PFD report

Serena Nicolle · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Jun 2021•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Use of an unreliable chest/abdomen movement observation method for checking breathing through cell door hatches
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable assessment of whether a person is breathingPart of recurring concern: Unreliable prison cell-hatch observation of prisoners
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use of an unreliable chest/abdomen movement observation method for checking breathing through cell door hatches

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the inquest the court heard evidence that observing the movement of an individual’s chest and abdomen through a cell hatch is a standard procedure for checking whether they are breathing, in circumstances where they are not otherwise moving or responding to prison staff. The court heard that this is the position across the prison estate and is not limited to HMP Bronzefield. The court also heard evidence from expert witness Dr ████████, a Consultant Cardiologist, who stated that in his opinion it is very difficult to assess whether somebody is breathing or not by looking for movement in the chest/abdomen from a distance. The Coroner is concerned that on 3 September 2018 two members of prison staff assessed that Mrs Nicolle was breathing when she was in fact deceased, and that in doing so they followed standard procedures which are in place across the prison estate. Whilst these errors did not contribute to Mrs Nicolle’s death, the Coroner is concerned that were similar errors to occur in the future, it would present a risk of future deaths, particularly given Dr ████████ evidence that it is difficult to assess whether somebody is breathing or not by looking for movement in the chest/abdomen from a distance. 1. The observation of an individual’s chest/abdomen through a cell door hatch may be an unreliable method of checking whether they are breathing, in circumstances in which they are not otherwise moving or responding to prison staff, and therefore gives rise to the risk of future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable assessment of whether a person is breathing; Unreliable prison cell-hatch observation of prisoners.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.