PFD report

Raees Osman Rauf · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Dec 2019•Derby and Derbyshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of required tutor meetings after examination failure
  2. Failure to monitor student engagement and identify struggling mathematics students early
  3. Lack of enforceable participation requirements for lectures, tutorials and homework
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of required tutor meetings after examination failure

Wider context from the report

“1. The University accepted during the course of the inquest that, due to the non-mandatory nature of tutorials and homework, within the School of Mathematics, it was difficult to assess whether a student was struggling until examination failures unless they specifically brought issues to the attention of the university themselves; 2. During the first year of the mathematics degree, students were not required to attend lectures or weekly tutorials, and weekly homework set was not mandatory. As a result of this there were no sanctions, or requirements to meet with form tutors or other tutors within the School of Mathematics at any point within the year; 3. There is no requirement to meet with a tutor at the school of mathematics after failure of an examination; 4. During the second year there was significantly less opportunity to have contact with the students. This was due to the fact that there were no weekly tutorials with personal tutors. There were lectures each week, for all School of Mathematics students however, attendance was not monitored and was not mandatory. Therefore, sometimes you only notice after exams if a student is really struggling; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to monitor student engagement and identify struggling mathematics students early

Wider context from the report

“1. The University accepted during the course of the inquest that, due to the non-mandatory nature of tutorials and homework, within the School of Mathematics, it was difficult to assess whether a student was struggling until examination failures unless they specifically brought issues to the attention of the university themselves; 2. During the first year of the mathematics degree, students were not required to attend lectures or weekly tutorials, and weekly homework set was not mandatory. As a result of this there were no sanctions, or requirements to meet with form tutors or other tutors within the School of Mathematics at any point within the year; 3. There is no requirement to meet with a tutor at the school of mathematics after failure of an examination; 4. During the second year there was significantly less opportunity to have contact with the students. This was due to the fact that there were no weekly tutorials with personal tutors. There were lectures each week, for all School of Mathematics students however, attendance was not monitored and was not mandatory. Therefore, sometimes you only notice after exams if a student is really struggling; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of enforceable participation requirements for lectures, tutorials and homework

Wider context from the report

“1. The University accepted during the course of the inquest that, due to the non-mandatory nature of tutorials and homework, within the School of Mathematics, it was difficult to assess whether a student was struggling until examination failures unless they specifically brought issues to the attention of the university themselves; 2. During the first year of the mathematics degree, students were not required to attend lectures or weekly tutorials, and weekly homework set was not mandatory. As a result of this there were no sanctions, or requirements to meet with form tutors or other tutors within the School of Mathematics at any point within the year; 3. There is no requirement to meet with a tutor at the school of mathematics after failure of an examination; 4. During the second year there was significantly less opportunity to have contact with the students. This was due to the fact that there were no weekly tutorials with personal tutors. There were lectures each week, for all School of Mathematics students however, attendance was not monitored and was not mandatory. Therefore, sometimes you only notice after exams if a student is really struggling; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.