PFD report

Mark Anthony VILLERS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Jun 2025•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Insufficient radiologist capacity for reporting CT scans
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient radiology workforce capacity for timely imaging and interpretationPart of recurring concern: Insufficient safe staffing and senior cover out of hours
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Reconfigure weekend out-of-hours radiology reporting across three hospitals by separating emergency and inpatient streams and adding reporting capacity.

    Stated by University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 June 2025.
  2. Action

    Publish a new 10 Year Workforce Plan to support appropriate NHS staffing and workforce distribution.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 June 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    The Trust considers its radiology service appropriately provisioned because it uses RCR guidance as a planning benchmark and the reconfigured workload is manageable.

    Stated by University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient radiologist capacity for reporting CT scans

Wider context from the report

“1. The investigation by the hospital trust identified that at the time of Mr Villers’ presentation to hospital on 18/05/24 there were insufficient radiologists to report the large number of CT scans undertaken over the weekend period. This was one of the root causes of the very subtle abnormality indicating aortic dissection being missed when the scan was reported. The inquest heard evidence that whilst the situation had improved the number of radiologists was still not in accordance with Royal College of radiology guidelines thus creating a risk of future deaths and in my view, action should be taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient radiology workforce capacity for timely imaging and interpretation; Insufficient safe staffing and senior cover out of hours.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reconfigure weekend out-of-hours radiology reporting across three hospitals by separating emergency and inpatient streams and adding reporting capacity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the incident and starting from 1st September 2024, the provision of out of hours radiology reporting over weekends at Heartlands, Good Hope and Solihull Hospitals, part of UHB Trust, has been reconfigured to increase capacity and reduce the workload for individual radiologists. Previously the On-Call resident and radiologist were responsible for reporting all cross-sectional scans for both the Emergency Department (ED) and inpatients and the workload, which fluctuates, would often exceed safe reporting levels.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 11 June 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish a new 10 Year Workforce Plan to support appropriate NHS staffing and workforce distribution.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In our 10 Year Health Plan we committed to publishing a new 10 Year Workforce Plan later this year. This will ensure the NHS has the right people in the right places to deliver the best care for patients.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 2 · response
Published 11 June 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust considers its radiology service appropriately provisioned because it uses RCR guidance as a planning benchmark and the reconfigured workload is manageable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The majority of our resident doctors and radiologists, who are part of this on call / acute reporting rota, have found the reconfigured system has improved their workload making it much more manageable.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 11 June 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Radiology workload may reasonably exceed RCR session figures during acute reporting, because the guidance is for departmental planning and emergency demand cannot be controlled.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) produced a guidance document to assist with departmental planning.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 11 June 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS Trusts and other employers are responsible for determining staffing levels and workforce composition, including appropriate weekend cover.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have carefully considered the situation. Individual NHS Trusts and other employers are responsible for determining staffing levels and workforce composition. They are best placed to understand their services and the needs of their patients in order to deliver safe and effective care. I would expect University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and all other NHS Trusts to ensure that their staffing arrangements, including weekend cover, are appropriate, following the tragic death of Mr Villers.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 1 · response
Published 11 June 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Discuss the case at the Radiology Events and Learning meeting.

    Stated by University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 June 2025.
  2. 2

    Deliver an educational session on aortic dissection.

    Stated by University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 June 2025.
  3. 3

    Establish outsourced subspecialist MRI reporting to provide additional capacity for scans not completed during scheduled reporting sessions.

    Stated by University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 11 June 2025.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    The subtle scan abnormality would have been difficult to identify regardless of reporting conditions, according to the radiologists who reviewed the case.

    Stated by University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  2. 2

    University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Service are expected to respond about the services involved.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss the case at the Radiology Events and Learning meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the reconfiguration we have undertaken, we have also discussed the case at our Radiology Events and Learning (REAL) meeting, which was held on 6 March 2025. We have also delivered an educational session around aortic dissection.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 11 June 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver an educational session on aortic dissection.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the reconfiguration we have undertaken, we have also discussed the case at our Radiology Events and Learning (REAL) meeting, which was held on 6 March 2025. We have also delivered an educational session around aortic dissection.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 11 June 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish outsourced subspecialist MRI reporting to provide additional capacity for scans not completed during scheduled reporting sessions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“c. Sub specialist MRI reporting is offered to other radiologists who are not on call as additional work to be carried out as a waiting list initiative (WLI) to cover their specialist areas.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 11 June 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The subtle scan abnormality would have been difficult to identify regardless of reporting conditions, according to the radiologists who reviewed the case.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the reconfiguration we have undertaken, we have also discussed the case at our Radiology Events and Learning (REAL) meeting, which was held on 6 March 2025. We have also delivered an educational session around aortic dissection.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 11 June 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Service are expected to respond about the services involved.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I note that you have also sent this report to University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, and Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Service and expect that they will respond regarding the concerns about the services involved.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 2 · response
Published 11 June 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026