PFD report

Douglas Grey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Oct 2013•East London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of a written procedure or policy for notifying district nurses of delivery of assessed equipment
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable coordination of safety equipment installation requests
  2. Failure of carers to recognise and report faults in equipment delivered for residents
  3. Lack of a written procedure or policy for correct installation of assessed equipment
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable coordination of safety equipment installation requests
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a written procedure or policy for notifying district nurses of delivery of assessed equipment

Wider context from the report

“1. Evidence was given at the inquest that there was no clear written procedure or policy in place to ensure notification to the district nurses of delivery of equipment they had assessed as being needed, correct installation of that equipment and review of the equipment’s performance. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable coordination of safety equipment installation requests.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of carers to recognise and report faults in equipment delivered for residents

Wider context from the report

“2. Evidence was given at the inquest that despite a clear written policy on recognising and reporting faults in equipment delivered for residents, carers did not appear to recognise the faulty nature of the inflatable mattress and act in accordance with the written policy of the home. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a written procedure or policy for correct installation of assessed equipment

Wider context from the report

“1. Evidence was given at the inquest that there was no clear written procedure or policy in place to ensure notification to the district nurses of delivery of equipment they had assessed as being needed, correct installation of that equipment and review of the equipment’s performance. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable coordination of safety equipment installation requests.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a written procedure or policy for reviewing equipment performance

Wider context from the report

“1. Evidence was given at the inquest that there was no clear written procedure or policy in place to ensure notification to the district nurses of delivery of equipment they had assessed as being needed, correct installation of that equipment and review of the equipment’s performance. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable coordination of safety equipment installation requests.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.