PFD report

Catherine Mary GIBBON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Oct 2018•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
11

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised11

  1. Failure to train and guide reception staff in CCTV monitoring
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming poolsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable safety CCTV monitoring systems
  2. Inadequate CCTV screen visibility for pool activity
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide adequate supervision and emergency assistance coverage at recreational activity venuesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable safety CCTV monitoring systems
  3. Unavailability of continuous monitoring for swimmers with epilepsy
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to train and guide reception staff in CCTV monitoring

Wider context from the report

“3. The pool was not under continuous supervision and there was no legal requirement for a lifeguard, but it was under CCTV surveillance. The CCTV monitor was in reception. However, no training or guidance was given to the gym receptionist about what she should look for on the monitor and what she should do if all was not as she expected. Most especially, she was not given any instruction as to how frequently to check the monitor. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools; Unreliable safety CCTV monitoring systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate CCTV screen visibility for pool activity

Wider context from the report

“4. The receptionist also gave evidence that in her opinion, the screens (the monitor was split into four screens for the four cameras) were too small to see the pool activity clearly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide adequate supervision and emergency assistance coverage at recreational activity venues; Unreliable safety CCTV monitoring systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of continuous monitoring for swimmers with epilepsy

Wider context from the report

“2. There was also no clear understanding across staff of what additional help, if any, could be offered to a swimmer with epilepsy. Any understanding seemed to concentrate upon Ms Gibbon obtaining a doctor’s letter authorising swimming. Whilst there is of course merit in prompting a discussion with a potential swimmer’s doctor about the advisability of swimming, Fitness First indicated that constant monitoring of such a swimmer will not be offered. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain CCTV cameras and provide alternative surveillance when one is non-operational

Wider context from the report

“5. In fact, one of the four cameras had been broken since 24 May. It had not reported and no alternative measures had been taken since it had become non operational. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safety CCTV monitoring systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to share and act on learning from comparable pool deaths

Wider context from the report

“Fitness First have taken steps to address some of these issues, and told me that such learning is shared at a national level. However, at inquest Fitness First national lead for health and safety told me that he was unaware that I sent a prevention of future deaths report to Bannatyne’s on 13 August 2018, regarding a death in similar circumstances in Maida Vale on 10 October 2017. I did copy this report to Swim England, but this does not appear to have prompted a national conversation among private pool providers. I leave that now with UK Active. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to identify and address recurring safety issues through organisational learning; Failure to reliably disseminate contextualised safety learning to relevant staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of a defibrillator at poolside

Wider context from the report

“8. There was a defibrillator in the gym, but there was not another at poolside. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable availability and readiness of defibrillators for emergency response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prevent first aid certificate lapses through a failsafe renewal system

Wider context from the report

“9. Fitness First had made the decision that all first aid certificates would be renewed after one year rather than the usual three, but then the certificates were allowed to lapse because one person made an error and there was no failsafe system. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools; Inadequate staff competence to provide first aid; Unreliable on-site emergency medical and first-aid response arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear arrangements for additional help for swimmers with epilepsy

Wider context from the report

“2. There was also no clear understanding across staff of what additional help, if any, could be offered to a swimmer with epilepsy. Any understanding seemed to concentrate upon Ms Gibbon obtaining a doctor’s letter authorising swimming. Whilst there is of course merit in prompting a discussion with a potential swimmer’s doctor about the advisability of swimming, Fitness First indicated that constant monitoring of such a swimmer will not be offered. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of a building-wide audible emergency alarm

Wider context from the report

“6. There was no panic button that would activate an audible alarm throughout the building, so anyone pressing a button would not know if it had alerted others, and staff elsewhere (other than at reception) would be unaware that there was an emergency. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of emergency alarm response; Unreliable access to emergency communication.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear guidance and staff understanding of medical conditions relevant to exercise

Wider context from the report

“1. When Ms Gibbon joined the gym, she was given a health pledge to read. In this, she agreed to inform a member of staff if she had a medical condition that might interfere with exercise. However, she was not given any assistance in understanding which medical conditions would come in to this category. Even the staff taking her through the health pledge did not have a clear understanding of this. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable staff access to and understanding of safety-critical guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of immediate poolside telephone access for summoning medical assistance

Wider context from the report

“7. There was no landline at poolside that could be used to call an ambulance in case of emergency, to enable medical assistance to be summoned immediately by someone who actually had sight of the casualty. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide adequate supervision and emergency assistance coverage at recreational activity venues; Ineffective communication during medical emergencies; Unreliable access to emergency communication; Unreliable on-site emergency medical and first-aid response arrangements.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.