PFD report

Edwin Everett Milne Price · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Aug 2025•Somerset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to address gaps in the falls risk assessment and management process for patients admitted from care homes
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
  2. Failure to complete falls risk assessments within the first 24 hours of ward admission
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risksPart of recurring concern: Unreliable admission assessment of patientsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable completion of admission documentation
  3. Lack of falls risk mitigation measures
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Require falls risk assessments within 12 hours of admission, with weekly or condition-triggered reviews, and display patient risk status at the bedside.

    Stated by Somerset NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 September 2025.
  2. Action

    Use an acute medical unit admission checklist to contact families, care homes or community hospitals and gather baseline information for risk mitigation.

    Stated by Somerset NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 September 2025.
  3. Action

    Review reported incidents daily and verify that measures and steps have been taken to mitigate further patient harm.

    Stated by Somerset NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 September 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to address gaps in the falls risk assessment and management process for patients admitted from care homes

Wider context from the report

“1. The falls risk assessment was not completed within the first 24 hours of admission to the ward. 2. Had it been completed, the risk assessment would have involved obtaining information from the nursing home as Mr Price was unable to communicate. 3. A risk assessment would have identified Mr Price’s specific risk of falling out of bed. 4. The lack of a risk assessment meant that mitigation measures were not in place. 5. The lack of mitigation measures made a more than minimal contribution to the extent of Mr Price’s injuries and therefore to his death. 6. No subsequent action has been taken by the ward to address the gaps in the falls risk assessment and management process when patients are admitted from care homes. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete falls risk assessments within the first 24 hours of ward admission

Wider context from the report

“1. The falls risk assessment was not completed within the first 24 hours of admission to the ward. 2. Had it been completed, the risk assessment would have involved obtaining information from the nursing home as Mr Price was unable to communicate. 3. A risk assessment would have identified Mr Price’s specific risk of falling out of bed. 4. The lack of a risk assessment meant that mitigation measures were not in place. 5. The lack of mitigation measures made a more than minimal contribution to the extent of Mr Price’s injuries and therefore to his death. 6. No subsequent action has been taken by the ward to address the gaps in the falls risk assessment and management process when patients are admitted from care homes. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Unreliable admission assessment of patients; Unreliable completion of admission documentation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of falls risk mitigation measures

Wider context from the report

“1. The falls risk assessment was not completed within the first 24 hours of admission to the ward. 2. Had it been completed, the risk assessment would have involved obtaining information from the nursing home as Mr Price was unable to communicate. 3. A risk assessment would have identified Mr Price’s specific risk of falling out of bed. 4. The lack of a risk assessment meant that mitigation measures were not in place. 5. The lack of mitigation measures made a more than minimal contribution to the extent of Mr Price’s injuries and therefore to his death. 6. No subsequent action has been taken by the ward to address the gaps in the falls risk assessment and management process when patients are admitted from care homes. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to obtain nursing home information for falls risk assessments when admitted patients are unable to communicate

Wider context from the report

“1. The falls risk assessment was not completed within the first 24 hours of admission to the ward. 2. Had it been completed, the risk assessment would have involved obtaining information from the nursing home as Mr Price was unable to communicate. 3. A risk assessment would have identified Mr Price’s specific risk of falling out of bed. 4. The lack of a risk assessment meant that mitigation measures were not in place. 5. The lack of mitigation measures made a more than minimal contribution to the extent of Mr Price’s injuries and therefore to his death. 6. No subsequent action has been taken by the ward to address the gaps in the falls risk assessment and management process when patients are admitted from care homes. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to obtain relevant collateral information from family and social supports.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require falls risk assessments within 12 hours of admission, with weekly or condition-triggered reviews, and display patient risk status at the bedside.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In April 2023 Somerset NHS Foundation Trust (SFT) and Yeovil District Hospital (YDH) merged organisations to become one Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, and there has been a period, ongoing, where there has been alignment of policies and guidance across the new Somerset NHS FT organisation. At the time of Mr Price’s fall, colleagues in YDH were still working to the legacy policy in place which did not have a time frame in which a Falls Risk assessment was to be completed. The legacy Somerset FT policy and the newly merged one organisational Somerset FT policy both state that an individual must have a Falls Risk Assessment within 12 hours of admission to an inpatient ward, and that this is reviewed if the person moves to another inpatient ward / has a fall / their condition changes.”

Source location

Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use an acute medical unit admission checklist to contact families, care homes or community hospitals and gather baseline information for risk mitigation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to this incident, our acute medical unit (AMU) has introduced a checklist to be completed on admission which involves contacting the patient’s family, care home or community hospital to gather more detailed information about the patient (see appendix 1). The guidance on the patient’s baseline function and the usual mitigations that are in place in their usual residence to reduce the risk of harm”

Source location

Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 2 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review reported incidents daily and verify that measures and steps have been taken to mitigate further patient harm.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have launched a test of change with a 5 day a week supernumerary role, titled the Quality and Safety Lead Nurse (2 full time posts) within the medical services group, with clear aims, objectives and job planning, this will follow QI methodology and falls will be part of their patient safety remit. The ADPC and Deputy support a daily review of all incidents reported and the matrons will also review and ensure that all measures and steps have been taken to mitigate any further risk of harm for the patients in our care.”

Source location

Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 2 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor falls risk assessment compliance through monthly Core Nursing Metrics audits and additional spot audits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Deputy Associate Director of Patient Care (ADPC), Matron and Ward Managers are monitoring compliance with the completion of the falls risk assessments and although these are audited monthly through our Core Nursing Metrics, additional spot audits are also being undertaken. These have shown an increase in compliance, however further strengthening in this area is required to ensure an embedded and sustained process of compliance with the expected 12-hour target.”

Source location

Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve Intentional Rounding through role modelling, a patient-centred real-time documentation tool and rollout of the new form across the acute medical unit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We acknowledge also that an appropriate risk assessment on admission would have assisted us to identify Mr Price’s risk more clearly and put sufficient mitigations in place to reduce the risk of harm to him. In addition to the risk assessment, to help us reduce risk to patients, we use an Intentional Rounding tool to assist with care planning and patient involvement. At a minimum a patient is seen two hourly and engaged with, this is in addition to physical observations. From our recent reviews, including learning from Mr Price’s case, it has become clear that there has been a lack of clarity around the purpose and process associated with the meaningful delivery of Intentional Rounding across the Trust.”

Source location

Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 2 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Allocate medical matrons 20% of weekly time to clinical ward work supporting training, high-risk patient identification, ward rounds and safety huddles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The medical matrons are now working 20% of their time clinically on our wards each week, supporting with training and education and supporting with the identification of our high-risk patients and are leading ward rounds and safety huddles with the ward senior leadership team.”

Source location

Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 2 September 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Operate a personalised care improvement group and identify ward projects supporting patient, family and carer involvement in decisions.

    Stated by Somerset NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 September 2025.
  2. 2

    Conduct patient and relative engagement walk rounds across medical wards during visiting hours.

    Stated by Somerset NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 September 2025.
  3. 3

    Test two full-time supernumerary Quality and Safety Lead Nurse posts five days a week, including falls within their patient-safety remit.

    Stated by Somerset NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 September 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a personalised care improvement group and identify ward projects supporting patient, family and carer involvement in decisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has established a personalised care improvement group that is focusing on the ‘no decision about me without me’ programme. This work is being led by Clare Boobyer-Jones, Director of Allied Health Professions, and will be based on good communication with patients and those that matter to them. The basis for this is understanding what matters to patients, families and carers and ensuring that they are able to participate in decision making. We are actively identifying projects across our wards to help deliver care in this way.”

Source location

Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 2 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct patient and relative engagement walk rounds across medical wards during visiting hours.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Within our medical service group, the ADPC for medicine, Deputy ADPC and Matrons are carrying out patient and relative engagement walk rounds across all our wards, during visiting hours, this has been very positive and allows us to hear about areas of notable good practice and areas of concerns that need to be addressed.”

Source location

Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 2 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Test two full-time supernumerary Quality and Safety Lead Nurse posts five days a week, including falls within their patient-safety remit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have launched a test of change with a 5 day a week supernumerary role, titled the Quality and Safety Lead Nurse (2 full time posts) within the medical services group, with clear aims, objectives and job planning, this will follow QI methodology and falls will be part of their patient safety remit. The ADPC and Deputy support a daily review of all incidents reported and the matrons will also review and ensure that all measures and steps have been taken to mitigate any further risk of harm for the patients in our care.”

Source location

Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 2 September 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026