PFD report

Emma Waring · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Sep 2015•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of automatic water suppression systems in residential properties
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate sprinkler protection in residential accommodation
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Install and maintain domestic sprinkler systems integrated with smoke alarms in properties occupied by vulnerable tenants.

    Stated by Rochdale Boroughwide Housing (RBHStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 September 2015.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of automatic water suppression systems in residential properties

Wider context from the report

“Immediate and positive consideration of the compulsory inclusion in the design, planning and building phases for residential properties (especially for those properties housing vulnerable individuals) of Automatic Water Suppression Systems more commonly known as ‘domestic sprinklers’ so as to provide further safeguards in the event of accidental or indeed deliberate fires in such premises. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate sprinkler protection in residential accommodation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install and maintain domestic sprinkler systems integrated with smoke alarms in properties occupied by vulnerable tenants.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, despite the lack of such legislation RBH has delivered domestic sprinklers in several properties occupied by some of our most vulnerable tenants. The decision to install domestic sprinklers was based on a number of factors not least of which was a desire to maintain their quality of life whilst at the same time offering them the very best protection from fire that we could. These installations were approved by Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service who were involved in the process from the outset and were installed by fully qualified sprinkler engineers. The sprinklers are connected to integrated smoke alarms which will only operate when a fire actually occurs and actuates a sprinkler head thereby significantly reducing the likelihood of false alarms.”

Source location

2015-0383-Response-by-RBH
Page 1 · response
Published 22 September 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Develop a project with Rochdale Council to support tenants identified as hoarders and provide RBH staff with a consistent toolkit-based approach.

    Stated by Rochdale Boroughwide Housing (RBHStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 22 September 2015.
  2. 2

    Continue seeking new and innovative ways to deliver statutory and additional fire-safety duties and improve tenant protection.

    Stated by Rochdale Boroughwide Housing (RBHStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 22 September 2015.
  3. 3

    Fit all properties with hard-wired smoke detection in line with current legislation.

    Stated by Rochdale Boroughwide Housing (RBHStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 September 2015.
  4. 4

    Provide targeted Safe and Well visits with Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service, act on recommendations, and record and securely share visit information.

    Stated by Rochdale Boroughwide Housing (RBHStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 September 2015.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Safe and Well visits are targeted at tenants most at risk because resource implications prevent offering them universally.

    Stated by Rochdale Boroughwide Housing (RBHUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a project with Rochdale Council to support tenants identified as hoarders and provide RBH staff with a consistent toolkit-based approach.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are also currently working with Rochdale Council’s Strategic Housing Service on a project designed to offer additional support to those identified as hoarders, an issue which has become more prevalent over recent years. The intention of the project is not only to ensure a consistent approach across all housing providers here in Rochdale but also to ensure that all RBH staff have the necessary support to deal with such issues as and when they are identified. The ‘toolkit’ is based on the internationally recognised ‘Clutter Image Rating Scale’ which is also used by several other partner agencies not only here in Rochdale but across Greater Manchester as a whole.”

Source location

2015-0383-Response-by-RBH
Page 2 · response
Published 22 September 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue seeking new and innovative ways to deliver statutory and additional fire-safety duties and improve tenant protection.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Regardless of all of the above, we will continue to seek new and innovative ways of delivering both our statutory fire safety duties and those which whilst not mandatory, we consider to be integral to our desire to be a housing provider of choice and to offer our tenants the best possible protection from fire. Although on occasion and despite our very best efforts tragic incidents such as that involving Miss Waring have the potential to occur, we are absolutely committed to continuous improvement and determined that any relevant lessons be learnt in our earnest attempts to ensure we do the very best that we can for all our tenants.”

Source location

2015-0383-Response-by-RBH
Page 2 · response
Published 22 September 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fit all properties with hard-wired smoke detection in line with current legislation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, all RBH properties are fitted with hard-wired smoke detection in line with current legislation.”

Source location

2015-0383-Response-by-RBH
Page 2 · response
Published 22 September 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide targeted Safe and Well visits with Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service, act on recommendations, and record and securely share visit information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although a number of our properties fall under the auspices of the F(SRRO)2005, the property in which Miss Waring was resident (and the vast majority of those we manage) was not covered by any enforceable fire safety legislation. We none the less take the issue of fire safety extremely seriously and, as such entered into a formal Service Level Agreement with Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service in August 2013 for the joint provision of Safe & Well visits to all our tenants.”

Source location

2015-0383-Response-by-RBH
Page 2 · response
Published 22 September 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Safe and Well visits are targeted at tenants most at risk because resource implications prevent offering them universally.

Verbatim wording from the response

“These visits are offered regardless of circumstance however, due to resource implications for both organisations they are presently targeted toward those considered to be most ‘at risk’ from fire due to their vulnerability in whatever regard that is evidenced. The visits are by self, RBH or partner agency referral and are undertaken by specific appointment chosen by the recipient themselves subsequent to which we jointly act upon any recommendations that are forthcoming including the potential onward referral to a number of partner agencies should additional support be identified.”

Source location

2015-0383-Response-by-RBH
Page 2 · response
Published 22 September 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026