PFD report

Master Alex Malcolm · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Oct 2019•Inner South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Inadequate arrangements for responding to domestic violence
  2. Difficulties in recruitment and retention of probation officers
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient probation officer staffing capacity for safe casework
  3. Insufficient availability of Approved Premises places
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Introduce beneficial pay-on-promotion arrangements to support career progression and vacancy filling.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 November 2019.
  2. Action

    Pay market-forces allowances to probation staff in specified locations to address local recruitment and retention difficulties.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 November 2019.
  3. Action

    Continue monitoring recruitment and retention and assess implementation of the new pay structure.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 17 November 2019.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate arrangements for responding to domestic violence

Wider context from the report

“2. The Chair of the Serious Case Review subgroup of Lambeth Safeguarding Children Board said that strengthening any arrangements around domestic violence, including putting MARACs on a statutory basis had the potential to save lives. The senior Coroner raised this issue in a Prevention of Future Deaths Report to the Secretary of State for Health earlier this year, triggered by the chair of a domestic homicide review into the death of Donna Williamson. Her evidence was clear that there were arguments for MARAC and other bodies to be put on a statutory footing and for the system to be reviewed. The response from the ministry did not specifically address the issue. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Difficulties in recruitment and retention of probation officers

Wider context from the report

“3. A senior NPS divisional head said that there were still difficulties in recruitment and retention of probation officers, one factor in which was low pay. It is understood the matter is under review but details of what steps have since been taken and their adequacy were not heard by the coroner. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient probation officer staffing capacity for safe casework.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient availability of Approved Premises places

Wider context from the report

“1. A senior NPS divisional head said that providing more Approved Premises places would potentially save lives. It is understood the matter is under review but details of what steps have since been taken were not heard by the coroner. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce beneficial pay-on-promotion arrangements to support career progression and vacancy filling.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NPS Pay Modernisation included a two-year pensionable pay award (2018-19 and 2019-20) for all staff. Approximately 9,500 staff received a minimum pay award of 3 per cent in each year (instead of a contractual 1 per cent pay award if the pay reforms had not been implemented). The new pay structures also recognised staff at the maximum of their grade and provide a framework for pay progression for all staff through a competency-based framework. New arrangements, such as a more beneficial pay-on-promotion policy, were also introduced to support career progression and to assist the filling of vacancies on a temporary and permanent basis.”

Source location

2019-0344-Response-by-HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service
Page 1 · response
Published 17 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Pay market-forces allowances to probation staff in specified locations to address local recruitment and retention difficulties.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NPS staff based in London also receive a London Allowance of £3,889 per annum. In addition, a ‘Market Forces Allowance’ of £1,100 to £3,100 is currently being paid to”

Source location

2019-0344-Response-by-HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service
Page 1 · response
Published 17 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring recruitment and retention and assess implementation of the new pay structure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“HMPPS continues to monitor recruitment and retention, and to assess the implementation of the new pay structure. I hope that the measures I have described above demonstrate the continued work being done in this area.”

Source location

2019-0344-Response-by-HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 17 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce and operate modernised probation pay structures, including pensionable pay awards and competency-based progression.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You refer to difficulties in recruiting and retaining probation officers and the steps being taken to address these. HMPPS introduced a new pay structure with effect from 1 April 2018 for the National Probation Service (NPS) to recognise the professional nature of the work of its staff and the significant contribution they make. As part of this process, pay for the NPS was compared against other public sector employment, to ensure that it was competitive.”

Source location

2019-0344-Response-by-HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service
Page 1 · response
Published 17 November 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026