PFD report

Fatemeh Afrasiabi and 70 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Sep 2018•Inner West London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Lack of assessment of care needs and provision across supporting services
  2. Failure to coordinate and provide appropriate mental health support for people affected by the incident
  3. Lack of access to guidance and information about health consequences of hazardous-site exposure
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of assessment of care needs and provision across supporting services

Wider context from the report

“8. It may be that the provision of some care services, for physical or psychological damage may be provided by occupational health services outside the NHS, however a scale and risk assessment of need and care provision needs to be undertaken to minimise persons affected slipping through the net and being lost from appropriate supportive services. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to coordinate and provide appropriate mental health support for people affected by the incident

Wider context from the report

“7. That the NHS needs to oversee and co-ordinate and provide appropriate mental health support for all those affected by their involvement in the incident, be they survivors, bereaved, local residents or first responders or other workers involved in the aftermath. The potential impact of this disaster is very wide ranging. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of access to guidance and information about health consequences of hazardous-site exposure

Wider context from the report

“6. That survivors and first responders and site workers, need to be given access to guidance and/ or information that would help them to understand what could be the health consequences of being exposed to the hazardous environment of the site of the fire. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of structured health screening for people exposed to smoke and dust inhalation

Wider context from the report

“1. That no structured health screening programme is in place for those who were exposed to risks of smoke and dust inhalation during the Grenfell Tower fire. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Risk of respiratory illness after smoke, particulate and poison inhalation

Wider context from the report

“2. That those subject to smoke and dust inhalation are at risk of developing health conditions in particular respiratory illness after particulate and poison inhalation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Potential asbestos exposure causing late-onset health conditions

Wider context from the report

“3. That there may have been exposure to asbestos during and after the fire that could possibly cause late onset health issues such as mesothelioma. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Uncontrolled asbestos contamination creating exposure risks.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.