PFD report

Andrew Crane · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 May 2018•Northamptonshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to pass updated patient condition information to the ambulance service
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of ambulance information systems to transfer safety-critical clinical and operational informationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of ambulance dispatch status and expectations
  2. Lack of clarity about discretion to initiate a Code Blue response to complaints of chest pain
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable operation of prison Code Blue emergency response
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to pass updated patient condition information to the ambulance service

Wider context from the report

“(2) A Code Blue was called when Mr Crane collapsed, and at this stage an ambulance was called. After this call, it became clear that Mr Crane was not breathing and CPR was commenced, but this further information was not passed to the ambulance service. This information would have changed the priority of the ambulance response. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of ambulance information systems to transfer safety-critical clinical and operational information; Unreliable communication of ambulance dispatch status and expectations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity about discretion to initiate a Code Blue response to complaints of chest pain

Wider context from the report

“(1) Mr Crane had complained of chest pain shortly before his cardiac arrest. The prison officer did not consider that he was unwell and so asked the healthcare nurse to attend. According to PSI 3/2013 and the prison’s emergency response policy, a complaint of chest pain should result in a Code Blue call. There was a lack of clarity amongst witnesses as to what, if any, discretion should be given in these circumstances to a prison officer who thinks that a complaint of chest pain does not require a Code Blue response. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable operation of prison Code Blue emergency response.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.