioning due to his learning disabilities and saying what he thought people wanted to hear. As such it was difficult for staff to get a true picture of Shane's condition. 3. Shane had ongoing respiratory compromise due to his abdominal distension pressing against his diaphragm therefore further distention posed a risk of further loss of respiratory function. 4. It was not clear whether medical professionals appreciated this risk and whether the administering of the laxatives ought to be staggered to allow Shane to receive the prescribed dose but not to the extent of overloading his already distended abdomen with fluid ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Difficulty obtaining an accurate clinical picture from patients with learning disabilities

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that in cases involving patients with learning disabilities (who commonly suffer from chronic constipation) the management of laxative treatment was not monitored closely enough to ensure a safe dosage of laxatives. 1. There was a contradiction between the nursing notes and the prescription charts as to the amount of laxatives administered on the 15th and 16th of August 2018. 2. Shane was known to hide his physical condition on questioning due to his learning disabilities and saying what he thought people wanted to hear. As such it was difficult for staff to get a true picture of Shane's condition. 3. Shane had ongoing respiratory compromise due to his abdominal distension pressing against his diaphragm therefore further distention posed a risk of further loss of respiratory function. 4. It was not clear whether medical professionals appreciated this risk and whether the administering of the laxatives ought to be staggered to allow Shane to receive the prescribed dose but not to the extent of overloading his already distended abdomen with fluid ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete clinical history-taking.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain consistent records of laxative administration

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that in cases involving patients with learning disabilities (who commonly suffer from chronic constipation) the management of laxative treatment was not monitored closely enough to ensure a safe dosage of laxatives. 1. There was a contradiction between the nursing notes and the prescription charts as to the amount of laxatives administered on the 15th and 16th of August 2018. 2. Shane was known to hide his physical condition on questioning due to his learning disabilities and saying what he thought people wanted to hear. As such it was difficult for staff to get a true picture of Shane's condition. 3. Shane had ongoing respiratory compromise due to his abdominal distension pressing against his diaphragm therefore further distention posed a risk of further loss of respiratory function. 4. It was not clear whether medical professionals appreciated this risk and whether the administering of the laxatives ought to be staggered to allow Shane to receive the prescribed dose but not to the extent of overloading his already distended abdomen with fluid ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind medication prescribers to select, dispense and administer medicines correctly under NICE and BNF guidance, reinforcing safe maximum-dose awareness and pharmacist dosage scrutiny.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action 3.1: All staff that prescribe medications are to be reminded that the correct drug needs to be selected, dispensed, and administered in line with National Institute for Health & Care Excellence (NICE) and British National Formulary (BNF) Guidelines.”

Source location

Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
Page 4 · response
Published 28 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the Hospital Electronic Prescribing and Administration of Medicines system at Morriston Hospital.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action 1.2: Swansea Bay University Health Board is currently implementing a Hospital Electronic Prescribing and Administration of Medicines (HEPMA) system.”

Source location

Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Develop and implement a multidisciplinary standard operating procedure for managing patients with complex needs after emergency admission.

    Stated by Swansea Bay University Local Health BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 July 2023.
  2. 2

    Remind medication prescribers to report adverse medication reactions through the Yellow Card System.

    Stated by Swansea Bay University Local Health BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 July 2023.
  3. 3

    Review Learning Disabilities training programmes to assess their fitness for purpose and accessibility to staff.

    Stated by Swansea Bay University Local Health BoardStatus unclearThe respondent did not make the status of this action clear when they made their response on 28 July 2023.
  4. 4

    Amend the Serious Incident strategy meeting template to ask explicitly whether medication was involved in the incident.

    Stated by Swansea Bay University Local Health BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 July 2023.
  5. 5

    Undertake and present a risk assessment of specialist Learning Disabilities nursing provision at Morriston Hospital for risk-register consideration.

    Stated by Swansea Bay University Local Health BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 July 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and implement a multidisciplinary standard operating procedure for managing patients with complex needs after emergency admission.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action 2.1: Development and implementation of a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the multi-disciplinary management of patients with complex needs following an emergency admission to acute hospital care.”

Source location

Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 28 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind medication prescribers to report adverse medication reactions through the Yellow Card System.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action 3.2: All staff prescribing medications to be reminded of the importance of reporting adverse reactions to medication (Yellow Card System)”

Source location

Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
Page 4 · response
Published 28 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review Learning Disabilities training programmes to assess their fitness for purpose and accessibility to staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action 2.3: Review of current Learning Disabilities training programmes to ensure fitness for purpose and are accessible to staff.”

Source location

Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 28 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the Serious Incident strategy meeting template to ask explicitly whether medication was involved in the incident.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action 1.1: Amend the health board’s Serious Incident strategy meeting template to include an explicit question on whether medication (prescribed and/or administered) was a feature within the incident.”

Source location

Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake and present a risk assessment of specialist Learning Disabilities nursing provision at Morriston Hospital for risk-register consideration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action 2.2: Risk assessment to be undertaken on the provision of specialist Learning Disabilities nursing resource at Morriston Hospital to support compliance of Regulation 28 Report (issued July 2023)”

Source location

Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 28 July 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026