PFD report

Darren Robert URQUHART · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Sep 2018•Hertfordshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised3

  1. Inadequate positioning of the trespass deterrence mat
  2. Inadequacy of fencing
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate physical barriers preventing access to dangerous drops or areas
  3. Lack of gates at the south end of platforms 1 and 2
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate positioning of the trespass deterrence mat

Wider context from the report

“(1) The position of the trespass mat referred to in the report of T.Ramskill at recommendation 2 of his site report. (2) The lack of gates at the south end of platforms 1 and 2. (3) The inadequacy of the fencing shown in Image 6 of T.Ramskill’s report and the position of the trespass deterrence mat low down on the ramp. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequacy of fencing

Wider context from the report

“(1) The position of the trespass mat referred to in the report of T.Ramskill at recommendation 2 of his site report. (2) The lack of gates at the south end of platforms 1 and 2. (3) The inadequacy of the fencing shown in Image 6 of T.Ramskill’s report and the position of the trespass deterrence mat low down on the ramp. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate physical barriers preventing access to dangerous drops or areas.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of gates at the south end of platforms 1 and 2

Wider context from the report

“(1) The position of the trespass mat referred to in the report of T.Ramskill at recommendation 2 of his site report. (2) The lack of gates at the south end of platforms 1 and 2. (3) The inadequacy of the fencing shown in Image 6 of T.Ramskill’s report and the position of the trespass deterrence mat low down on the ramp. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026