PFD report

John Raymond EYRE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Oct 2024•Mid Kent and Medway

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of national guidance or policy on returning prisoners to custodial settings when prison healthcare concerns have not been considered by the consultant
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure safe prisoner transfersPart of recurring concern: Unsafe interoperability between prison custody and healthcare procedures
  2. Lack of a concrete escalation route for prison healthcare staff challenging the appropriateness and sustainability of acute-setting discharge
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate medical assessment and escalation for unwell prisoners
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Ask officials to consider whether hospital discharge guidance should explicitly require consideration of care-provider concerns before discharge to custodial settings.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 October 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national guidance or policy on returning prisoners to custodial settings when prison healthcare concerns have not been considered by the consultant

Wider context from the report

“(2) There was no national guidance document, or national policy in place, which outlined whether a prisoner should be returned to a custodial setting in the absence of the prison healthcare provider's concerns being considered by the patient's consultant. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure safe prisoner transfers; Unsafe interoperability between prison custody and healthcare procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a concrete escalation route for prison healthcare staff challenging the appropriateness and sustainability of acute-setting discharge

Wider context from the report

“(1) There was no concrete escalation route when prison healthcare staff challenged the appropriateness and sustainability of discharge from the acute setting. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate medical assessment and escalation for unwell prisoners.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ask officials to consider whether hospital discharge guidance should explicitly require consideration of care-provider concerns before discharge to custodial settings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As set out in the Hospital Discharge and Community Support Guidance (January 2024), NHS bodies should work closely with care providers and other partners to ensure people’s care is timely, optimal and co-ordinated, while also practising active risk management to reach a reasonable balance between safety and minimising delays when patients are ready to be discharged. I will ask my officials to consider whether an amendment to the hospital discharge guidance is required to make more explicit the obligation to consider concerns raised by care providers before the discharge of patients to custodial settings. Furthermore, as required and described in the Health and Social Care Act 2012, patients within secure settings should receive the same quality and access of healthcare as the rest of the population, both in terms of the range of interventions to meet their needs, and the quality”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 1 · response
Published 8 October 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Ask the National Regulation 28 Working Group’s regional leads to share the Trust’s learning and collaboratively developed discharge procedures with their systems.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 October 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ask the National Regulation 28 Working Group’s regional leads to share the Trust’s learning and collaboratively developed discharge procedures with their systems.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Such actions will strengthen the discharge process in similar cases within the Trust, ensuring they meet the obligations set out in legislation. NHS England’s National Regulation 28 Working Group’s seven regional leads will be asked to share the Trust’s learnings, and the collaborative development of standard operating procedures, from this incident with their systems.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 2 · response
Published 8 October 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026