PFD report

Ana Geanina SIRGHI-MARIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Sep 2016•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to promptly follow up microbiological results from unusually discoloured amniotic fluid
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon
  2. Failure to obtain immediate microbiological analysis of unusually discoloured amniotic fluid
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to obtain clinically indicated microbiological samples
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists is responsible for considering the recommendations in guideline revision and website guidance.

    Stated by British Maternal And Fetal Medicine SocietyRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to promptly follow up microbiological results from unusually discoloured amniotic fluid

Wider context from the report

“The amniotic fluid drawn off at amniocentesis two days before death was neither purulent nor blood stained, but was discoloured dark yellow. Given the rarity of such non blood stained discolouration, I heard evidence that it would be a wise precaution in this situation always to send a sample for immediate microbiological analysis, and quickly to follow up the result. I say always because, at the time of the amniocentesis, there was no fever or other indicator of infection, yet when Ms Sirghi-Marin presented at the emergency unit the following afternoon she was very unwell, and she died the next morning. Such action would not have changed the outcome in this instance, because presentation to the emergency unit took place approximately 26 hours after the amniocentesis. However, it might in another case. And given the rarity of such non blood stained discoloured amniotic fluid, a guideline that this action is necessary does not seem onerous. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to obtain immediate microbiological analysis of unusually discoloured amniotic fluid

Wider context from the report

“The amniotic fluid drawn off at amniocentesis two days before death was neither purulent nor blood stained, but was discoloured dark yellow. Given the rarity of such non blood stained discolouration, I heard evidence that it would be a wise precaution in this situation always to send a sample for immediate microbiological analysis, and quickly to follow up the result. I say always because, at the time of the amniocentesis, there was no fever or other indicator of infection, yet when Ms Sirghi-Marin presented at the emergency unit the following afternoon she was very unwell, and she died the next morning. Such action would not have changed the outcome in this instance, because presentation to the emergency unit took place approximately 26 hours after the amniocentesis. However, it might in another case. And given the rarity of such non blood stained discoloured amniotic fluid, a guideline that this action is necessary does not seem onerous. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to obtain clinically indicated microbiological samples.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists is responsible for considering the recommendations in guideline revision and website guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have discussed your recommendations with the joint chair of the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists’ Guidelines Committee.”

Source location

2017-0005-Response-by-Royal-College-of-Obstetricians-Gynaecologists
Page 1 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026