PFD report

Carl Anthony Butler and Sean Brett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Jan 2025•North Wales (East and Central)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Delays in delivering required control-room training and actions
  2. Unclear control-room methodology for adding vehicles to the ANPR/Vehicle Finder System
  3. Failure to require and confirm officer acknowledgement and action on reports
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Issue new guidance requiring communications operators and operational officers to confirm patrol responses, record deployment details, escalate unavailable patrols, and end ‘nothing heard’ responses.

    Stated by Cheshire ConstabularyStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 January 2025.
  2. Action

    Require communications operators to repeat refresher training through ongoing professional development.

    Stated by Cheshire ConstabularyStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 January 2025.
  3. Action

    Provide additional support from the ANPR coordinator to communications operators.

    Stated by Cheshire ConstabularyStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 January 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The operator had received initial training in March 2021; the December 2024 training was refresher training, not initial training.

    Stated by Cheshire ConstabularyDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in delivering required control-room training and actions

Wider context from the report

“2. There was also confusion within the control room as to the methodology by which a vehicle could be added to an ANPR/Vehicle Finder System, and although an IOPC investigation was finalised in February 2023 which identified potential learning for the force in respect of ensuring control room staff understand the appropriate processes, evidence was heard at the inquest that a witness had not received this training until December 2024 due to a lack of time being made available to her to undertake the same. (Where learning identifies required training/actions, any delays in delivering this, can only serve to perpetuate the risks which such training/actions is aimed at mitigating.) ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unclear control-room methodology for adding vehicles to the ANPR/Vehicle Finder System

Wider context from the report

“2. There was also confusion within the control room as to the methodology by which a vehicle could be added to an ANPR/Vehicle Finder System, and although an IOPC investigation was finalised in February 2023 which identified potential learning for the force in respect of ensuring control room staff understand the appropriate processes, evidence was heard at the inquest that a witness had not received this training until December 2024 due to a lack of time being made available to her to undertake the same. (Where learning identifies required training/actions, any delays in delivering this, can only serve to perpetuate the risks which such training/actions is aimed at mitigating.) ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to require and confirm officer acknowledgement and action on reports

Wider context from the report

“1. There was a confused picture of the management of the reports and information being handled by Cheshire Police insofar as a request for observations would be put out to officers by a communications operator, however there was no requirement for any officer to acknowledge that they had received such a request and therefore no means by which it could be confirmed that any actions were being undertaken as a result of the reports which had been received. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue new guidance requiring communications operators and operational officers to confirm patrol responses, record deployment details, escalate unavailable patrols, and end ‘nothing heard’ responses.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cheshire Constabulary has reviewed the way in which reports of dangerous driving / drivers are processed. As part of that change, all communications operators who work within the resource deployment centre (RDC) and all operational officers will receive new guidance as a direct result of the learning from investigation into the deaths of Mr Butler and Mr Brett on 26th February 2022:”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 1 · response
Published 21 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require communications operators to repeat refresher training through ongoing professional development.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All communications operators who currently work within the resource deployment centre have attended a specific course which includes ANPR, Hotlist (Cleartone) and Vehicle Finder. There is also ongoing continued professional development plan in which all operators (including call taking function) will be required to repeat refresher training. Additional support will be provided by the ANPR coordinator.”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 2 · response
Published 21 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide additional support from the ANPR coordinator to communications operators.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All communications operators who currently work within the resource deployment centre have attended a specific course which includes ANPR, Hotlist (Cleartone) and Vehicle Finder. There is also ongoing continued professional development plan in which all operators (including call taking function) will be required to repeat refresher training. Additional support will be provided by the ANPR coordinator.”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 2 · response
Published 21 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure all resource deployment centre communications operators complete training covering ANPR, Hotlist and Vehicle Finder processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In court, communications operator Natalia Komorowska stated that she had not received her training until December 2024. Natalia has clarified that she was referring to refresher training and Constabulary training records show that she had received her initial training in March 2021, and she was confirmed as being a competent deployment operator in October 2021. In December 2024 Natalia received a refresher of the foundation and dispatcher NCALTS training.”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 2 · response
Published 21 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The operator had received initial training in March 2021; the December 2024 training was refresher training, not initial training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In court, communications operator Natalia Komorowska stated that she had not received her training until December 2024. Natalia has clarified that she was referring to refresher training and Constabulary training records show that she had received her initial training in March 2021, and she was confirmed as being a competent deployment operator in October 2021. In December 2024 Natalia received a refresher of the foundation and dispatcher NCALTS training.”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 2 · response
Published 21 January 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026