PFD report

James Ryan McLaren · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Oct 2018•Sunderland

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
4

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
13

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to ensure that locked bins can be opened from the inside
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety controls for people near waste-collection bins and vehicles
  2. Dark and unlit bin storage areas
  3. Quiet and isolated bin storage areas
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Create a single-page do’s and don’ts document promoting pre-collection checks and secure, well-lit bin storage.

    Stated by CIWMStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 March 2019.
  2. Action

    Encourage waste collection companies to share photographs of good and poor bin-storage practices to improve storage standards and restrict public access.

    Stated by CIWMStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 March 2019.
  3. Action

    Endorse WISH guidance as a means of managing risk, complying with the law and demonstrating industry-standard best practice.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 March 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    WASTE 25’s risk-based measures, including secure storage or suitable locks, are sufficient; a generic bin-lid lock is not required.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure that locked bins can be opened from the inside

Wider context from the report

“The WISH WASTE 25 – Managing access to large waste and recycling bins – contains formal guidance to prevent death or serious injury when people shelter in large commercial or communal domestic bins. This guidance was provided to the Inquest. Factors increasing the foreseeability of people gaining access and getting into the bins include, but are not limited to: ▪ the bin storage area: • being quiet and isolated; • being dark and unlit, especially at collection times; ▪ the bins: • having lids that are not secured and easy to open. I heard evidence that not all bins had lids, and that those, that did, had not been locked on 23rd December 2017. I heard that where there were locks to the bins and their lids, some had a generic lock that could be opened using a generic key, and that to unlock the bins would only take a matter of seconds, and that this would not be an onerous task for an operator to unlock the bin. I also heard that, although not in the location where James climbed into the bin, some customers fitted combination locks to bins with a code shared on a manifest for the collection vehicle. It is not known whether, once a bin is locked, it can be opened from the inside, and this is also a concern. This is particularly relevant with the nights becoming colder and darker, and the potential for people to seek refuge in bins due to the elements or for any other reason. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety controls for people near waste-collection bins and vehicles.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Dark and unlit bin storage areas

Wider context from the report

“The WISH WASTE 25 – Managing access to large waste and recycling bins – contains formal guidance to prevent death or serious injury when people shelter in large commercial or communal domestic bins. This guidance was provided to the Inquest. Factors increasing the foreseeability of people gaining access and getting into the bins include, but are not limited to: ▪ the bin storage area: • being quiet and isolated; • being dark and unlit, especially at collection times; ▪ the bins: • having lids that are not secured and easy to open. I heard evidence that not all bins had lids, and that those, that did, had not been locked on 23rd December 2017. I heard that where there were locks to the bins and their lids, some had a generic lock that could be opened using a generic key, and that to unlock the bins would only take a matter of seconds, and that this would not be an onerous task for an operator to unlock the bin. I also heard that, although not in the location where James climbed into the bin, some customers fitted combination locks to bins with a code shared on a manifest for the collection vehicle. It is not known whether, once a bin is locked, it can be opened from the inside, and this is also a concern. This is particularly relevant with the nights becoming colder and darker, and the potential for people to seek refuge in bins due to the elements or for any other reason. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Quiet and isolated bin storage areas

Wider context from the report

“The WISH WASTE 25 – Managing access to large waste and recycling bins – contains formal guidance to prevent death or serious injury when people shelter in large commercial or communal domestic bins. This guidance was provided to the Inquest. Factors increasing the foreseeability of people gaining access and getting into the bins include, but are not limited to: ▪ the bin storage area: • being quiet and isolated; • being dark and unlit, especially at collection times; ▪ the bins: • having lids that are not secured and easy to open. I heard evidence that not all bins had lids, and that those, that did, had not been locked on 23rd December 2017. I heard that where there were locks to the bins and their lids, some had a generic lock that could be opened using a generic key, and that to unlock the bins would only take a matter of seconds, and that this would not be an onerous task for an operator to unlock the bin. I also heard that, although not in the location where James climbed into the bin, some customers fitted combination locks to bins with a code shared on a manifest for the collection vehicle. It is not known whether, once a bin is locked, it can be opened from the inside, and this is also a concern. This is particularly relevant with the nights becoming colder and darker, and the potential for people to seek refuge in bins due to the elements or for any other reason. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to secure large commercial or communal domestic bins against entry

Wider context from the report

“The WISH WASTE 25 – Managing access to large waste and recycling bins – contains formal guidance to prevent death or serious injury when people shelter in large commercial or communal domestic bins. This guidance was provided to the Inquest. Factors increasing the foreseeability of people gaining access and getting into the bins include, but are not limited to: ▪ the bin storage area: • being quiet and isolated; • being dark and unlit, especially at collection times; ▪ the bins: • having lids that are not secured and easy to open. I heard evidence that not all bins had lids, and that those, that did, had not been locked on 23rd December 2017. I heard that where there were locks to the bins and their lids, some had a generic lock that could be opened using a generic key, and that to unlock the bins would only take a matter of seconds, and that this would not be an onerous task for an operator to unlock the bin. I also heard that, although not in the location where James climbed into the bin, some customers fitted combination locks to bins with a code shared on a manifest for the collection vehicle. It is not known whether, once a bin is locked, it can be opened from the inside, and this is also a concern. This is particularly relevant with the nights becoming colder and darker, and the potential for people to seek refuge in bins due to the elements or for any other reason. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create a single-page do’s and don’ts document promoting pre-collection checks and secure, well-lit bin storage.

Verbatim wording from the response

“- create a standard single page do’s and don’ts document to encourage waste companies to issue this to their customers to encourage them to follow WASTE25 guidance to ensure waste presented has been checked prior to collection and that the bin storage area is well maintained, has adequate lighting and that bins are locked over night”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-CIWM
Page 2 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Encourage waste collection companies to share photographs of good and poor bin-storage practices to improve storage standards and restrict public access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“- encourage waste collection companies to share photographs of good and bad practice of bin storage areas so that waste producers can improve standards of bin storage areas thereby making the bins inaccessible to public access”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-CIWM
Page 2 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Endorse WISH guidance as a means of managing risk, complying with the law and demonstrating industry-standard best practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Waste Industry Safety and Health Forum (WISH) is an industry led organisation that exists to communicate and consult with the waste and recycling industry to improve its health and safety performance. The guidance WISH produces, such as WASTE 25, Managing Access to Large Waste and Recycling Bins, is developed by the industry and HSE is consulted on the content. HSE are a member of, and advisor to, WISH but does not own the guidance that WISH produces. HSE does however endorse guidance produced by WISH as a means of managing risk, complying with the law and demonstrating best practice as industry standard.”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-HSE
Page 1 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Re-issue a safety alert to members in December 2018, including a link to WISH Waste 25 guidance on practical container checks before uplift.

Verbatim wording from the response

“With the onset of winter, we will re-issue a safety alert in December 2018 to our Members as per your request and include a link to WISH Waste 25, which contains guidance on practical checks that can be carried out by collection crews prior to uplift of containers.”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-ESA
Page 2 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

WASTE 25’s risk-based measures, including secure storage or suitable locks, are sufficient; a generic bin-lid lock is not required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“WASTE 25 then sets the reasonable precautions that businesses can take to prevent non-employees (with the exception of collection crews) from freely accessing any bins, i.e. to keep the bin “secure”. In this context security is taken to mean preventing a person physically getting into the bin. The guidance highlights factors that could increase the potential of persons accessing commercial bins and containers – such as leaving them in an open and/or unsecured area. Businesses should consider storing their bins within their building, within the curtilage of their premises, or in a dedicated secure area/enclosure. This in itself may be sufficient to prevent access and negates the needs for individual bins to be locked. Other deterrents such as locating bins in a well-lit area will have a role to play.”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Businesses using bins must assess access risks and decide which reasonably practicable prevention measures to adopt.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The guidance sets out circumstances that make it more likely that a person may try to gain access to bins taking account of location, the nature of materials collected in the bin, ease of access and so on. These are the factors that a business using such bins will need to take into account to decide what measures they need to adopt to restrict access. Where it is reasonably foreseeable that someone may access a bin the legal obligation on a user is to do what is reasonably practicable to prevent access.”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Waste contractors are responsible for deciding whether head torches or other controls are appropriate through site-specific risk assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The servicing of any waste collection contract requires an assessment of health and safety risks, which includes an assessment of risks at the point of waste collection. Lighting conditions, along with a host of other relevant factors, are considered as part of a waste contractor’s risk assessment process.”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-ESA
Page 2 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing risk assessments and proportionate alternative controls are considered sufficient; universal head-torch use is not endorsed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The servicing of any waste collection contract requires an assessment of health and safety risks, which includes an assessment of risks at the point of waste collection. Lighting conditions, along with a host of other relevant factors, are considered as part of a waste contractor’s risk assessment process.”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-ESA
Page 2 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.9

  1. 1

    Encourage waste companies to record incidents involving people sheltering in bins to support targeted future campaigns.

    Stated by CIWMStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 March 2019.
  2. 2

    Disseminate WASTE25 guidance and awareness messages encouraging bin checks before collection and warning against sleeping in large bins.

    Stated by CIWMStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 March 2019.
  3. 3

    Encourage waste companies to train collection crews to check large bins before emptying, with heightened vigilance in unlit storage areas.

    Stated by CIWMStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 March 2019.
  4. 4

    Restart the People in Bins Steering Group with additional member organisations to coordinate industry safety initiatives.

    Stated by CIWMStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 March 2019.
  5. 5

    Seek further opportunities to raise awareness of large-bin safety risks with councils.

    Stated by Local Government AssociationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 March 2019.
  6. 6

    Include warnings about death and injury risks from large bins in relevant LGA bulletins and council newsletters.

    Stated by Local Government AssociationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 March 2019.
  7. 7

    Participated in a cross-sector steering group to reduce harm caused by people in waste containers.

    Stated by Environmental Services Association Ltd.Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 March 2019.
  8. 8

    Contributed to developing WISH Waste 25 guidance on people in waste containers.

    Stated by Environmental Services Association Ltd.Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 March 2019.
  9. 9

    Disseminated safety messages about people in waste containers through national and trade press, a safety week and an alert to members.

    Stated by Environmental Services Association Ltd.Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 March 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Encourage waste companies to record incidents involving people sheltering in bins to support targeted future campaigns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“- encourage waste companies to record incidents of intercepting people sheltering in bins to enable data to be gathered on common locations; times of year; etc to enable a more detailed and targeted campaign in following years”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-CIWM
Page 2 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate WASTE25 guidance and awareness messages encouraging bin checks before collection and warning against sleeping in large bins.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Under the Health and Safety campaign 'This time it's personal' umbrella, CIWM are in the process of restarting the ‘People in Bins’ Steering Group with the original members and including LARAC and ROSPA; the objectives of the group will be to:”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-CIWM
Page 2 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Encourage waste companies to train collection crews to check large bins before emptying, with heightened vigilance in unlit storage areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“- encourage waste companies to ensure collection crews receive training to check large bins before they are emptied being particularly vigilant when large bins are stored in unlit areas”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-CIWM
Page 2 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Restart the People in Bins Steering Group with additional member organisations to coordinate industry safety initiatives.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In 2016 three waste management companies joined forces together with CIWM, ESA and HSE to pool resources to share information and create industry wide initiatives to save lives and formed the Steering Group ‘People in Bins’. The intention of the Steering Group was to include more organisation members over time and work with local authorities too. This remains the aim of the group, however there are difficulties in involving as many organisations as we would like.”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-CIWM
Page 2 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Seek further opportunities to raise awareness of large-bin safety risks with councils.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will seek further opportunities to raise awareness with councils. If any further material on this matter is published from the Coroner’s Office please let us know so that we can update our communications.”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-LGA
Page 1 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include warnings about death and injury risks from large bins in relevant LGA bulletins and council newsletters.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to your recommendation an item on the risk of death and injury in large bins will be included in relevant LGA bulletins and updates to councils. This includes the weekly email bulletins from the LGA’s Chairman and Chief Executive, and email newsletters on environment and regulatory issues. These will be circulated in January and February.”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-LGA
Page 1 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Participated in a cross-sector steering group to reduce harm caused by people in waste containers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• participated in a cross-sector steering group set up to reduce the risk of harm caused by people in containers;”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-ESA
Page 1 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Contributed to developing WISH Waste 25 guidance on people in waste containers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• contributed to the development of guidance, WISH Waste 25 (people in containers)”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-ESA
Page 1 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminated safety messages about people in waste containers through national and trade press, a safety week and an alert to members.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The risks posed by people in waste containers has been high on ESA’s health and safety agenda since about 2009 when this issue first emerged as a concern. Since then ESA has actively sought to raise the profile and dangers posed by people in containers to ensure that awareness, and control measures, are disseminated across the industry as widely as possible.”

Source location

2018-0330-Response-by-ESA
Page 1 · response
Published 1 March 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
4/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026