PFD report

William PIERCY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 May 2014•Kingston upon Hull & the East Riding of Yorkshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of a seat belt alarm to alert carers to seat belt disengagement
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate vehicle occupant restraint systems
  2. Unrestrained passengers following seat belt disengagement
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate vehicle occupant restraint systems
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a seat belt alarm to alert carers to seat belt disengagement

Wider context from the report

“(1) Seat belt was disengaged thereby allowing a passenger to be unrestrained and when vehicle came to an abrupt halt, he was thrown forward and fractured his neck. A seat belt alarm would have alerted his carers to the disengagement of the seat belt. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate vehicle occupant restraint systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unrestrained passengers following seat belt disengagement

Wider context from the report

“(1) Seat belt was disengaged thereby allowing a passenger to be unrestrained and when vehicle came to an abrupt halt, he was thrown forward and fractured his neck. A seat belt alarm would have alerted his carers to the disengagement of the seat belt. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate vehicle occupant restraint systems.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026