PFD report

Sangeerth GIRIRATHAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 May 2022•Milton Keynes

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of regulations governing van driver working hours
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable fatigue controls for prolonged safety-critical shifts
  2. Failure to keep monitoring alarms operational
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable patient-monitoring alarm systems
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency is responsible for enforcing the GB Drivers’ Hours rules.

    Stated by Department for TransportRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of regulations governing van driver working hours

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the inquest it became apparent that the deceased, who was employed as a delivery van driver, had been working for long hours prior to the original collision. It is likely that he may have fallen asleep and collided with the back of a stationary lorry on the M1 motorway. I am told that there are currently no regulations regarding the hours that can be worked by a van driver as opposed to the regulations that operate for heavy goods vehicles. I believe that this is a matter that should be reviewed by the department in order to prevent similar deaths in similar circumstances. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable fatigue controls for prolonged safety-critical shifts.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to keep monitoring alarms operational

Wider context from the report

“During the inquest it became apparent that the alarms that are operating on the monitors had been disengaged. This resulted in the staff not being alerted when the patient’s saturations fell below an acceptable level and he went into cardiac arrest. My understanding is that if a patient is being monitored at all then it is essential that the alarms remain operational. I believe that all staff should be reminded of the need for the alarms to be active so that future deaths in similar circumstances do not arise. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable patient-monitoring alarm systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency is responsible for enforcing the GB Drivers’ Hours rules.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) is responsible for the enforcement of the GB Drivers’ Hours rules and last year made 15,464 traffic checks on light goods vehicles and 67 different people were fined for Drivers’ Hours related offences.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 24 May 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    A definitive interpretation of the relevant legislation cannot be provided because its meaning and scope are ultimately matters for the courts.

    Stated by Department for TransportUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A definitive interpretation of the relevant legislation cannot be provided because its meaning and scope are ultimately matters for the courts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As I hope you will appreciate, I must point out that the Department is unable to give a definitive interpretation of the meaning and scope of any legislation as this is ultimately a matter for the courts to determine. We can, however, provide The Department's view.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 24 May 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026