PFD report

Jacob · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Jul 2021•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
17

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of a system for recording child-related discussions in radiology meetings
  2. Absence of an alert and review system for ICE results across the paediatric team
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon
  3. Lack of named or responsible consultant review before child discharge
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in consultant review of patientsPart of recurring concern: Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient carePart of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical review and authorisation of discharge decisions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.14

  1. Action

    Run radiology meetings as clinical multidisciplinary team meetings with named minute-taking, leave cover and filing of patient-specific information.

    Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 August 2021.
  2. Action

    Include recognition and management of the sick child, including sepsis screening, in Emergency Department junior-doctor induction.

    Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 August 2021.
  3. Action

    Develop and implement electronic paediatric observations, incorporating sepsis screening into Nervecentre after deployment.

    Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 3 August 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Position

    The locum doctor’s access was available; the identified problem was use of a colleague’s credentials rather than a login failure.

    Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a system for recording child-related discussions in radiology meetings

Wider context from the report

“4. No current system for recording a discussion about a child, in the Radiology meetings (where important investigations are planned) ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of an alert and review system for ICE results across the paediatric team

Wider context from the report

“3. No alert/review system for ICE results yet in place for all the Paediatric team ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of named or responsible consultant review before child discharge

Wider context from the report

“2. Lack of Named/Responsible Consultant review prior to a child’s discharge ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in consultant review of patients; Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient care; Unreliable clinical review and authorisation of discharge decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Low compliance with the paediatric sepsis screening tool

Wider context from the report

“1. Continuing low compliance with the Paediatric sepsis screening tool ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Login issues for locum doctors working at the Trust

Wider context from the report

“5. The risk of continuing Login issues when Locum doctors are working at the Trust ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital system access for temporary clinical staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Run radiology meetings as clinical multidisciplinary team meetings with named minute-taking, leave cover and filing of patient-specific information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As of 1 July 2021, radiology meetings are now clinical MDTs with meeting notes taken as by a named note taker and includes arrangements for cross cover for leave. The meeting notes are emailed to the relevant consultant, specific information related to individual patients are filed in their clinical notes.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 6 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include recognition and management of the sick child, including sepsis screening, in Emergency Department junior-doctor induction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Inclusion of “Recognition & management of the sick child” which includes sepsis in junior doctors’ induction with reference to the sepsis screening and action tool. This training is aligned with the European Paediatric Advanced Life Support (EPALS) course and is delivered by the Paediatric Emergency Medicine Consultant.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 5 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and implement electronic paediatric observations, incorporating sepsis screening into Nervecentre after deployment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A working group has been developed to evolve from ‘paper-based’ physiological observation charts to electronic observations at both Doncaster and Bassetlaw. The current Paediatric Advanced Warning Score (PAWS) charts have been shared with Nervecentre for development on the platform and the paediatric team is working closely with Nervecentre. Due to a major incident at Doncaster Royal Infirmary which has resulted in the temporary relocation of children’s inpatient services the implementation date is December 2021 which is in line with services moving into modular wards. As advised by the implementation team once the e-observations are embedded in practice, sepsis screening will then be incorporated into Nervecentre. The paper version of the sepsis screening and action tool will remain in use until that time.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Run weekly multidisciplinary paediatric simulation sessions across both sites, including paediatric sepsis topics.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Simulation sessions are run on both Doncaster and Bassetlaw sites weekly with one paediatric topic monthly, the last session on paediatric sepsis was in August. These are open for all members of the MDT they are not mandatory at present, however, ED are planning to make this a core competency for all the junior doctors during their training in ED.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 5 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver recurring Emergency Department teaching sessions on sepsis recognition, management and use of the sepsis screening tool.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Teaching sessions are delivered to junior and middle grade doctors twice in a 4 month period (junior doctors rotate every 4 months) with topics involving sepsis. This teaching session includes recognition and management of sepsis by using the sepsis screening and action tool. All junior doctors, nursing staff, advanced care practitioners (ACP), trainee ACPs and consultants can access these sessions through Microsoft Teams.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 5 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and pilot a multidisciplinary sepsis audit tool covering the pathway from Emergency Department arrival.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A sepsis audit tool Task and Finish group with MDT input from both Paediatric and ED teams has been set up to review the audit tool for sepsis management, which will audit the pathway from the point of arrival in the Emergency Department. Due to the complexity of the different referral pathways this is a complex audit tool to develop, it is currently in the final stages of development, the aim is to pilot this in Q3. For Q2 the current audit tool will be used.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Employ a Paediatric Clinical Educator for Emergency Department staff induction and sepsis-screening support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Recruitment of a Paediatric Clinical Educator specifically for ED who works closely with the Paediatric Clinical Educators who support children’s services. The Clinical Educators support new staff on induction, which includes sepsis screening and management with reference to the sepsis screening and action tool.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 5 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incorporate sepsis screening into the Emergency Department Symphony system and train staff before implementation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• ED is currently undertaking work to incorporate the sepsis screening into the Symphony system used in ED, once this is completed further monitoring of compliance can be undertaken specifically for patients that present via ED. Staff training will be delivered to the MDT once this is completed prior to ‘go live’ date which is not confirmed.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 5 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete weekly assurance audits of clinical records across acute areas, covering sepsis assessment and related discharge and communication safeguards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• In addition to the audit process, the Divisional Director of Nursing for Children & Neonates and the Matron for Children’s Services have developed an assurance tool, which is being completed weekly for a period of 12 weeks, auditing approximately 5 sets of clinical records every week from each acute area. Unlike the sepsis audit the assurance tool is not exclusive to patients with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis. The tool is designed to monitor the following which were areas of concern noted at the inquest:”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train paediatric consultants to review ICE results electronically and operate the electronic ICE system alongside a paper safety net.

Verbatim wording from the response

“ICE training has taken place for all Paediatric consultants to enable them to review results electronically, and the electronic ICE system is now operational within the Paediatric department. The results are added to the folder of the requesting clinician and are available for clinicians to view electronically. The paper system remains in place as a safety net. There is a list of radiological findings that are listed in the red and amber list which leads to direct contact of the requesting clinician by the radiology team to highlight the results of an investigation. This is a failsafe system which has been in place in radiology for many years.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 6 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate sepsis-learning and screening-tool messages through staff memoranda, the monthly Matron Newsletter and Clinical Governance meeting records.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A memo was issued by the Children’s Services Matron on 21 April 2021 to all members of the paediatric medical and nursing teams outlining actions following the SI investigation, including reference to the sepsis audit results and the need to improve compliance.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and approve the sepsis screening and action tool standard operating procedure through the specialty Clinical Governance meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The sepsis screening and action tool Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) has been reviewed in line with review date of September 2021, this is currently shared for comments and will be approved at the specialty Clinical Governance meeting in October.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor paediatric sepsis-screening compliance through quarterly audits and report results to clinical governance and quality committees.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Compliance with the Paediatric sepsis screening tool is being monitored proactively by the Paediatric Sepsis lead, Clinical Governance Lead for Paediatrics, and the Divisional Director of Nursing for Children & Neonates with the support of the clinical audit team. Results are collated at the end of each quarter and presented in a separate part of the clinical audit and effectiveness report. The current audit tool which reflects the report shared at the inquest, reviews the clinical records of all children admitted with a clinical coding of sepsis during the relevant time period. This includes children referred via the Emergency Department (ED), General Practitioner (GP) and Community Midwife (CMW).”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue mandatory induction and multidisciplinary staff-development training on paediatric sepsis recognition, management and use of the screening tool.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Sepsis awareness training will remain on the mandatory induction programme for newly appointed staff; this specifically includes reference to the paediatric sepsis tool. Ongoing training is provided to staff within Paediatrics by way of MDT staff development days, which will continue to be delivered and include sessions provided by the Paediatric Consultant Lead for sepsis. This training which commenced in 2017, references the paediatric sepsis tool within clinical scenarios. Whilst this training was stepped down during the Covid-19 pandemic it re-commenced in April 2021 via MS Teams with monthly sessions being held since then.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The locum doctor’s access was available; the identified problem was use of a colleague’s credentials rather than a login failure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. The risk of continuing Login issues when Locum doctors are working at the Trust”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 6 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Established Trust and out-of-hours processes ensure locum doctors receive necessary IT access before commencing shifts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is a Trust system which has been in place for several years to ensure locum doctors have access to the relevant and necessary IT. This system was in place prior to, and at the time of Jacob’s admission to hospital. Dr ████████, Executive Medical Director is assured that the availability of a log-in was not the issue in Jacob’s case, but the staff member, for reasons which are unclear, chose to use a colleague’s log-in details, rather than their own, which had been issued to them by the Trust in January 2014.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 6 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Electronic ICE access, paper records and radiology red-and-amber alerts provide sufficient safeguards for reviewing paediatric investigation results.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. No alert/review system for ICE results yet in place for all the Paediatric team”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 6 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consultant handovers, case discussion and retrospective attendance-note review provide sufficient safeguards for children discharged without admission.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All admitted paediatric patients are discussed with the consultant on service at each morning and evening handover as a routine practice across both sites, therefore, all admitted children are reviewed regularly by a Consultant during their admission. Patients referred that are deemed not to require admission following assessment by the ST4-8 Junior Doctor may be discussed with/reviewed by the Consultant of the week”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 5 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Immediate sepsis treatment with clear documentation makes retrospective completion of the sepsis screening tool unnecessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Comment for the patient with no sepsis screening and action tool completed for May-21: Patient brought to ED resus ASHICE cardiac arrest alert, treated immediately as sepsis, therefore sepsis screening and action tool not completed, but very clear documentation.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Improve radiology reporting and escalation processes so failsafe alerts reach relevant staff and are less likely to be missed.

    Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 August 2021.
  2. 2

    Update the Trust sepsis action plan to guide continuing patient-safety work.

    Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 August 2021.
  3. 3

    Audit post-discharge management of children with urinary tract infection against NICE standards.

    Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 August 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve radiology reporting and escalation processes so failsafe alerts reach relevant staff and are less likely to be missed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the inquest we have however worked closely with the radiology lead to make further recommendations about each system and what needs to be reported in the radiology report, as well as how to ensure that when a failsafe alert is generated it is brought to the attention of the relevant staff member. This has now led to more holistic reporting and has reduced the potential for failsafe alerts to be missed by staff.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 6 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the Trust sepsis action plan to guide continuing patient-safety work.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As outlined above, as a result of this work and learning from this Inquest, we are updating the Trust Sepsis action plan, which will help guide the continued efforts to keep our patients safe. While this is being worked on strategically, and in more detail at present, I am more than happy to share this with you once this has been agreed and signed off.”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 7 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit post-discharge management of children with urinary tract infection against NICE standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• In view of the cause of death recorded as pyelonephritis the Divisional Director of Nursing for Children & Neonates has undertaken two audits to look at management of children under 6 months and over 6 months following discharge”

Source location

2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026