PFD report

Jack Goodwin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 Feb 2021•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure of the call-handling script to support discussion of self-transport or provide a realistic ambulance-arrival timescale
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of ambulance dispatch status and expectationsPart of recurring concern: Unsafe emergency call handling
  2. Lack of provision in the call-handling script to specify an acute hospital with an A and E department
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe emergency call handling
  3. Failure of the call-handling script to emphasise further contact after deterioration for reassessment of urgency
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe emergency call handling
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Explore adding advice to ambulance call scripts to direct callers to the nearest hospital with an emergency department when appropriate.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 February 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Providing an accurate ambulance arrival time is impracticable because lower-priority responses may be diverted to higher-priority incidents.

    Stated by NHS EnglandUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the call-handling script to support discussion of self-transport or provide a realistic ambulance-arrival timescale

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard that at the time of the calls to NWAS on 15th December 2017 they were very busy. The script used by the call handler allowed them to indicate that they were busy. However it did not allow for any suggestion or discussion about whether he would be better to make his own way there or allow for the provision by the call handler of a realistic timescale for the ambulance arriving. As a consequence it was difficult for the call maker to make an assessment of the best course of action to ensure that Mr Goodwin received medical attention at the earliest opportunity. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication of ambulance dispatch status and expectations; Unsafe emergency call handling.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of provision in the call-handling script to specify an acute hospital with an A and E department

Wider context from the report

“2. When a decision was made to take Mr Goodwin direct to the hospital and NWAS were told. There was no provision within the script to emphasise that the hospital would need to be an acute hospital with an A and E department. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe emergency call handling.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the call-handling script to emphasise further contact after deterioration for reassessment of urgency

Wider context from the report

“3. There was an indication that given that if Mr Goodwin deteriorated then a further call should be made to NWAS. The evidence before the inquest was that this was not emphasised in such a way within the script to ensure there could be a further assessment of urgency. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe emergency call handling.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore adding advice to ambulance call scripts to direct callers to the nearest hospital with an emergency department when appropriate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“999 calls to the ambulance service can be answered anywhere in the country so we cannot rely on local knowledge; call handlers do not have immediate access to which is the nearest emergency department in those situations where a caller advises that the patient would make their own way to hospital. In appropriate circumstances, NHS E/I consider that advising the caller that they should make their way to the nearest emergency department, noting that not all hospitals have emergency departments, would be a useful addition to the script callers receive. This will be explored through the Ambulance Transformation Forum.”

Source location

2021-0036-Response-from-NHS-England_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 15 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Providing an accurate ambulance arrival time is impracticable because lower-priority responses may be diverted to higher-priority incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All ambulance services are responsible for having in place scripts and procedures for dealing with delays in responding when under operational pressure. It is not possible in practice to offer an accurate arrival time for any given patient, but ambulance services will know an approximate current waiting time for that category of patient. NHS E/I support a position that callers should be provided with sufficient information to make informed decisions if an ambulance has not been despatched to the patient.”

Source location

2021-0036-Response-from-NHS-England_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 15 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Case exit scripts already routinely instruct callers to call 999 again if the patient's condition changes or deteriorates.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Instructions on worsening conditions, including specifically to call back on 999 should the patient’s condition change or deteriorate, are standard components of the case exit script. If this was not provided in a clear and easy to interpret manner this is a matter for ambulance services to resolve locally as a training issue for call handlers.”

Source location

2021-0036-Response-from-NHS-England_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 15 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ambulance services must resolve unclear deterioration instructions locally through call-handler training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Instructions on worsening conditions, including specifically to call back on 999 should the patient’s condition change or deteriorate, are standard components of the case exit script. If this was not provided in a clear and easy to interpret manner this is a matter for ambulance services to resolve locally as a training issue for call handlers.”

Source location

2021-0036-Response-from-NHS-England_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 15 February 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026