Antony Waring · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 May 2024•Lancashire and Blackburn with Darwen

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of ultrasound teaching for consultants unable to use ultrasound
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinician competence for ultrasound examinations
  2. Use of inappropriate research providing false reassurance about suprapubic catheter risks in patients with lower abdominal surgery
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical treatment approaches are supported by adequate evidence
  3. Failure to ensure ancillary prophylactic measures for high-risk patients allocated to Core Lists

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust

    Schedule complex suprapubic catheter insertions as joint theatre procedures with a responsible Consultant Urologist and an expert Consultant Radiologist with ultrasound equipment available.

  2. East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust

    Review theatre lists weekly, confirm patient suitability before surgery, and use embedded pre-list checks and post-list debriefs to identify equipment needs and learning.

  3. East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust

    Establish monitoring and escalation arrangements to assure compliance with the complex suprapubic catheter SOP.

  4. East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust

    Approve, ratify and embed a safety SOP for complex suprapubic catheter insertions after previous abdominal or bladder surgery.

  5. East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust

    Introduce regular audits and associated assurance reporting for compliance with the complex suprapubic catheter SOP.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust

    It is not practically feasible to train Urology Consultants to the expertise required for rare, complex cases; Consultant Radiologists therefore provide ultrasound.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of ultrasound teaching for consultants unable to use ultrasound

Wider context from the report

“(3) in the four years since Antony Waring's death, the Trust has not provided a single ultrasound teaching session provided by the Trust to any consultant who is not capable of using ultrasound. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinician competence for ultrasound examinations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use of inappropriate research providing false reassurance about suprapubic catheter risks in patients with lower abdominal surgery

Wider context from the report

“(5) The expert evidence at the inquest was that the research provided on the risk of complications after insertion of a suprapubic catheter into patients with lower abdominal surgery is inappropriate the patient such as Antony Waring and provides false reassurance as to the level of risk posed to these patients. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical treatment approaches are supported by adequate evidence.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure ancillary prophylactic measures for high-risk patients allocated to Core Lists

Wider context from the report

“(4) the allocation of high-risk patients to Core Lists where a specific ancillary prophylactic measure such as ultrasound is left to either chance or to an administrator; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to introduce a recommended standard operating procedure

Wider context from the report

“(1) the Trust made no progress on the introduction of an SOP recommended in the internal review for almost 4 years. A draft SOP had been proposed in the week leading up to the inquest. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use of suboptimal pre-insertion CT scanning instead of ultrasound for suprapubic catheter insertion

Wider context from the report

“(2) The expert evidence at the inquest was that the Trust's proposed action plan using CT scanning at an unspecified time before a suprapubic catheter insertion was sub optimal and inferior to ultrasound as bowel may move between the date of the CT scan and the catheter insertion; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Schedule complex suprapubic catheter insertions as joint theatre procedures with a responsible Consultant Urologist and an expert Consultant Radiologist with ultrasound equipment available.

Verbatim wording from the response

“With regards to the concern regarding ultrasound scanning I can confirm that under the new SOP complex SPC insertions are now listed as a scheduled joint procedure with a Consultant Urological Surgeon and Consultant Radiologist in the theatre suite at Royal Blackburn Hospital. This will ensure the availability and presence of a Consultant Radiologist (with expertise in ultrasound scanning) and the ultrasound scanner itself.”

Source location

Response ELHT
Page 2 · response
Published 1 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review theatre lists weekly, confirm patient suitability before surgery, and use embedded pre-list checks and post-list debriefs to identify equipment needs and learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that weekly meetings are scheduled to review each individual theatre list and these are attended and led by the Trust’s Clinical Director for Urology. At each weekly meeting the individual theatre list for the next two weeks is reviewed, looking at each individual patient case and ensuring that these are suitable.”

Source location

Response ELHT
Page 3 · response
Published 1 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish monitoring and escalation arrangements to assure compliance with the complex suprapubic catheter SOP.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As an organisation we constantly strive to improve patient safety and I can confirm these changes have been confirmed by both the Urology and Radiology Departments. In order to ensure the SOP is fully embedded, an assurance process is now in place for monitoring and escalation, with regular audits being introduced and associated assurance reporting.”

Source location

Response ELHT
Page 2 · response
Published 1 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Approve, ratify and embed a safety SOP for complex suprapubic catheter insertions after previous abdominal or bladder surgery.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am pleased to confirm that the Trust’s SOP for ‘Minimising the risks of supra-pubic catheter insertion in complex cases of patients who have had previous abdominal or bladder surgery’ has now been approved and ratified following the inquest hearing.”

Source location

Response ELHT
Page 1 · response
Published 1 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce regular audits and associated assurance reporting for compliance with the complex suprapubic catheter SOP.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As an organisation we constantly strive to improve patient safety and I can confirm these changes have been confirmed by both the Urology and Radiology Departments. In order to ensure the SOP is fully embedded, an assurance process is now in place for monitoring and escalation, with regular audits being introduced and associated assurance reporting.”

Source location

Response ELHT
Page 2 · response
Published 1 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

It is not practically feasible to train Urology Consultants to the expertise required for rare, complex cases; Consultant Radiologists therefore provide ultrasound.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that Suprapubic Catheter placement is only performed by clinicians who are trained and confident to perform that procedure.”

Source location

Response ELHT
Page 3 · response
Published 1 August 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026