PFD report

Mrs Care · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Jun 2014•Cornwall

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to establish how patient trauma was sustained during hoist transfers
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to establish how patient trauma was sustained during hoist transfers

Wider context from the report

“At inquest I found as a matter of fact that it was more likely than not that trauma caused the extensive bruising seen on Mrs Care’s hip and abdomen at post-mortem. I further found that it was more likely than not that this trauma was sustained during Mrs Care’s stay in the Royal Cornwall Hospital. Evidence was read out at inquest that nothing untoward happened during the ambulance transfer. The bruising itself was discovered at the time of Mrs Care’s admission into Helston Community Hospital. I was not able to offer the family an explanation at inquest as to how this trauma had been sustained. That is plainly undesirable and it is for this reason that I write to bring this matter to your attention. You will understand that the pathologist found the extensive soft tissue haematoma was contributory to Mrs Care’s death, something the family described as “a sad state of affairs”. During the course of the inquest it was drawn to my attention that owing to the fact Mrs Care had become immobile she was being moved with a hoist. It was speculated that this may be the cause of the bruising that was seen. I had no evidence, however, from anyone who had been involved in moving Mrs Care by this means. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.