HOLLY CHEVASSUT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Dec 2020•Coventry and Warwickshire

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to limit mirrors and guards to 20 centimetres from the widest part of vehicles
  2. Failure to maintain mirrors and guards at least 2 metres from the road surface

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. GRS Recovery Warwickshire Ltd

    Rotate both wing mirrors on Vehicles 1 and 2 by 180 degrees to reduce their projection below 20 centimetres.

  2. GRS Recovery Warwickshire Ltd

    Apply the mirror-modification procedure to vehicles purchased in future.

  3. GRS Recovery Warwickshire Ltd

    Remove wing-mirror protectors from all vehicles under two metres high.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to limit mirrors and guards to 20 centimetres from the widest part of vehicles

Wider context from the report

“(1) GRS continues to operate vehicles with mirrors and guards the height of which are under 2 ms from the road surface and which project more than 20 cms from the widest part of those vehicles. Such a configuration creates a risk of personal injury and death to people overtaken by these vehicles. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain mirrors and guards at least 2 metres from the road surface

Wider context from the report

“(1) GRS continues to operate vehicles with mirrors and guards the height of which are under 2 ms from the road surface and which project more than 20 cms from the widest part of those vehicles. Such a configuration creates a risk of personal injury and death to people overtaken by these vehicles. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Rotate both wing mirrors on Vehicles 1 and 2 by 180 degrees to reduce their projection below 20 centimetres.

Verbatim wording from the response

“13. Therefore, in order to reduce the width of the wing mirrors GRS Recovery has rotated both offside and near side wing mirrors 180 degrees. This places the longer area which faced outwards from the tubular metal frame inward and vice versa. Consequently, this reduces the width of the wing mirrors. GRS Recovery provides the following examples from the offside and nearside mirrors of Vehicle 2 in Photos B and C.”

Source location

2020-0303-Response-from-GRS-Recovery-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 14 January 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Apply the mirror-modification procedure to vehicles purchased in future.

Verbatim wording from the response

“13. Therefore, in order to reduce the width of the wing mirrors GRS Recovery has rotated both offside and near side wing mirrors 180 degrees. This places the longer area which faced outwards from the tubular metal frame inward and vice versa. Consequently, this reduces the width of the wing mirrors. GRS Recovery provides the following examples from the offside and nearside mirrors of Vehicle 2 in Photos B and C.”

Source location

2020-0303-Response-from-GRS-Recovery-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 14 January 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remove wing-mirror protectors from all vehicles under two metres high.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Methods undertaken to reduce the width of the wing-mirrors.”

Source location

2020-0303-Response-from-GRS-Recovery-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 14 January 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026