PFD report

Janet SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Apr 2023•Leicester City and South Leicestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
11

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to monitor residents when carers attend competing care needs
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably supervise and monitor residents in care accommodation
  2. Insufficient staffing capacity to meet competing resident care and monitoring needs
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably supervise and monitor residents in care accommodationPart of recurring concern: Insufficient care-home staffing capacity for residents’ required care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Install and use bedroom sensor mats and CCTV cameras to detect and monitor residents’ movement.

    Stated by PINE VIEW CARE HOMES LTDStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 May 2023.
  2. Action

    Continuously assess residents’ dependency and care needs to determine required staffing hours and mitigate risks.

    Stated by PINE VIEW CARE HOMES LTDStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 May 2023.
  3. Action

    Update and implement policies covering staffing hours, slips, trips and falls, observations, and general risk assessments.

    Stated by PINE VIEW CARE HOMES LTDStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 May 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing staffing, monitoring, policies, training and environmental controls are considered sufficient to keep residents safe and mitigate falling risks.

    Stated by PINE VIEW CARE HOMES LTDExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to monitor residents when carers attend competing care needs

Wider context from the report

“At the time of Mrs. Smith's fall, there were 17 residents and 2 carers. One carer was attending a resident upstairs and the other carer was outside the care home accompanying another resident who wished to have a cigarette. This meant that no carer was in the lounge area monitoring the residents. Accordingly, when Mrs. Smith left the lounge area she was not monitored as required. If she had been monitored, it is understood that she would have been offered assistance and, on a balance of probabilities, the fall that led to her death would not have occurred. It was understood that at the care home there were, and still is, a number of residents with challenging behaviour and care needs, and that for some activities of daily living 2 carers may be required. With only 2 carers on a shift, it is foreseeable that residents can and will be left unattended. It is also foreseeable that competing needs of the residents will mean that residents will be left unmonitored, and an unsafe environment created as occurred with Mrs. Smith. Accordingly, there remains a concern that the provider has not done everything possible to mitigate the risk of actual or potential harm including death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably supervise and monitor residents in care accommodation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient staffing capacity to meet competing resident care and monitoring needs

Wider context from the report

“At the time of Mrs. Smith's fall, there were 17 residents and 2 carers. One carer was attending a resident upstairs and the other carer was outside the care home accompanying another resident who wished to have a cigarette. This meant that no carer was in the lounge area monitoring the residents. Accordingly, when Mrs. Smith left the lounge area she was not monitored as required. If she had been monitored, it is understood that she would have been offered assistance and, on a balance of probabilities, the fall that led to her death would not have occurred. It was understood that at the care home there were, and still is, a number of residents with challenging behaviour and care needs, and that for some activities of daily living 2 carers may be required. With only 2 carers on a shift, it is foreseeable that residents can and will be left unattended. It is also foreseeable that competing needs of the residents will mean that residents will be left unmonitored, and an unsafe environment created as occurred with Mrs. Smith. Accordingly, there remains a concern that the provider has not done everything possible to mitigate the risk of actual or potential harm including death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably supervise and monitor residents in care accommodation; Insufficient care-home staffing capacity for residents’ required care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install and use bedroom sensor mats and CCTV cameras to detect and monitor residents’ movement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also installed sensor mats in bedrooms, for those residents deemed at high risk of falls, with their consent or through a DOLS application allowing the care home to deprive residents due to having no capacity, and CCTV cameras throughout the home to enable management to monitor and observe the movement of residents.”

Source location

Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
Page 4 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continuously assess residents’ dependency and care needs to determine required staffing hours and mitigate risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Each of our residents require different levels of support and care. Accordingly, their dependency levels (i.e. the amount of time staff should spend with each client) can differ at different times. We continuously review and monitor our residents’ support and care needs and these needs are then graded using our dependency level formula to establish the number of hours staff are required to spend with each resident.”

Source location

Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
Page 2 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update and implement policies covering staffing hours, slips, trips and falls, observations, and general risk assessments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have reviewed our policies and procedures and, for the benefit of the Coroner, we attach the following updated polices and a staffing hours analysis:”

Source location

Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
Page 2 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct regular staff training on the risks of leaving residents unmonitored or unattended.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the above, we will conduct regular training sessions for all staff to ensure that all members of staff are educated about the potential risks and harm from leaving residents unmonitored / unattended and their knowledge is kept up to date.”

Source location

Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
Page 5 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Apply graduated resident-observation procedures, including overnight monitoring and immediate response to sensor alerts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At times, a resident’s mood and behaviour pattern fluctuates and they may be required to be observed at increased levels to ensure their own safety, the safety of other residents and the safety of staff. Staff and management conduct a risk assessment for residents which is then regularly reviewed by management and staff to ensure the appropriate level of observation is in place for the resident’s needs at any particular time.”

Source location

Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
Page 3 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Employ a third daytime staff member to maintain lounge supervision and assist residents across the home.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We now employ a third member of staff during the day from 9a.m. to 7.00p.m. Sometimes 2 staff members are required to assist residents located in different areas of the care home and to bring residents to different parts of the home for various reasons. A third member of staff remains in the lounge area at all times to monitor and assist residents. Therefore, a member of staff will be present in the lounge room to care for and monitor residents and ensure that residents are not left unattended. This will hopefully assist in trying to mitigate the risk of residents falling in the future as someone will always be present to monitor, assist and tend to residents at all times.”

Source location

Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
Page 3 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing staffing, monitoring, policies, training and environmental controls are considered sufficient to keep residents safe and mitigate falling risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“These above policies will hopefully ensure that residents are not left unattended or unmonitored and the risks of residents slipping, tripping and falling is minimised in the future. We believe that residents are safe, they live in a safe environment and they are supported by dedicated staff who are appropriately trained and are capable of assisting residents in the event of a fall.”

Source location

Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
Page 4 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Continue assessing residents who use the stairs and provide stairgate training and staff supervision where consent is given.

    Stated by PINE VIEW CARE HOMES LTDStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 May 2023.
  2. 2

    Install stairgates at the top and bottom of the staircase to prevent unsupervised stair use.

    Stated by PINE VIEW CARE HOMES LTDStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 May 2023.
  3. 3

    Keep safety policies under review and make beneficial changes for residents’ health and safety.

    Stated by PINE VIEW CARE HOMES LTDStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 3 May 2023.
  4. 4

    Provide slips, trips and falls training to all staff, covering prevention, hazards, responses and consequences.

    Stated by PINE VIEW CARE HOMES LTDStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 May 2023.
  5. 5

    Familiarize staff with general risk-assessment and slips, trips and falls policies and their safety duties.

    Stated by PINE VIEW CARE HOMES LTDStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 May 2023.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Falls among elderly care-home residents are characterised as inherently dangerous, unpredictable and unforeseeable, and therefore not completely preventable.

    Stated by PINE VIEW CARE HOMES LTDDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue assessing residents who use the stairs and provide stairgate training and staff supervision where consent is given.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also provided and continue to provide training to residents who are able to climb the stairs in relation to how to open and close the stairgates. Residents are assessed to ensure that they are able to do so and all residents climbing stairs are supervised by a staff member if the resident consents to this.”

Source location

Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
Page 5 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install stairgates at the top and bottom of the staircase to prevent unsupervised stair use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Two stairgates – one at the top and one at the bottom of the staircase – have been installed to prevent residents from using the stairs without assistance in order to prevent falls and for their own safety (see attached pictures).”

Source location

Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
Page 5 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Keep safety policies under review and make beneficial changes for residents’ health and safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will also keep our policies under review to ensure that any positive changes to them will be made for the benefit, health and safety of our residents.”

Source location

Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
Page 5 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide slips, trips and falls training to all staff, covering prevention, hazards, responses and consequences.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the updated policies and changes we have made as outlined above, all staff have now undergone Slips, Trips and Falls training so they are aware of how to minimise the risk of residents falling and what to do in the event of a resident falling (see attached training log). This training included:”

Source location

Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
Page 5 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Familiarize staff with general risk-assessment and slips, trips and falls policies and their safety duties.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our General Risk Assessments Policy (attached) has been designed for staff and management to assess risks, including the risks to residents when using the stairs and lift and slips, trips and falls, and how the risks identified are controlled and minimised.”

Source location

Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
Page 3 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Falls among elderly care-home residents are characterised as inherently dangerous, unpredictable and unforeseeable, and therefore not completely preventable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Unfortunately, the risk of elderly residents falling in our care home, and in care homes throughout the UK, is an inherent danger and can be an unpredictable and unforeseeable event.”

Source location

Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
Page 1 · response
Published 3 May 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026