Kenneth PERKINS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Oct 2022•Derby and Derbyshire

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of clear, detailed transfer documentation covering medication, medical history and recurrent falls
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes
  2. Failure to request a transfer document
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust

    Use standardized SBAR transfer documentation to communicate patients’ clinical history, needs and risks between care providers.

  2. Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust

    Participate in the operational Derbyshire Shared Care Record to enable secure cross-organisation access to relevant patient information.

  3. Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust

    Use the STOP Safe Transfer of the Patient Tool for acute-to-acute ambulance transfers, supported by cascade training in relevant areas.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust

    UHDB considers established transfer, admission-assessment and information-sharing processes sufficient to support safe information exchange between care providers.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  2. Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust

    DCHS considers its established Admission, Discharge and Transfer Policy and SBAR process sufficient for safe patient transfers.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear, detailed transfer documentation covering medication, medical history and recurrent falls

Wider context from the report

“Mr Perkins was transferred from Ilkeston Community Hospital to the Royal Derby Hospital. There was no clear detailed handover or transfer document which would have detailed his medication, medical history and history of recurrent falls The Royal Derby Hospital did not (but should have) requested a transfer document. That history would have allowed an enhanced level of care and observation to be put in place so as to prevent further falls. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to request a transfer document

Wider context from the report

“Mr Perkins was transferred from Ilkeston Community Hospital to the Royal Derby Hospital. There was no clear detailed handover or transfer document which would have detailed his medication, medical history and history of recurrent falls The Royal Derby Hospital did not (but should have) requested a transfer document. That history would have allowed an enhanced level of care and observation to be put in place so as to prevent further falls. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use standardized SBAR transfer documentation to communicate patients’ clinical history, needs and risks between care providers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In line with the evidence already submitted to the Court, DCHS staff are required to follow the procedures set out in the Trusts Admission, Discharge and Transfer Policy for DCHS Community Hospitals Policy. The Policy is in place to support well organised, safe and timely admissions, discharges and transfers for all patients. The Policy (attached) also covers emergency transfers such as was the case for Mr Perkins.”

Source location

Response from University Hospital of Derby and Burton
Page 2 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Participate in the operational Derbyshire Shared Care Record to enable secure cross-organisation access to relevant patient information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to better improve the sharing of information about Patients in Derbyshire the Integrated Care System (Joined Up Care Derbyshire) developed the Derbyshire Shared Care Record. This became operational in December 2021.”

Source location

Response from University Hospital of Derby and Burton
Page 3 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use the STOP Safe Transfer of the Patient Tool for acute-to-acute ambulance transfers, supported by cascade training in relevant areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A further form the STOP Safe Transfer of the Patient Tool (appendix 2) has been developed for acute to acute ambulance hospital transfers and was introduced in November 2021. This form is mainly used for transfers between Emergency Departments and high dependency areas (respiratory and renal). Cascade training in these areas was used to support implementation.”

Source location

Response from University Hospital of Derby and Burton
Page 3 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

UHDB considers established transfer, admission-assessment and information-sharing processes sufficient to support safe information exchange between care providers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The information from the transferring care provider is taken into consideration by the Trust, but it is not decisive. On admission to the Trust staff should complete further assessments to assess the patient's abilities and needs at that specific time, including mental capacity and falls risk assessment.”

Source location

Response from University Hospital of Derby and Burton
Page 2 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

DCHS considers its established Admission, Discharge and Transfer Policy and SBAR process sufficient for safe patient transfers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In line with the evidence already submitted to the Court, DCHS staff are required to follow the procedures set out in the Trusts Admission, Discharge and Transfer Policy for DCHS Community Hospitals Policy. The Policy is in place to support well organised, safe and timely admissions, discharges and transfers for all patients. The Policy (attached) also covers emergency transfers such as was the case for Mr Perkins.”

Source location

Response from University Hospital of Derby and Burton
Page 2 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026