PFD report

Joseph Drew Whiteside · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Dec 2013•Staffordshire South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of adequate safety measures at main river access points
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Complete inland water safety reviews across Burton-upon-Trent and Uttoxeter to identify physical-control and management changes.

    Stated by East Staffordshire Borough CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 December 2013.
  2. Action

    Act on RoSPA recommendations to reduce risks at the eight locations rated as increased risk.

    Stated by East Staffordshire Borough CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 December 2013.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of adequate safety measures at main river access points

Wider context from the report

“Since I have been a Coroner in this jurisdiction I have held Inquests into the deaths of a number of young men who in an intoxicated state have fallen into the River Trent at Burton and drowned. I fully understand that at Burton the river does split and there are numerous access points to the water. I am told that in one or two places there are live buoys and I now wonder that if in the main access points there should be further safety measures such as fencing and/or warning signs. I should be grateful if you could carry out a review to see if any further such action should be taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete inland water safety reviews across Burton-upon-Trent and Uttoxeter to identify physical-control and management changes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Thank you for advising me of your concerns regarding access to the River Trent at Burton upon Trent, I am able to inform you that the Council appointed the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) to conduct inland water safety reviews, across Burton-upon-Trent and Uttoxeter. The review was undertaken across five days in October and November 2013.”

Source location

2013-0377-Response-by-East-Staffordshire-Borough-Council1
Page 1 · response
Published 16 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Act on RoSPA recommendations to reduce risks at the eight locations rated as increased risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Overall it was found that the average risk rating was in the “lower risk level”, eight locations were rated within the “increased risk” category. RoSPA have made recommendations to reduce the risk to an acceptable level and the Council will be acting upon these recommendations as soon as practicable.”

Source location

2013-0377-Response-by-East-Staffordshire-Borough-Council1
Page 1 · response
Published 16 December 2013

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026