PFD report

Ratidzai Kudkawashe SANGARE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 May 2016•South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to respond immediately to alarms treated as behavioural issues or false alarms
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of emergency alarm response
  2. Limited telephone access for agency staff
  3. Failure to recognise when immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation, alarm activation and ambulance summoning are required
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to call an ambulance promptly when emergency assistance is required
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to respond immediately to alarms treated as behavioural issues or false alarms

Wider context from the report

“(2) Staff did not respond immediately to alarm when it was activated, on the assumption that it was likely to be a behavioural issue or false alarm rather than a medical emergency ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of emergency alarm response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited telephone access for agency staff

Wider context from the report

“(3) Access to a telephone was limited to those with a key to the office, which did not include agency staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise when immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation, alarm activation and ambulance summoning are required

Wider context from the report

“(1) Healthcare staff were unaware or did not recognise that Mrs Sangare's condition required immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the activation of the alarm, and the summoning of an ambulance ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to call an ambulance promptly when emergency assistance is required.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.