PFD report

Emmy Russo · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 May 2025•Essex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to provide complete information on the risks of induction and continuing pregnancy beyond 41 weeks
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate informed-consent processes for medical treatment
  2. Failure to ensure consistent understanding and escalation of concerns about labouring mothers and CTG traces for doctor review
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable intrapartum CTG interpretation and escalation
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Implement snap audits and regular audits of antenatal records documenting induction-of-labour discussions.

    Stated by the Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 May 2025.
  2. Action

    Make Birthrights-informed decision-making training mandatory for Consultants, resident doctors and Midwives.

    Stated by the Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 May 2025.
  3. Action

    Hire a Labour Ward, Obstetric and Simulation Lead to provide CTG interpretation and escalation simulations.

    Stated by the Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 May 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide complete information on the risks of induction and continuing pregnancy beyond 41 weeks

Wider context from the report

“(1) The evidence of the current information given to patients at 40 weeks’ pregnant on the decision over whether to accept the offer of an induction from 41 weeks does not reflect NICE guidance on the information needed by patients to make an informed choice on induction. Whilst it provides details of the risks associated with induction, it does not provide information on the risks of continuing with pregnancy beyond 41 weeks. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate informed-consent processes for medical treatment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure consistent understanding and escalation of concerns about labouring mothers and CTG traces for doctor review

Wider context from the report

“(2) The evidence given at inquest indicated a lack of understanding and/or consistency over when concerns about labouring mothers and/or the CTG trace should be escalated for doctor review. Evidence was given on the measures put in place to address issues with escalation, including “Teach or Treat” and “AID” tools, however, there was limited evidence that these are understood by the working midwives and/or advertised to them by way of regular reminders. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable intrapartum CTG interpretation and escalation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement snap audits and regular audits of antenatal records documenting induction-of-labour discussions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“06 In regards to future plans, the Trust plans to implement regular audits of antenatal records of Induction of Labour discussions. It is anticipated that these audits will take place from October 2025, once the new Patient Information Leaflet has fully been embedded. In the interim, snap Audits will take place to monitor compliance.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make Birthrights-informed decision-making training mandatory for Consultants, resident doctors and Midwives.

Verbatim wording from the response

“10 Whilst we understand that the above concern was directed at ensuring that patients are informed the risks of prolonged gestation in particular, the Trust continues to work with Birthrights to provide training to clinicians. As discussed at Inquest, Birthrights is an organisation focused on supporting patients right to choose and enabling individuals to make informed decisions about their care. The Trust plans to make this training mandatory for all Consultants, resident doctors and Midwives, with a view to start in January 2026, having been optional to this point.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hire a Labour Ward, Obstetric and Simulation Lead to provide CTG interpretation and escalation simulations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“14 In addition to this, the Trust is currently hiring a Labour Ward, Obstetric and Simulation Lead. As part of this role, the Consultant Obstetrician appointed will be responsible for providing simulations to the team which will include issues of both CTG interpretation and escalation.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 21 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish an updated induction-of-labour leaflet explaining the risks of continuing pregnancy beyond 41 weeks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The evidence of the current information given to patients at 40 weeks’ pregnant on the decision over whether to accept the offer of an induction from 41 weeks does not reflect NICE guidance on the information needed by patients to make an informed choice on induction. Whilst it provides details of the risks associated with induction, it does not provide information on the risks of continuing with pregnancy beyond 41 weeks.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 21 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Participate in the Labour Ward Coordinator Education and Development Framework to strengthen escalation leadership and skills.

Verbatim wording from the response

“17 Further to this, the Trust is actively participating in the Labour Ward Coordinator Education and Development Framework. This is a national programme, focused on strengthening the leadership of Labour Ward Coordinators. The framework aims to enhance the quality of care provided in Labour Wards and will strengthen clinicians skills to escalate care appropriately.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 21 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Embed consistent use of Teach or Treat and AID escalation tools through relaunch messaging, training, case-based learning and safety-huddle reinforcement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The evidence given at inquest indicated a lack of understanding and/or consistency over when concerns about labouring mothers and/or the CTG trace should be escalated for doctor review. Evidence was given on the measures put in place to address issues with escalation, including “Teach or Treat” and “AID” tools, however, there was limited evidence that these are understood by the working midwives and/or advertised to them by way of regular reminders.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 21 May 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Allocate CPD funding towards Active Bystander training and embedding the Civility Saves Lives campaign.

    Stated by the Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 May 2025.
  2. 2

    Collect implementation feedback through the Maternity and Neonatal Voices Partnership and antenatal clinic surveys.

    Stated by the Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 May 2025.
  3. 3

    Share induction-of-labour audit findings with the Divisional Board and Service User Forums.

    Stated by the Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 May 2025.
  4. 4

    Disseminate induction-of-labour safety messages through leadership meetings, staff huddles and the Maternity Unit Meeting.

    Stated by the Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 May 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Allocate CPD funding towards Active Bystander training and embedding the Civility Saves Lives campaign.

Verbatim wording from the response

“16 The Trust recognises the cultural and psychological factors in implementing these tools. In order to embed this practice, SLT has committed some Continuous Professional Development (CPD) funding towards “Active Bystander” training and embedding the “Civility Saves Lives” campaign at the Trust.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 21 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Collect implementation feedback through the Maternity and Neonatal Voices Partnership and antenatal clinic surveys.

Verbatim wording from the response

“08 Feedback will also be collected via the Maternity and Neonatal Voices Partnership and antenatal clinic surveys to further monitor implementation.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share induction-of-labour audit findings with the Divisional Board and Service User Forums.

Verbatim wording from the response

“07 Audit findings will be shared with the Divisional Board and Service User Forums for assurance and transparency.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate induction-of-labour safety messages through leadership meetings, staff huddles and the Maternity Unit Meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“04 In addition to the above, and whilst the above leaflet was being developed, the Maternity Leadership held a meeting immediately following the conclusion of the Inquest to inform all witnesses and the senior leadership (including the Director of Quality and Assurance for the Trust) to address the concerns raised.”

Source location

Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 May 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026