PFD report

Kingsley Efosa Imafidon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 Oct 2024•North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
4

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of consideration of additional post-operative monitoring and requirements for patients with HbSS
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable post-operative monitoring and clinical review
  2. Failure of the elective liver biopsy SOP to account for patients with other pathologies such as HbSS
  3. Lack of liaison between care teams about HbSS-relevant matters before liver biopsy
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Publish advice on biopsy precautions for patients with blood disorders in a peer-reviewed journal within three months.

    Stated by British Society Of GastroenterologyStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 October 2024.
  2. Action

    Publish advice on biopsy precautions for patients with blood disorders in the BSG newsletter within one month.

    Stated by British Society Of GastroenterologyStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 October 2024.
  3. Action

    Include the Prevention of Future Deaths report in the material considered during the next review of the liver biopsy guidance.

    Stated by Royal College of RadiologistsStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 October 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Further consideration of sickle cell disease in guideline updates is assigned to the group responsible for updating the guidelines.

    Stated by Royal College of PathologistsRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of consideration of additional post-operative monitoring and requirements for patients with HbSS

Wider context from the report

“• There was no apparent liaison between the teams involved in Kingsley's care to consider any matters that may be relevant to his HbSS prior to the biopsy being carried out; • The Trust’s Standard Operating Procedure (“SOP”) for Elective Liver Biopsy does not appear to give consideration to patients with other pathologies such as HbSS; • There was no apparent consideration given to potential additional post-operative monitoring or requirements for a patient with HbSS; • The Trust’s SOP refers to a document titled “Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology” (Neuberger J, Patel J, Caldwell H et al. Gut 2020) which provides advice on liver biopsy techniques, methods and aftercare etc. These guidelines do not appear to give consideration (and therefore guidance) in relation to the use of liver biopsy for patients with other pathologies such as HbSS. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable post-operative monitoring and clinical review.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the elective liver biopsy SOP to account for patients with other pathologies such as HbSS

Wider context from the report

“• There was no apparent liaison between the teams involved in Kingsley's care to consider any matters that may be relevant to his HbSS prior to the biopsy being carried out; • The Trust’s Standard Operating Procedure (“SOP”) for Elective Liver Biopsy does not appear to give consideration to patients with other pathologies such as HbSS; • There was no apparent consideration given to potential additional post-operative monitoring or requirements for a patient with HbSS; • The Trust’s SOP refers to a document titled “Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology” (Neuberger J, Patel J, Caldwell H et al. Gut 2020) which provides advice on liver biopsy techniques, methods and aftercare etc. These guidelines do not appear to give consideration (and therefore guidance) in relation to the use of liver biopsy for patients with other pathologies such as HbSS. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of liaison between care teams about HbSS-relevant matters before liver biopsy

Wider context from the report

“• There was no apparent liaison between the teams involved in Kingsley's care to consider any matters that may be relevant to his HbSS prior to the biopsy being carried out; • The Trust’s Standard Operating Procedure (“SOP”) for Elective Liver Biopsy does not appear to give consideration to patients with other pathologies such as HbSS; • There was no apparent consideration given to potential additional post-operative monitoring or requirements for a patient with HbSS; • The Trust’s SOP refers to a document titled “Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology” (Neuberger J, Patel J, Caldwell H et al. Gut 2020) which provides advice on liver biopsy techniques, methods and aftercare etc. These guidelines do not appear to give consideration (and therefore guidance) in relation to the use of liver biopsy for patients with other pathologies such as HbSS. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of liver biopsy clinical guidelines to provide guidance for patients with other pathologies such as HbSS

Wider context from the report

“• There was no apparent liaison between the teams involved in Kingsley's care to consider any matters that may be relevant to his HbSS prior to the biopsy being carried out; • The Trust’s Standard Operating Procedure (“SOP”) for Elective Liver Biopsy does not appear to give consideration to patients with other pathologies such as HbSS; • There was no apparent consideration given to potential additional post-operative monitoring or requirements for a patient with HbSS; • The Trust’s SOP refers to a document titled “Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology” (Neuberger J, Patel J, Caldwell H et al. Gut 2020) which provides advice on liver biopsy techniques, methods and aftercare etc. These guidelines do not appear to give consideration (and therefore guidance) in relation to the use of liver biopsy for patients with other pathologies such as HbSS. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish advice on biopsy precautions for patients with blood disorders in a peer-reviewed journal within three months.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We would therefore agree that it is important to remind health care professionals that particular care must be taken in any patients with a prior history of blood disorders before any biopsy. We would encourage discussion with a consultant haematologist for anyone with any blood disorder that may predispose to extra bleeding such as sickle cell disease.”

Source location

Response from BSG
Page 1 · response
Published 16 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish advice on biopsy precautions for patients with blood disorders in the BSG newsletter within one month.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We would therefore agree that it is important to remind health care professionals that particular care must be taken in any patients with a prior history of blood disorders before any biopsy. We would encourage discussion with a consultant haematologist for anyone with any blood disorder that may predispose to extra bleeding such as sickle cell disease.”

Source location

Response from BSG
Page 1 · response
Published 16 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include the Prevention of Future Deaths report in the material considered during the next review of the liver biopsy guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This guidance was developed by the British Society of Gastroenterology in collaboration with the Royal College of Radiologists and Royal College of Pathology. At the time in which this guidance is due to be reviewed, we will facilitate expert radiological input, and we will specifically include your report in the material to consider.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Radiologists
Page 2 · response
Published 16 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the Elective Liver Biopsy SOP when further guidance is issued by the relevant professional bodies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust will of course review its SOP in light of any further guidance produced by The British Society of Gastroenterology, The Royal College of Radiologists and The Royal College of Pathology.”

Source location

Response from Homerton Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 16 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate the MDT approach and highlight the updated liver biopsy SOP to referring and booking clinicians through departmental communications and procedure-related emails.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The need to adopt a MDT approach in complex cases has been disseminated across the gastroenterology department, which is the main department referring patients for biopsies. The Trust has reviewed the process of biopsy referrals, the liver biopsy pre-assessment clinic and the patient information leaflet. This has led to the creation of a template on Electronic Patient Record (EPR) for use in the pre-assessment clinic.”

Source location

Response from Homerton Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 16 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the Elective Liver Biopsy SOP to require enhanced risk assessment, specialist MDT discussion, pre-assessment, relevant monitoring, and reference to current professional guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust’s Elective Liver Biopsy Standard Operating procedure (SOP) has been reviewed and updated in light of the concerns raised at the inquest, and the latest version was sent to Emergency Care, Medicine and Rehabilitation Services (EMRS) clinical governance meeting which was held on November 8. Within the updated SOP, Section 3 entitled ‘Vetting of Referrals’ has been amended to read as follows:”

Source location

Response from Homerton Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 16 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Further consideration of sickle cell disease in guideline updates is assigned to the group responsible for updating the guidelines.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following these discussions, we understand that the group responsible for updating the guidelines in due course is aware of this very unfortunate case. They will be entering into further discussions and consultations to consider the influence and potential inclusion of underlying conditions, such as sickle cell disease, in any future updates to the guidelines.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Pathologists
Page 1 · response
Published 16 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The guidance need not specifically mention HbSS because it addresses broader groups of patients at increased bleeding risk and requires individualized risk-benefit judgment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Within the guidelines there is detailed consideration of the different possible technical approaches for liver biopsy and also consideration of where the procedure should occur. Management of the inherent risks is not explicitly referenced at each paragraph but is the underlying reason for these considerations to inform services and operators about the relevant factors when arriving at a decision, which will include many judgement calls and should be a process approached in partnership with their patients.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Radiologists
Page 2 · response
Published 16 October 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Implement additional measures to refine the process for responding to important correspondence, including Prevention of Future Deaths reports.

    Stated by Royal College of RadiologistsStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 October 2024.
  2. 2

    Facilitate expert radiological input when the liver biopsy guidance is next reviewed.

    Stated by Royal College of RadiologistsStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 October 2024.
  3. 3

    Create an Electronic Patient Record template for use in the liver biopsy pre-assessment clinic.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 October 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement additional measures to refine the process for responding to important correspondence, including Prevention of Future Deaths reports.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I sincerely apologise for the delay in sending this response. We have reviewed the reasons for this delay, and I can confirm that we have put additional measures in place to refine our process when responding to important correspondence such as your report.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Radiologists
Page 1 · response
Published 16 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Facilitate expert radiological input when the liver biopsy guidance is next reviewed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This guidance was developed by the British Society of Gastroenterology in collaboration with the Royal College of Radiologists and Royal College of Pathology. At the time in which this guidance is due to be reviewed, we will facilitate expert radiological input, and we will specifically include your report in the material to consider.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Radiologists
Page 2 · response
Published 16 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create an Electronic Patient Record template for use in the liver biopsy pre-assessment clinic.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The need to adopt a MDT approach in complex cases has been disseminated across the gastroenterology department, which is the main department referring patients for biopsies. The Trust has reviewed the process of biopsy referrals, the liver biopsy pre-assessment clinic and the patient information leaflet. This has led to the creation of a template on Electronic Patient Record (EPR) for use in the pre-assessment clinic.”

Source location

Response from Homerton Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 16 October 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
4/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026