PFD report

Andrew Thomas MCCLEARY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Nov 2025•Bedfordshire and Luton

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of awareness and training regarding the risks and effects of force and restraint
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe police restraint practices and controls
  2. Failure to undertake collaborative planning with attending ambulance staff before using force or restraint
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe police restraint practices and controls
  3. Lack of knowledge and/or concern regarding Mental Capacity Act requirements for using force and restraint
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably apply Mental Capacity Act principles in care decisionsPart of recurring concern: Unsafe police restraint practices and controls
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Develop and launch joint police–ambulance scenario training for multi-agency incidents involving vulnerable patients.

    Stated by Bedfordshire PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2025.
  2. Action

    Provide mandatory Personal Safety Training incorporating the Acute Behavioural Disturbance programme and guidance on recognition, restraint risks, monitoring and multi-agency working.

    Stated by Bedfordshire PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2025.
  3. Action

    Establish a joint Bedfordshire Police–EEAST memorandum of understanding defining roles for suspected Acute Behavioural Disturbance and access to rapid tranquilisation, pending EEAST sign-off.

    Stated by Bedfordshire PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 December 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Police officers may defer to attending health professionals’ capacity assessments and rely on their advice when applying force.

    Stated by Bedfordshire PoliceExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of awareness and training regarding the risks and effects of force and restraint

Wider context from the report

“1) There was an evident lack of knowledge and/or concern on the part of the attending officers of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005, particularly when it came to the decision to use force against and restrain Andrew. 2) There was an evident lack of awareness on the part of the attending officers of the risks/effects of using force against and restraining Andrew and of the need for collaborative planning with attending ambulance staff before doing so. 3) There was an evident lack of attention to and/or concern for Andrew on the part of the attending officers both during and after the restraint. The above matters were of particular concern in view of the previous Regulation 28 Report made on 21 October 2021, following the Inquest into the death of Leon Briggs in 2013, which highlighted a lack of training regarding the effects of restraint as well as inadequate monitoring of a detainee subject to restraint on the part of Bedfordshire Police Officers. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe police restraint practices and controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to undertake collaborative planning with attending ambulance staff before using force or restraint

Wider context from the report

“1) There was an evident lack of knowledge and/or concern on the part of the attending officers of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005, particularly when it came to the decision to use force against and restrain Andrew. 2) There was an evident lack of awareness on the part of the attending officers of the risks/effects of using force against and restraining Andrew and of the need for collaborative planning with attending ambulance staff before doing so. 3) There was an evident lack of attention to and/or concern for Andrew on the part of the attending officers both during and after the restraint. The above matters were of particular concern in view of the previous Regulation 28 Report made on 21 October 2021, following the Inquest into the death of Leon Briggs in 2013, which highlighted a lack of training regarding the effects of restraint as well as inadequate monitoring of a detainee subject to restraint on the part of Bedfordshire Police Officers. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe police restraint practices and controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of knowledge and/or concern regarding Mental Capacity Act requirements for using force and restraint

Wider context from the report

“1) There was an evident lack of knowledge and/or concern on the part of the attending officers of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005, particularly when it came to the decision to use force against and restrain Andrew. 2) There was an evident lack of awareness on the part of the attending officers of the risks/effects of using force against and restraining Andrew and of the need for collaborative planning with attending ambulance staff before doing so. 3) There was an evident lack of attention to and/or concern for Andrew on the part of the attending officers both during and after the restraint. The above matters were of particular concern in view of the previous Regulation 28 Report made on 21 October 2021, following the Inquest into the death of Leon Briggs in 2013, which highlighted a lack of training regarding the effects of restraint as well as inadequate monitoring of a detainee subject to restraint on the part of Bedfordshire Police Officers. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably apply Mental Capacity Act principles in care decisions; Unsafe police restraint practices and controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide adequate attention and monitoring during and after restraint

Wider context from the report

“1) There was an evident lack of knowledge and/or concern on the part of the attending officers of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005, particularly when it came to the decision to use force against and restrain Andrew. 2) There was an evident lack of awareness on the part of the attending officers of the risks/effects of using force against and restraining Andrew and of the need for collaborative planning with attending ambulance staff before doing so. 3) There was an evident lack of attention to and/or concern for Andrew on the part of the attending officers both during and after the restraint. The above matters were of particular concern in view of the previous Regulation 28 Report made on 21 October 2021, following the Inquest into the death of Leon Briggs in 2013, which highlighted a lack of training regarding the effects of restraint as well as inadequate monitoring of a detainee subject to restraint on the part of Bedfordshire Police Officers. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe police restraint practices and controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and launch joint police–ambulance scenario training for multi-agency incidents involving vulnerable patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have strengthened collaborative working with EEAST through the development and launch of joint scenario training which focusses on the ways in which Police and Ambulance personnel work together during multi-agency incidents, such as in the case of Mr McCleary. This improves communication, understanding of roles and responsibilities and importantly, maintains focus on the wellbeing of the patient.”

Source location

Response from Bedfordshire Police
Page 4 · response
Published 2 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide mandatory Personal Safety Training incorporating the Acute Behavioural Disturbance programme and guidance on recognition, restraint risks, monitoring and multi-agency working.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the death of Mr McCleary we have reviewed our use of force policies, processes and training. All Police Officers receive mandatory Personal Safety Training (“PST”) which includes a specific element on dealing with individuals suspected of being impaired by Acute Behavioural Disturbance (“ABD”).”

Source location

Response from Bedfordshire Police
Page 3 · response
Published 2 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a joint Bedfordshire Police–EEAST memorandum of understanding defining roles for suspected Acute Behavioural Disturbance and access to rapid tranquilisation, pending EEAST sign-off.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, Bedfordshire Police and EEAST have developed a Memorandum Of Understanding (“MOU”) to reinforce clear roles and responsibilities of both partner agencies in managing the needs of patients with suspected ABD and increasing the access to rapid tranquilisation at scene via appropriately trained paramedics. This MOU is awaiting imminent sign-off from EEAST Clinical Best Practice Group (already signed off by Bedfordshire Police). The MOU has been created in compliance with the CoP and Royal College of Emergency Medicine guidance.”

Source location

Response from Bedfordshire Police
Page 4 · response
Published 2 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver mandatory Mental Capacity Act training to all frontline police officers, including capacity assessment, lawful restraint and recording requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that all frontline Police Officers receive mandatory MCA training which includes, the statutory principles of the MCA (presumption of capacity, enabling decision-making, respect for unwise decisions, acting in best interests, and least restrictive option), capacity assessments, emergency interventions under Sections 5 and 6 MCA (including lawful authority for proportionate restraint), and the requirement to record decisions and rationale. Our MCA training is reinforced through scenario-based exercises and reference to case law, including R (Sessay) v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust.”

Source location

Response from Bedfordshire Police
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review use-of-force policies, processes and training following the death.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the death of Mr McCleary we have reviewed our use of force policies, processes and training. All Police Officers receive mandatory Personal Safety Training (“PST”) which includes a specific element on dealing with individuals suspected of being impaired by Acute Behavioural Disturbance (“ABD”).”

Source location

Response from Bedfordshire Police
Page 3 · response
Published 2 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Police officers may defer to attending health professionals’ capacity assessments and rely on their advice when applying force.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, Police Officers are trained to defer to health professionals when making decisions regarding a person’s capacity status, with an assumption that the health professional has better training and experience than a Police Officer. Indeed, College of Policing national guidance states, “In situations where health or social care professionals are on the scene, police should defer to their expertise and provide support as appropriate and in accordance with local protocols”.”

Source location

Response from Bedfordshire Police
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

For health-related incidents, the agency with the appropriate skills and legal responsibility should lead rather than police.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We acknowledge your reference to Mr Briggs’ PFD dated 21 October 2021 but note this post-dated Mr McCleary’s death. However, Bedfordshire Police and partners have worked together since 2024 to introduce and embed the national programme of Right Care, Right Person (RCRP). This is of particular relevance as the core principles are that Police should only respond where there is a clear policing purpose and the agency with the right skills and legal responsibility should lead.”

Source location

Response from Bedfordshire Police
Page 4 · response
Published 2 December 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Introduce and embed the national Right Care, Right Person programme with partner agencies.

    Stated by Bedfordshire PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2025.
  2. 2

    Continue working closely with health partners so people requiring medical care receive it from appropriate professionals.

    Stated by Bedfordshire PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 December 2025.
  3. 3

    Engage the College of Policing to consider implications of the case for current national police guidance.

    Stated by Bedfordshire PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 December 2025.
  4. 4

    Review all Acute Behavioural Disturbance incidents jointly with EEAST.

    Stated by Bedfordshire PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce and embed the national Right Care, Right Person programme with partner agencies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We acknowledge your reference to Mr Briggs’ PFD dated 21 October 2021 but note this post-dated Mr McCleary’s death. However, Bedfordshire Police and partners have worked together since 2024 to introduce and embed the national programme of Right Care, Right Person (RCRP). This is of particular relevance as the core principles are that Police should only respond where there is a clear policing purpose and the agency with the right skills and legal responsibility should lead.”

Source location

Response from Bedfordshire Police
Page 4 · response
Published 2 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working closely with health partners so people requiring medical care receive it from appropriate professionals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In conclusion, Bedfordshire Police remain fully committed to learning from the tragic circumstances of Mr McCleary’s death and to ensuring that our policies, training and operational practice continue to develop in line with national guidance, legislation and best practice. We recognise the vital importance of effective multi-agency working in responding to vulnerable individuals, and we will continue to work closely with our health partners to ensure that those in medical need receive the right care from the right professionals. I trust that the actions outlined above provide assurance of our commitment to safeguarding the public.”

Source location

Response from Bedfordshire Police
Page 5 · response
Published 2 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage the College of Policing to consider implications of the case for current national police guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A specific issue raised as a result of this Inquest is that a Police Officer cannot rely on the capacity assessment of a health professional and must satisfy themselves of capacity status, before they are able to lawfully apply force. We have therefore shared the circumstances of this case with the College of Policing and are currently engaging with them to consider what bearing this may have on current national police guidance.”

Source location

Response from Bedfordshire Police
Page 3 · response
Published 2 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review all Acute Behavioural Disturbance incidents jointly with EEAST.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All ABD incidents are reviewed jointly by Bedfordshire Police and EEAST. Recent reviews of Body Worn Video from two ABD incidents demonstrated Police Officers and Paramedics working collaboratively and applying MCA legislation to provide lifesaving care to each patient.”

Source location

Response from Bedfordshire Police
Page 4 · response
Published 2 December 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026