PFD report

Maureen Gilbert · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Sep 2025•Derby and Derbyshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
19

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of flood defences at Tapton Terrace
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of flood risk to residents in flood-prone areas
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.15

  1. Action

    Explore the feasibility of constructing a Spital Brook Flood Alleviation Scheme providing upstream attenuation during heavy rainfall.

    Stated by Derbyshire County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 September 2025.
  2. Action

    Explore the feasibility of removing the access bridge, using Environment Agency modelling and evidence to assess whether removal would reduce flood risk.

    Stated by Derbyshire County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 September 2025.
  3. Action

    Submit grant funding bids to support a feasibility study for a Spital Brook Flood Alleviation Scheme.

    Stated by Derbyshire County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 September 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.7

  1. Position

    Bridge removal cannot yet be considered without Environment Agency modelling and evidence demonstrating that it would reduce flood risk.

    Stated by Derbyshire County CouncilUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of flood defences at Tapton Terrace

Wider context from the report

“Following the flood damage to Tapton Terrace in 2007, the Environment Agency’s pre-feasibility study identified a number of technically feasible options that would reduce the flood risk at Tapton Terrace. None of these measures were implemented principally due to cost reasons. When Storm Babet hit in October 2023, Tapton Terrace remained in the same position that it was in back in 2007. Due to the ongoing lack of flood defences, Tapton Terrace remains vulnerable to flooding. I am concerned that this gives rise to a risk to life, particularly in respect of residents who may be elderly, vulnerable or immobile. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of flood risk to residents in flood-prone areas.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore the feasibility of constructing a Spital Brook Flood Alleviation Scheme providing upstream attenuation during heavy rainfall.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DCC is also exploring the feasibility of constructing a Flood Alleviation Scheme on the Spital Brook, which is an ordinary watercourse (rather than a main river) and would therefore fall under the remit of DCC as the Lead Local Flood Authority to consider, rather than the EA. The scheme would provide upstream attenuation in times of heavy rainfall, thereby potentially reducing the flood risk further downstream, at the point it connects into the River Rother. To date, two grant funding bids have been submitted which would fund the feasibility study of such a scheme. The outcome of these two bids is expected to be around February/March 2026. It’s worth noting that a scheme of this magnitude would take approximately 5 to 10 years to deliver and is subject to appropriate funding being made available.”

Source location

Response from Derbyshire County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore the feasibility of removing the access bridge, using Environment Agency modelling and evidence to assess whether removal would reduce flood risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DCC is currently exploring the feasibility of removing an access bridge, which is located over the River Rother, just to the south of Tapton Terrace. The access bridge is public highway and is the responsibility of the authority to manage and maintain. Removal of the access bridge may provide a benefit in terms of reducing the flood risk to Tapton Terrace and surrounding flood areas. There would be a requirement to utilise the EA’s modelling and expertise, in order to evidence that removal of the bridge will actually reduce the flood risk. To explain what modelling is, the EA have river models which simulate the flows and depths over a range of different storm events, which can be used to aid feasibility and design of a flood risk scheme.”

Source location

Response from Derbyshire County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Submit grant funding bids to support a feasibility study for a Spital Brook Flood Alleviation Scheme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DCC is also exploring the feasibility of constructing a Flood Alleviation Scheme on the Spital Brook, which is an ordinary watercourse (rather than a main river) and would therefore fall under the remit of DCC as the Lead Local Flood Authority to consider, rather than the EA. The scheme would provide upstream attenuation in times of heavy rainfall, thereby potentially reducing the flood risk further downstream, at the point it connects into the River Rother. To date, two grant funding bids have been submitted which would fund the feasibility study of such a scheme. The outcome of these two bids is expected to be around February/March 2026. It’s worth noting that a scheme of this magnitude would take approximately 5 to 10 years to deliver and is subject to appropriate funding being made available.”

Source location

Response from Derbyshire County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Carry out updated modelling in 2026 to support Derbyshire County Council’s study of the flood-risk benefits of removing Crow Lane Bridge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are working with Derbyshire County Council to support them with their investigations into the removal of the Crow Lane Bridge, which is a County Council adopted highway asset. In 2026, we will include updated modelling work as part of the study to be prepared by the County Council in order to assist their technical understanding of the flood risk benefits of removing the bridge. As noted in the Pre-Feasibility Study in 2008, removal of the bridge may provide some limited benefit to the area immediately upstream of Tapton Terrace itself.”

Source location

Response from Environment Agency
Page 3 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue winter maintenance walkovers of the river channel at Tapton Terrace and take action on identified vegetation-management needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will continue to carry out winter maintenance walkovers of the river channel at Tapton Terrace to check the need for vegetation management as part of our ongoing risk management of main river channels and take action accordingly.”

Source location

Response from Environment Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lead appraisal of the River Hipper Flood Alleviation Scheme to assess upstream floodwater storage and potential flood-risk reduction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are currently leading the appraisal of the River Hipper Flood Alleviation Scheme. The scheme would contribute to a further reduction in flood risk to the community at Tapton Terrace through the storage of floodwaters upstream, thereby reducing peak flows.”

Source location

Response from Environment Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Replaced and launched the more advanced, user-focused and resilient ‘Get flood warnings’ service on GOV.UK.

Verbatim wording from the response

“After flood events we validate the accuracy of our flood warnings and make improvements where necessary. Over time we also improve our IT systems that provide the warnings and improve our flood forecasting models that predict the timing and extent of flooding. In response to the increasing challenges posed by future flood risks we have replaced our existing ‘Sign up for flood warnings’ service on GOV.UK with a more advanced, user-focused, and resilient service.”

Source location

Response from Environment Agency
Page 3 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conducted river-channel surveys in 2024 to compare the Tapton Terrace channel profile with earlier surveys and inform flood-risk management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you know from the evidence we presented, the Agency carried out river channel surveys in 2024 following Storm Babet in order to compare the river channel against earlier surveys carried out in 2011. The 2024 surveys demonstrated that the profile of the river channel has remained static with negligible changes over the period since 2011. Based upon this evidence, we remain of the view that dredging the river channel at Tapton Terrace would not provide any flood risk benefit to the community. If there is a more significant increase in the level of the riverbed or other significant changes in profile in the future, then the Agency would work with riparian owners to assess whether dredging works would be possible and take action where necessary.”

Source location

Response from Environment Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commence a Strategic Outline Case study in 2026 to reassess technically feasible, environmentally acceptable and cost-beneficial flood-defence options at Tapton Terrace.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, from April 2026 we anticipate that revised appraisal and funding rules will be brought into effect that might result in a different outcome at pre-feasibility stage. Therefore, we propose to undertake a further study (now referred to as Strategic Outline Case) to reassess the technically feasible, environmentally acceptable, and cost beneficial flood defence options at Tapton Terrace under the new rules when in force. The study will involve carrying out updated modelling and appraisal work. We are of course unable to predict the outcome of the study or guarantee that this will result in a feasible and affordable flood defence scheme being delivered at Tapton Terrace, however we will commence the process of undertaking the study in 2026.”

Source location

Response from Environment Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue improving Flood Warning Service systems and processes, including working with communities to increase warning-service sign-up rates.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Agency will continue to take action to improve our systems and processes in order to provide the best Flood Warning Service that we can, which includes working with communities to improve sign-up rates. We will continue to work with national experts and decision makers to improve flood resilience and to create climate resilience in line with our national flood and coastal erosion risk management strategy.”

Source location

Response from Environment Agency
Page 3 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with flood-risk partners to develop natural flood-management and storage schemes upstream within the River Rother catchment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are continuing to work with flood risk partners such as Derbyshire County Council to develop other flood alleviation schemes, including further natural flood management and storage within the River Rother catchment upstream of Tapton Terrace. Such an approach is consistent with the Agency’s Catchment Flood Management Plan for Chesterfield.”

Source location

Response from Environment Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Meet Derbyshire County Council and Environment Agency leaders to discuss flood protection in Chesterfield before winter.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Moving forward from here, as Minister for Water and Flooding, I remain committed to helping increase the resilience of Tapton Terrace, Chesterfield and the whole country to flooding. Having met with Toby Perkins MP, I will also meet with Chris Henning (Executive Director at Derbyshire County Council) and Philip Duffy (Chief Executive at the Environment Agency) to discuss flood protection in Chesterfield ahead of this winter.”

Source location

Response from Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
Page 3 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase investment in flood-risk reduction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Flooding devastates communities. We take our responsibility in reducing these risks extremely seriously and we have acted to increase investment, change the rules around how funding for flooding is allocated and set up a Flood Resilience Taskforce to improve how prepared the country is for flooding.”

Source location

Response from Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Change the rules governing allocation of flood-risk funding.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Flooding devastates communities. We take our responsibility in reducing these risks extremely seriously and we have acted to increase investment, change the rules around how funding for flooding is allocated and set up a Flood Resilience Taskforce to improve how prepared the country is for flooding.”

Source location

Response from Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Press the Environment Agency Chief Executive to undertake a Strategic Outline Case for Tapton Terrace in 2026.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Taking into account the findings from your report, the fact that 18 years have passed since the last pre-feasibility study and with the introduction of new appraisal and funding rules, I agree with the Environment Agency’s conclusion that a new pre-feasibility study (which is now referred to as a Strategic Outline Case) should be taken forward and will underline to the Environment Agency’s Chief Executive, when we next meet, that this should be undertaken in 2026. As the Environment Agency’s response sets out, if a viable option is identified, it can then be considered for funding under the new, more straightforward funding rules, which take effect in April 2026.”

Source location

Response from Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
Page 2 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Bridge removal cannot yet be considered without Environment Agency modelling and evidence demonstrating that it would reduce flood risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DCC is currently exploring the feasibility of removing an access bridge, which is located over the River Rother, just to the south of Tapton Terrace. The access bridge is public highway and is the responsibility of the authority to manage and maintain. Removal of the access bridge may provide a benefit in terms of reducing the flood risk to Tapton Terrace and surrounding flood areas. There would be a requirement to utilise the EA’s modelling and expertise, in order to evidence that removal of the bridge will actually reduce the flood risk. To explain what modelling is, the EA have river models which simulate the flows and depths over a range of different storm events, which can be used to aid feasibility and design of a flood risk scheme.”

Source location

Response from Derbyshire County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Flood mitigation schemes depend on government grant funding, and delivery cannot proceed without appropriate funding being available.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DCC is also exploring the feasibility of constructing a Flood Alleviation Scheme on the Spital Brook, which is an ordinary watercourse (rather than a main river) and would therefore fall under the remit of DCC as the Lead Local Flood Authority to consider, rather than the EA. The scheme would provide upstream attenuation in times of heavy rainfall, thereby potentially reducing the flood risk further downstream, at the point it connects into the River Rother. To date, two grant funding bids have been submitted which would fund the feasibility study of such a scheme. The outcome of these two bids is expected to be around February/March 2026. It’s worth noting that a scheme of this magnitude would take approximately 5 to 10 years to deliver and is subject to appropriate funding being made available.”

Source location

Response from Derbyshire County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for managing flood risk from the River Rother main river rests primarily with the Environment Agency.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Derbyshire County Council (“DCC”) in its capacity as Lead Local Flood Authority (Floods and Water Management Act 2010) has the lead responsibility for managing local flood risk, from surface water, groundwater and ordinary watercourses. The Environment Agency is responsible for taking a strategic overview of the management of all sources of flooding and coastal erosion.”

Source location

Response from Derbyshire County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Compulsory purchase of Tapton Terrace properties cannot be undertaken because no feasible flood scheme requires their removal.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Compulsory purchase is a legal function that allows certain public bodies to acquire land or rights over land for a specific purpose, if the landowner is not willing to sell by agreement. Conceivably, the appropriate public body could seek to compulsory purchase all the properties at Tapton Terrace in order to eliminate the risk to life from flooding at this location. The purchase of the properties would be carried out through a Compulsory Purchase Order. The Environment Agency has compulsory purchase powers, but these can only be used as part of the delivery of a flood risk management scheme, for example where a flood defence needs to be built in the same location of an existing property. As there is currently no feasible flood scheme at Tapton Terrace requiring the removal of the houses, we would not be able to use our compulsory purchase powers in this instance.”

Source location

Response from Environment Agency
Page 3 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Based on 2024 surveys, dredging the river channel would not provide flood-risk benefit to Tapton Terrace.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Improving the capacity of a river channel can help to reduce flood risk by improving channel conveyance. Improvements can include raising the height of, or removing, constraints such as bridges. Improvements can also include maintenance activities such as dredging and vegetation management. Before being carried out, the Agency would consider any downstream impacts that might arise so that flood risk is not increased downstream, as well an assessment of their overall sustainability.”

Source location

Response from Environment Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Flood defence options cannot currently be delivered because appraisal rules and increased construction costs make them unaffordable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Tapton Terrace Pre-Feasibility Study from April 2008 recommended that the proposed storage areas on the River Hipper and at the Avenue were taken forward to feasibility stage or beyond. The Pre-Feasibility Study confirmed that there were no affordable options to deliver flood defences at Tapton Terrace. Based upon the existing appraisal and funding rules that must be followed, together with the huge increase in construction costs in recent years, the options remain unaffordable.”

Source location

Response from Environment Agency
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Dredging the river channel at Tapton Terrace would not provide flood-risk benefit, based on the Environment Agency’s 2024 evidence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Dredging is one further option considered by the Environment Agency. Dredging and main river clearance is an important part of the Environment Agency’s wider annual programme of channel maintenance work. Before undertaking dredging, the Environment Agency works in close consultation with local communities to assess whether it is technically achievable, cost effective, and does not significantly increase flood risk for others downstream. The response from Environment Agency explains why, on the basis of evidence from 2024, they believe dredging the river channel at Tapton Terrace would not provide any flood risk benefit to the community.”

Source location

Response from Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
Page 3 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Review and develop Chesterfield flood plans and evacuation procedures where necessary.

    Stated by Derbyshire County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 September 2025.
  2. 2

    Engage local residents through the Derbyshire Resilience Partnership Flood Group and encourage sign-up for flood warnings.

    Stated by Derbyshire County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 September 2025.
  3. 3

    Continue working with national experts and decision-makers to improve flood resilience and climate resilience.

    Stated by Environment AgencyStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 September 2025.
  4. 4

    Establish a Flood Resilience Taskforce to improve national flood preparedness.

    Stated by Department for Environment, Food & Rural AffairsStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 September 2025.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Potential Compulsory Purchase Orders for Tapton Terrace should initially be discussed with the local council.

    Stated by Department for Environment, Food & Rural AffairsRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and develop Chesterfield flood plans and evacuation procedures where necessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DCC will continue to work collaboratively with the EA, through the Derbyshire Resilience Partnership (DRP) Flood Group. This will include working closely on local engagement, encouraging residents to sign up to receive flood warnings. The DRP Flood Group will review existing flood plans and evacuation procedures for the Chesterfield area, developing these where necessary.”

Source location

Response from Derbyshire County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage local residents through the Derbyshire Resilience Partnership Flood Group and encourage sign-up for flood warnings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DCC will continue to work collaboratively with the EA, through the Derbyshire Resilience Partnership (DRP) Flood Group. This will include working closely on local engagement, encouraging residents to sign up to receive flood warnings. The DRP Flood Group will review existing flood plans and evacuation procedures for the Chesterfield area, developing these where necessary.”

Source location

Response from Derbyshire County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with national experts and decision-makers to improve flood resilience and climate resilience.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are an important member of the Floods Resilience Taskforce which has been set up to improve our preparedness for, and resilience to, all types of flooding affecting people, homes, and businesses. The Floods Resilience Taskforce brings together experts and decision makers from across UK Government, non-governmental bodies, and industry organisations at local and national level. It includes stakeholders that are involved in all stages of flooding resilience, including preparedness, response, and recovery.”

Source location

Response from Environment Agency
Page 3 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a Flood Resilience Taskforce to improve national flood preparedness.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Flooding devastates communities. We take our responsibility in reducing these risks extremely seriously and we have acted to increase investment, change the rules around how funding for flooding is allocated and set up a Flood Resilience Taskforce to improve how prepared the country is for flooding.”

Source location

Response from Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Potential Compulsory Purchase Orders for Tapton Terrace should initially be discussed with the local council.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have discussed these issues with the constituency MP for Chesterfield. In June of this year, I responded to a debate in Parliament called by Toby Perkins MP about flooding in his constituency. I also met with him last week, on 26 October, to discuss Tapton Terrace. One of the issues raised by Toby Perkins was the potential for Compulsory Purchase Orders in relation to Tapton Terrace. I suggested to him that this would be something to discuss with the local council in the first instance. I agreed to remain in touch about potential options ahead.”

Source location

Response from Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
Page 3 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026