PFD report

Jacqueline Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Nov 2015•Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of emergency department visibility of referral acceptance and assessment timing
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of the Emergency Department mental health liaison assessment pathway to provide timely and safe assessmentPart of recurring concern: Unreliable mental health referral pathways
  2. Failure of the referral process to identify and rectify errors
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of case monitoring to identify cases requiring follow-upPart of recurring concern: Unreliable mental health referral pathways
  3. Failure of the Mental Health Liaison Team to identify patients believed to be referred and awaiting assessment
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of the Emergency Department mental health liaison assessment pathway to provide timely and safe assessment
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Explore developing an email referral system providing receipt confirmation and an approximate assessment time.

    Stated by Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 November 2015.
  2. Action

    Plan to utilise the CRISP board to record referrals to specialist teams.

    Stated by Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 2 November 2015.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of emergency department visibility of referral acceptance and assessment timing

Wider context from the report

“That the process of referral to the Mental Health Liaison Team was subject to human error and that the systems in place failed to provide for such mistakes to be easily identified and rectified. In particular there was no opportunity for staff in the emergency department to see confirmation that a referral had been accepted, the time of that referral and the expected time when a mental health assessment would take place. Likewise the Mental Health Liaison Team did not have a process that whereby they were able to identify those patients that the staff in the emergency department believed had been referred and were awaiting assessment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of the Emergency Department mental health liaison assessment pathway to provide timely and safe assessment; Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the referral process to identify and rectify errors

Wider context from the report

“That the process of referral to the Mental Health Liaison Team was subject to human error and that the systems in place failed to provide for such mistakes to be easily identified and rectified. In particular there was no opportunity for staff in the emergency department to see confirmation that a referral had been accepted, the time of that referral and the expected time when a mental health assessment would take place. Likewise the Mental Health Liaison Team did not have a process that whereby they were able to identify those patients that the staff in the emergency department believed had been referred and were awaiting assessment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of case monitoring to identify cases requiring follow-up; Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the Mental Health Liaison Team to identify patients believed to be referred and awaiting assessment

Wider context from the report

“That the process of referral to the Mental Health Liaison Team was subject to human error and that the systems in place failed to provide for such mistakes to be easily identified and rectified. In particular there was no opportunity for staff in the emergency department to see confirmation that a referral had been accepted, the time of that referral and the expected time when a mental health assessment would take place. Likewise the Mental Health Liaison Team did not have a process that whereby they were able to identify those patients that the staff in the emergency department believed had been referred and were awaiting assessment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of the Emergency Department mental health liaison assessment pathway to provide timely and safe assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore developing an email referral system providing receipt confirmation and an approximate assessment time.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A further option we are exploring is the development of a system whereby East Lancashire Hospital NHS Trust staff email the Mental Health Liaison Team with the patient's details and a brief reason for referral. The Mental Health Liaison Team would then acknowledge receipt of the email and also give approximate time of assessment. The referral information is already recorded within the Mental Health Liaison referral log book, however this approach we are looking to implement will ensure that positive confirmation is provided to Emergency Department staff.”

Source location

2015-0421-Response-by-Lancashire-Care-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 2 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Plan to utilise the CRISP board to record referrals to specialist teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Within the Emergency Department they use the CRISP board to record the referrals made to specialist teams and we are looking to utilise this technology.”

Source location

2015-0421-Response-by-Lancashire-Care-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 2 November 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Meet with East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust to explore improvements to the referral process.

    Stated by Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 November 2015.
  2. 2

    Brief all staff on the referral process and share learning from the joint investigation.

    Stated by Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 November 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Meet with East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust to explore improvements to the referral process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also met with East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust to explore in detail how we can improve the referral process.”

Source location

2015-0421-Response-by-Lancashire-Care-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 2 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Brief all staff on the referral process and share learning from the joint investigation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the immediate term, we have briefed all staff on the referral process to ensure they fully understand that process and shared the learning from our joint investigation.”

Source location

2015-0421-Response-by-Lancashire-Care-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 2 November 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026