Alex Dews · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Oct 2023•South Yorkshire (Western)

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Excessive waiting times for NHS mental health services
    Part of recurring concern: Excessive waiting times for NHS mental health services
  2. Failure to refer students to NHS mental health services when they are receiving other support
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable mental health referral pathways
  3. Unclear allocation of school-procured psychology support

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Department for Education

    Develop guidance for schools and colleges supporting children questioning their gender.

  2. Department for Education

    Hold a full public consultation on the draft guidance before publication.

  3. Outwood Grange Academies Trust

    Establish an I-Space discharge process providing the academy with reports on continuing support and potential re-referral.

  4. Outwood Grange Academies Trust

    Host a wellbeing drop-in session for students needing follow-up support or waiting to access I-Space.

  5. Outwood Grange Academies Trust

    Procure and fund I-Space counselling services to fill gaps in available mental-health support.

  6. Outwood Grange Academies Trust

    Train Inclusion and pastoral staff to deliver individual and group mental-health and wellbeing interventions.

  7. Department of Health and Social Care

    Continue expanding and transforming NHS mental health care for children and young people.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Department for Education

    Decisions about appropriate school support services are delegated to school leaders rather than prescribed by the Department.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. Department for Education

    The circumstances did not meet the threshold for a child serious incident or action by the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Excessive waiting times for NHS mental health services

Wider context from the report

“1. Alex was not referred by school to NHS mental health services as a result of their experience that if Alex was in receipt of any other support he would not be accepted onto the waiting list (which would be in excess of 10 months to be seen). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Excessive waiting times for NHS mental health services.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to refer students to NHS mental health services when they are receiving other support

Wider context from the report

“1. Alex was not referred by school to NHS mental health services as a result of their experience that if Alex was in receipt of any other support he would not be accepted onto the waiting list (which would be in excess of 10 months to be seen). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unclear allocation of school-procured psychology support

Wider context from the report

“2. The school chose to provide Alex with school procured psychology support however the process of allocation of provision was not clear. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a clear process for receiving outputs from support services

Wider context from the report

“3. The school did not have a clear communication process with the provider of support to either refer the student into services or to receive outputs from those services once the student completed their sessions ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a clear process for referring students to support services

Wider context from the report

“3. The school did not have a clear communication process with the provider of support to either refer the student into services or to receive outputs from those services once the student completed their sessions ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop guidance for schools and colleges supporting children questioning their gender.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department is working with the Minister for Women and Equalities to develop guidance to support schools and colleges in relation to children who are questioning their gender. We know that this is a complex and sensitive issue, and that some schools and colleges feel that they need more support in this area in order to help pupils, students, and parents to deal with concerns raised. The Department will hold a full public consultation on the draft guidance prior to its publication.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold a full public consultation on the draft guidance before publication.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department is working with the Minister for Women and Equalities to develop guidance to support schools and colleges in relation to children who are questioning their gender. We know that this is a complex and sensitive issue, and that some schools and colleges feel that they need more support in this area in order to help pupils, students, and parents to deal with concerns raised. The Department will hold a full public consultation on the draft guidance prior to its publication.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish an I-Space discharge process providing the academy with reports on continuing support and potential re-referral.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The academy has worked with I-space to review processes around how a young person is discharged when their allocated sessions come to an end. This review had already taken place prior to the inquest and has now been in place for over a year. A copy of the discharge form (Appendix D) shows that the service now provides a discharge report to the inclusion team in school. This details how the school could support further and would be used to detail how any further re-referral to the service would best be considered. In any event, a pupil who has received support from the I-Space service would remain on the academy’s vulnerable register and, therefore, be triaged weekly as to whether any re-referral or referral to an escalated service might be deemed necessary.”

Source location

Response from Outwood Grange Academies Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Host a wellbeing drop-in session for students needing follow-up support or waiting to access I-Space.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the services available in school from ISpace at the time of Alex’s death they now also host a wellbeing drop-in session for students who no longer access iSpace but may need a catch-up. This session is also open for students and families who may be waiting to see iSpace to become familiar with colleagues and to learn a little more about the support available.”

Source location

Response from Outwood Grange Academies Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Procure and fund I-Space counselling services to fill gaps in available mental-health support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• I-Space: Additional counselling service procured and paid for by the academy to fill any gap in service. They specifically support young people with Anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts, self-esteem, stress, anger, bullying, self-harm, bereavement, family breakdown, abuse, neglect.”

Source location

Response from Outwood Grange Academies Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train Inclusion and pastoral staff to deliver individual and group mental-health and wellbeing interventions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of the expected graduated response to support young people who may be struggling with their mental health and wellbeing, Outwood Academy Shafton offers a wide range of internal and external interventions and has built strong, positive relationships with external agencies to ensure that students can receive the best possible interventions which can support their wellbeing and learning. Alongside this, we have ensured training of our own Inclusion and pastoral staff to enable them to deliver one to one or group work sessions which help us to create a bespoke intervention package to help, guide and support our students and families.”

Source location

Response from Outwood Grange Academies Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue expanding and transforming NHS mental health care for children and young people.

Verbatim wording from the response

“More generally, we are aware that some children and young people are not able to access support they need in a timely manner. Through the NHS Long Term Plan, we are continuing to expand and transform NHS mental health care and spend on children and young people’s mental health services has increased from £841 million in 2019/20 to just over £1 billion in 2022/23.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Decisions about appropriate school support services are delegated to school leaders rather than prescribed by the Department.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department for Education is not prescriptive in what support services schools can use – that authority is delegated to school leaders to ensure that the support is tailored for children by those who know them best. Schools have delegated budgets to make those decisions and should escalate cases to children’s social care or to child and adolescent mental health services when there is cause for concern over and above the support that a school puts in place.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The circumstances did not meet the threshold for a child serious incident or action by the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst the sad circumstances of Alex’s case would not have met the threshold for a child serious incident, or action by the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel, there is local learning for the Barnsley Safeguarding Children Partnership, and they may well appreciate sight of the Regulation 28 in Alex’s name, if you have not already shared them.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026