PFD report

Robert Andrew Power · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Jul 2018•Gloucestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to ensure that outpatients are not lost to follow-up care
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of case monitoring to identify cases requiring follow-up
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Introduce processes to arrange patient follow-up appointments.

    Stated by Bristol NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 September 2018.
  2. Action

    Introduce processes to monitor and manage patients on allocated pathways.

    Stated by Bristol NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 September 2018.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure that outpatients are not lost to follow-up care

Wider context from the report

“Robert whilst being treated as a patient by the trust was essentially lost to follow up between 2007 – 2015. No explanation was given as to why this happened. For the reasons given in my summary of evidence I determined that there was no evidence that this area of concern had any direct causative impact on Robert’s death. However in my opinion there is a risk that future deaths may occur unless action is taken to ensure that outpatients are not lost to follow up care. It is acknowledged that significant steps have already been made. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of case monitoring to identify cases requiring follow-up.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce processes to arrange patient follow-up appointments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The information provided confirms the Trust is now working under different systems than in 2008 and that processes have been introduced to arrange follow-up appointments and monitor and manage a patient on an allocated pathway.”

Source location

2018-0221-Response-by-North-Bristol-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 23 September 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce processes to monitor and manage patients on allocated pathways.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The information provided confirms the Trust is now working under different systems than in 2008 and that processes have been introduced to arrange follow-up appointments and monitor and manage a patient on an allocated pathway.”

Source location

2018-0221-Response-by-North-Bristol-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 23 September 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026