PFD report

Arlo River Phoenix Lambert · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Jul 2024•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to capture early reflective accounts from key staff
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
  2. Failure of the Antepartum Haemorrhage guideline to convey urgency and account for occult blood loss
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe management of antepartum haemorrhage
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Disseminate the ratified Antepartum Haemorrhage guideline changes to maternity staff through email and shift handovers, with read-and-understood acknowledgements.

    Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 4 July 2024.
  2. Action

    Implement a Trust-wide system, templates, guidance, staff engagement, governance, and review prompts for capturing early factual recollections after incidents.

    Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 4 July 2024.
  3. Action

    Introduce Edinburgh Emergency Medicine STOP 5 hot debriefs to provide immediate team discussion, document learning, and highlight factual-recollection requirements after incidents.

    Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 4 July 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to capture early reflective accounts from key staff

Wider context from the report

“2. Failure to ensure early reflective accounts were captured from key staff in response to this significant event and others. I consider this to be a Trust wide issue. The Trust cannot begin to rectify patient safety issues, if they do not understand exactly what happened and why. This analysis can only properly occur with the input of those involved in care, and in circumstances where those individuals have had the opportunity and support of the Trust to capture early written accounts. The Trust currently has no clear system in place to facilitate this early capture of relevant accounts. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the Antepartum Haemorrhage guideline to convey urgency and account for occult blood loss

Wider context from the report

“1. The Trust’s Antepartum Haemorrhage guideline gives no sense of urgency when staff are faced with a bleed – here, staff failed to appreciate the potential for a sinister cause of bleeding both at 21.18 and later at 03.40, and did not appear to appreciate the fact that a volume of the bleeding may well be occult, by the external volume representing only a small proportion of the actual blood loss. Miss Al-Samarrai accepted that further work was likely to be required in this regard. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe management of antepartum haemorrhage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate the ratified Antepartum Haemorrhage guideline changes to maternity staff through email and shift handovers, with read-and-understood acknowledgements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following ratification of the guideline, the updates have been shared with all staff members. The guideline updates have been shared via email and in person on shift handovers, and all staff have been asked to sign a registration sheet as evidence that they have read and understood the amendments. Additional support and training will be provided on an individualised basis to staff that do not understand the changes, this will be supported by their line manager and the practice development midwives.”

Source location

Response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 4 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a Trust-wide system, templates, guidance, staff engagement, governance, and review prompts for capturing early factual recollections after incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust have put in place a system of capturing early Factual Recollection of Events, which are a description of involvement in an incident at the time it occurred but are not a replacement for the medical record.”

Source location

Response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 4 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce Edinburgh Emergency Medicine STOP 5 hot debriefs to provide immediate team discussion, document learning, and highlight factual-recollection requirements after incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust’s Maternity department, supported by the Professional Midwifery Advocates, are reviewing the immediate responses taken following an incident as defined within the Trusts Incident Reporting Policy and are planning to introduce the Edinburgh Emergency Medicine ‘STOP 5’ moments for ‘Hot Debriefs’. This will enable clinicians involved in an incident to have a 5-minute team debrief immediately following an incident. During this team debrief, the need to complete a Factual Recollection of Events will be highlighted to relevant staff and will provide the clinicians with a space to discuss what went well and the opportunities to improve. The debrief will be documented and saved on the Incident reporting system.”

Source location

Response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 4 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update and ratify the Antepartum Haemorrhage guideline to require urgent assessment, worst-case assumptions, bleeding quantification, telephone triage, and preparation for potential ambulance transfer.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has reviewed and updated its Antepartum Haemorrhage guideline to emphasise the clinical importance of bleeding in pregnancy, and the requirement for an immediate assessment of fetal and maternal condition with any degree of bleeding. The guideline now informs staff that best practice is to treat bleeding with an expectation of a worse-case scenario and then de-escalate if appropriate, rather than treating it as benign. The causes of Antepartum Haemorrhage section within the guideline has been amended to highlight that bleeding in pregnancy is not normal and can be unpredictable, and the expectation around quantifying and documenting repeated episodes of bleeding within the patient record has been added to support the ongoing risk assessments.”

Source location

Response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 4 July 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Continue multidisciplinary Triggers reviews of Antepartum Haemorrhage cases to monitor adherence to updated guidance and identify learning, escalation, and investigation needs.

    Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 4 July 2024.
  2. 2

    Develop an Antepartum Haemorrhage scenario video demonstrating telephone triage using the BSOTS proforma for staff access and training.

    Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 4 July 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue multidisciplinary Triggers reviews of Antepartum Haemorrhage cases to monitor adherence to updated guidance and identify learning, escalation, and investigation needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Antepartum Haemorrhage cases will continue to be reviewed through our ‘triggers’ incident review meeting, to ensure that the recommendations within the updated guideline are being followed. ‘Triggers’ is a weekly multidisciplinary case review meeting where there are set criteria for cases to be reviewed and membership includes Obstetricians, Matron for Maternity Governance, specialist midwives including the Fetal Monitoring Lead, Audit Lead and Clinical Governance Midwives, incidents are then escalated in line with the Incident Reporting Policy. The Triggers meeting is an open forum for staff members to attend for their own learning, and aims to identify learning from incidents, along with identification of cases further escalation and investigation. Cases will also be escalated into regional and national conversations as appropriate.”

Source location

Response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 4 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop an Antepartum Haemorrhage scenario video demonstrating telephone triage using the BSOTS proforma for staff access and training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Maternity team are currently developing an Antepartum Haemorrhage scenario video that includes role play of a phone call in progress whilst a midwife completes the Birmingham Symptom Specific Obstetric Triage System (BSOTS) telephone proforma. This consists of a prompt and brief assessment (triage) of women when they present with unexpected problems or concerns, and then a standardised way of determining the clinical urgency in which they need to be seen. This will be available for staff members to access anytime and has been included within our BSOTS Training Needs Analysis (TNA).”

Source location

Response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 4 July 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026