PFD report

Nicola Valerie MARSDEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Aug 2014•Bedfordshire and Luton

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to ensure neurological and brain scans are viewed and reported by Neuro-Radiologists
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable interpretation of diagnostic imaging
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure neurological and brain scans are viewed and reported by Neuro-Radiologists

Wider context from the report

“• That during the course of the evidence I was told that the brain scan relating to the deceased was mis-interpreted. The CT scans were viewed by a Radiologist and not a Neuro-Radiologist, despite the fact that there is a Guideline for having the scans viewed by a Neuro-Radiologist at Addenbrooke’s Hospital. • My concern is that the interpretation of neurological scans and brain scans should be viewed and reported by Neuro-Radiologists and perhaps the Protocol for viewing of scans by non-specialists should be reviewed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable interpretation of diagnostic imaging.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.