Charles Williamson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Sep 2019•Manchester South

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
12

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Insufficient availability of appropriate neuro-rehabilitation beds in Greater Manchester

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.12

  1. NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

    Develop a Greater Manchester neuro-rehabilitation training and education programme with supporting resources.

  2. NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

    Provide community-service in-reach into inpatient neuro-rehabilitation services to support discharge into the community.

  3. NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

    Plan transfer of existing NHS inpatient neuro-rehabilitation services to the selected single provider.

  4. NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

    Improve consistency of neuro-rehabilitation processes and documentation.

  5. NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

    Conduct peer review of inpatient neuro-rehabilitation services.

  6. NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

    Work through estate options for 10 post-acute tracheostomy or prolonged-disorder-of-consciousness beds.

  7. NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

    Develop a Greater Manchester neuro-rehabilitation patient and carer network for involvement in service improvement and development.

  8. NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

    Develop community and inpatient neuro-rehabilitation service standards.

  9. NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

    Improve discharge planning and establish a complex discharge service to reduce delays and support patient flow.

  10. NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

    Establish 20 NHS slow-stream neuro-rehabilitation beds.

  11. NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

    Increase and standardise the inpatient neuro-rehabilitation bed-day tariff.

  12. NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

    Commission community neuro-rehabilitation services to the agreed specification across every Greater Manchester locality.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Department of Health and Social Care

    Access to neuro-rehabilitation services was not considered a factor in the deceased’s death.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  2. Department of Health and Social Care

    Local NHS commissioners are responsible for providing neuro-rehabilitation services in Greater Manchester.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient availability of appropriate neuro-rehabilitation beds in Greater Manchester

Wider context from the report

“The inquest heard that following neurological incidents such as those sustained by Mr Williamson it will often be the case that a key to returning to baseline or closer to baseline is effective and early neuro-rehabilitation. The inquest was told that a shortage of appropriate neuro-rehabilitation beds in Greater Manchester was in some cases preventing early effective neuro-rehabilitation and increasing the risk of complications which could lead to death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a Greater Manchester neuro-rehabilitation training and education programme with supporting resources.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Throughout the process of developing a case for change, a new model of care and business case for a new neuro-rehabilitation service, community and inpatient services have undertaken significant work to improve their services. For example:”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide community-service in-reach into inpatient neuro-rehabilitation services to support discharge into the community.

Verbatim wording from the response

“- Improved discharge planning practices to improve patient’s experience of the discharge process, reduce length of stay and improve patient flow - Establishment of a complex discharge service to improve patient’s experience of the discharge process, reduce length of stay and improve patient flow - Community service in-reach into inpatient neuro-rehabilitation services to support people being discharged into the community - Development of community and inpatient service standards - Peer review of inpatient services - Development of a GM-wide training & education programme and resources - Development of a GM neuro-rehabilitation patient & carer network to ensure patient & carer involvement in service improvement and development work - Improved consistency of processes and documentation”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Plan transfer of existing NHS inpatient neuro-rehabilitation services to the selected single provider.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Inpatient Neuro-rehabilitation Services: Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (SRFT) has been selected as the single provider for the inpatient (bed-based) part of the neuro-rehabilitation service model. - SRFT commenced work in July 2019 to plan for the transfer of the current NHS inpatient services into the management of Salford Royal. Transfer of the services is expected to take place during January-March 2020 - 20 slow-stream neuro-rehabilitation beds will be established during May-December 2020 - Estate options for the 10 post-acute tracheostomy/prolonged disorder of consciousness beds are currently being worked through and as such a definitive timescale for establishing these 10 beds has not yet been agreed”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve consistency of neuro-rehabilitation processes and documentation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“- Improved discharge planning practices to improve patient’s experience of the discharge process, reduce length of stay and improve patient flow - Establishment of a complex discharge service to improve patient’s experience of the discharge process, reduce length of stay and improve patient flow - Community service in-reach into inpatient neuro-rehabilitation services to support people being discharged into the community - Development of community and inpatient service standards - Peer review of inpatient services - Development of a GM-wide training & education programme and resources - Development of a GM neuro-rehabilitation patient & carer network to ensure patient & carer involvement in service improvement and development work - Improved consistency of processes and documentation”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct peer review of inpatient neuro-rehabilitation services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“- Improved discharge planning practices to improve patient’s experience of the discharge process, reduce length of stay and improve patient flow - Establishment of a complex discharge service to improve patient’s experience of the discharge process, reduce length of stay and improve patient flow - Community service in-reach into inpatient neuro-rehabilitation services to support people being discharged into the community - Development of community and inpatient service standards - Peer review of inpatient services - Development of a GM-wide training & education programme and resources - Development of a GM neuro-rehabilitation patient & carer network to ensure patient & carer involvement in service improvement and development work - Improved consistency of processes and documentation”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work through estate options for 10 post-acute tracheostomy or prolonged-disorder-of-consciousness beds.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• In addition, up to 10 beds for the management of patients with tracheostomy and/or prolonged disorder of consciousness (as an alternative to ad hoc commissioned beds in the independent sector),”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a Greater Manchester neuro-rehabilitation patient and carer network for involvement in service improvement and development.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Throughout the process of developing a case for change, a new model of care and business case for a new neuro-rehabilitation service, community and inpatient services have undertaken significant work to improve their services. For example:”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop community and inpatient neuro-rehabilitation service standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Throughout the process of developing a case for change, a new model of care and business case for a new neuro-rehabilitation service, community and inpatient services have undertaken significant work to improve their services. For example:”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve discharge planning and establish a complex discharge service to reduce delays and support patient flow.

Verbatim wording from the response

“- Improved discharge planning practices to improve patient’s experience of the discharge process, reduce length of stay and improve patient flow - Establishment of a complex discharge service to improve patient’s experience of the discharge process, reduce length of stay and improve patient flow - Community service in-reach into inpatient neuro-rehabilitation services to support people being discharged into the community - Development of community and inpatient service standards - Peer review of inpatient services - Development of a GM-wide training & education programme and resources - Development of a GM neuro-rehabilitation patient & carer network to ensure patient & carer involvement in service improvement and development work - Improved consistency of processes and documentation”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish 20 NHS slow-stream neuro-rehabilitation beds.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• 20 new NHS beds for patients requiring slow stream neuro-rehabilitation (as an alternative to ad hoc commissioned beds in the independent sector),”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase and standardise the inpatient neuro-rehabilitation bed-day tariff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Greater Manchester Joint Commissioning Board agreed the business case for the new model of care in June 2019. The business case also included an agreement for the bed day tariff to be increased and standardised across the inpatient services.”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission community neuro-rehabilitation services to the agreed specification across every Greater Manchester locality.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Community neuro-rehabilitation services in every locality area providing patients with a consistent service offer, regardless of postcode, and”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Access to neuro-rehabilitation services was not considered a factor in the deceased’s death.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From the information in your report, it appears that access to neuro-rehabilitation services was not a factor in Mr Williamson's death. However, I agree with you that access to early and effective neuro-rehabilitation services is key to recovery for patients that have sustained a head injury.”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-the-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local NHS commissioners are responsible for providing neuro-rehabilitation services in Greater Manchester.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The provision of neuro-rehabilitation services in Greater Manchester is a matter for local NHS commissioners. The Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership (GMHSCP) was formed in 2016, bringing together local authorities, NHS commissioners, NHS providers and the Mayoral Combined Authority to oversee the health and social care devolution programme in Greater Manchester. The GMHSCP has control of a £6 billion health and social care budget that is used to provide integrated care.”

Source location

2019-0326-Response-from-the-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 8 November 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026