PFD report

Jonathan Edward Hawes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Nov 2015•Isle of Wight

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Road danger from driving at 60 mph on blind bends and cambers
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locationsPart of recurring concern: Uncontrolled collision risks at hazardous road bends
  2. Failure to exhibit appropriate road signage
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Attend the collision site with police and assess the highway layout, signs, road markings, and condition.

    Stated by Island Roads Services LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 November 2015.
  2. Action

    Monitor vehicle speeds to record current traffic speeds at the collision location.

    Stated by Island Roads Services LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 24 November 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    The Isle of Wight Council, as local highway authority, retains authority to implement reduced speed limits and install new road signs.

    Stated by Island Roads Services LimitedRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Road danger from driving at 60 mph on blind bends and cambers

Wider context from the report

“1. During the course of the evidence, it became clear that whilst this stretch of road is subject to the national speed limit of 60 mph, all of the witnesses who gave evidence and who traverse the road regularly suggested that it would be dangerous to attempt to drive that stretch of road where there are blind bends and cambers, at 60 mph. 2. I am concerned that a reconsideration of the speed limit on Cowleaze Hill should be undertaken. 3. I am concerned that there are a failure to exhibit appropriate road signage and ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locations; Uncontrolled collision risks at hazardous road bends.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to exhibit appropriate road signage

Wider context from the report

“1. During the course of the evidence, it became clear that whilst this stretch of road is subject to the national speed limit of 60 mph, all of the witnesses who gave evidence and who traverse the road regularly suggested that it would be dangerous to attempt to drive that stretch of road where there are blind bends and cambers, at 60 mph. 2. I am concerned that a reconsideration of the speed limit on Cowleaze Hill should be undertaken. 3. I am concerned that there are a failure to exhibit appropriate road signage and ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Attend the collision site with police and assess the highway layout, signs, road markings, and condition.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the fatal collision, representatives on Island Roads attended the site with the police. This visit considered in detail the highway layout, provision of road signs and road markings as well as the highway condition. It was considered at this time that no additional traffic calming or engineering measures were required at this location.”

Source location

2015-0466-Response
Page 4 · response
Published 24 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor vehicle speeds to record current traffic speeds at the collision location.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The 85th percentile speed of traffic is already well below 60mph and the collision record does not indicate a high frequency of collisions as a result of excessive speed. This suggests that the measures already in place provide adequate guidance for motorists to adopt an appropriate speed. However, further monitoring will be undertaken to record the current speed of vehicles.”

Source location

2015-0466-Response
Page 4 · response
Published 24 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Isle of Wight Council, as local highway authority, retains authority to implement reduced speed limits and install new road signs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would like to take this opportunity to make you aware that, although Ringway Island Roads manage and maintain the highway network on behalf of the Isle of Wight Council. The powers to implement reduced speed limits and install new road signs remain with the Isle of Wight Council, as they are the Local Highway Authority.”

Source location

2015-0466-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 24 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing signs and measures were considered adequate because speeds were below 60 mph and the collision record did not indicate frequent speed-related collisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Warning signs should not be used to highlight features that a driver would routinely expect to encounter along a road. Each of the bends where a driver might find it difficult to negotiate without slowing down is clearly signed with signs to diagram 515.”

Source location

2015-0466-Response
Page 4 · response
Published 24 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Additional signs or a reduced speed limit were considered unlikely to measurably affect collision rates, so limited resources should not be allocated to them.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Based on the information available for this road, the provision of additional signs and/or the reduction in the speed limit is unlikely to have a measurable impact on the collision rate on this road. It is therefore recommended that the Isle of Wight Council do not allocate their limited resources to such measures.”

Source location

2015-0466-Response
Page 4 · response
Published 24 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No additional traffic-calming or engineering measures were considered necessary at the collision location.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the fatal collision, representatives on Island Roads attended the site with the police. This visit considered in detail the highway layout, provision of road signs and road markings as well as the highway condition. It was considered at this time that no additional traffic calming or engineering measures were required at this location.”

Source location

2015-0466-Response
Page 4 · response
Published 24 November 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026