PFD report

Tracy Gambrill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Oct 2023•South Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to measure the incision from the insular to the Temporal Horn at appropriate intra-operative times
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Disseminate the case précis and surgical safety advice to members performing amygdalohippocampectomy.

    Stated by The Society Of British Neurological SurgeonsStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 November 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Clinical procedure guidance falls outside the respondent’s role, which provides only high-level professional standards.

    Stated by General Medical CouncilOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to measure the incision from the insular to the Temporal Horn at appropriate intra-operative times

Wider context from the report

“[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] Each of the three surgical incisions were far too deep considering the average distance between the insular and the Temporal Horn. Only the second incision was measured intra operatively using a cannula and this was after the completion of the incision. From the evidence it is apparent that this operation is undertaken with surgeons relying on anatomical landmarks and head position to perform the procedure safely. The inquest did hear from an expert neurosurgical witness whose practice it was to measure the length of his incisions intra-operatively at appropriate times. This practice resulted in him having aborted an operation after failing to find the Temporal Horn within expected limits. Post-operatively he discovered that the patient’s head had moved from the correct position. I am concerned that it remains the position that it is not current and expected practice to measure the incision from the insular to the Temporal Horn at appropriate times during the operation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate the case précis and surgical safety advice to members performing amygdalohippocampectomy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On considering the coroner’s report, I consider that sharing a précis of the case, as presented to me, is appropriate so that points raised by the coroner can be considered by members performing amygdalohippocampectomy.”

Source location

Response from Society of British Neurological Surgeons
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Clinical procedure guidance falls outside the respondent’s role, which provides only high-level professional standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You raise the concern in your report that it is not current and expected practice for surgeons to measure the incision from the insula to the temporal horn at appropriate times during a transsylvian amygdalohippocampectomy. We do not provide guidance on clinical procedures, and other organisations who hold the expert clinical knowledge will be better placed to address your concern more directly, but I will explain where our standards and guidance will support actions taken to address your concern.”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Queries about specific procedure details should be directed to NICE, medical royal colleges, or specialty bodies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As the standards we set for medical education and practice don’t describe the details of specific procedures, we would refer queries on these to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE), medical royal colleges or specialty bodies. I note that The Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) has already responded to your concern with immediate action, writing to all SBNS members, asking them to recognise the importance of measuring depth intraoperatively, and empowering them to abort surgery when findings are not consistent with expectations.”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026