PFD report

Adam RICE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Mar 2016•West Yorkshire Eastern

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to maintain a trained and experienced reserve of custody staff for rapid deployment
  2. Failure to communicate outstanding investigations or treatment to police after a patient self-discharges
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services
  3. Failure to recruit suitably capable custody staff
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure custody staff are suitable and competent to work with vulnerable people
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Maintain a trained, deployable bank of ad hoc custody staff, aligned to permanent staff shifts and monitored quarterly for sufficient capacity.

    Stated by West Yorkshire PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 March 2016.
  2. Action

    Provide comprehensive PACE and APP training before custody work and annual refresher training for custody staff.

    Stated by West Yorkshire PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 March 2016.
  3. Action

    Recruit five additional Detention Officers for Leeds custody suite to increase capacity and reduce reliance on ad hoc gaolers.

    Stated by West Yorkshire PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 March 2016.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Existing arrangements provide relevant medical-information handovers when patients transfer to recognised facilities with trained medical or nursing staff.

    Stated by Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain a trained and experienced reserve of custody staff for rapid deployment

Wider context from the report

“3b To ensure that they have a bank of staff who might ordinarily be engaged in other duties but who are trained and have experience in Custody work who can be drafted in at short notice during such periods of high demand when it becomes obvious that the existing staff cannot cope with the demands being placed upon them. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate outstanding investigations or treatment to police after a patient self-discharges

Wider context from the report

“1. When a patient self-discharges against medical advice and it is known or it is highly likely that the Police will immediately thereafter become involved and it can be foreseen that the patient will be taken into Custody. 2. Then the Clinician(s) involved should inform the Police that the person has self-discharged against advice and should give brief details of any desired and outstanding investigations or treatment (eg. Reference to a possible head injury would suffice and the desire to carry out a CT head scan). This I suggest would not breach patient confidentiality. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recruit suitably capable custody staff

Wider context from the report

“2. That West Yorkshire Police only recruit Custody staff of the highest calibre to carry out this vital role involving some of the most vulnerable members of society. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure custody staff are suitable and competent to work with vulnerable people.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate custody staffing levels during periods of high demand

Wider context from the report

“3a To ensure that there are adequate staffing levels of all ranks and grades to fulfil this vital role particularly during periods of high demand when it is known that Custody facilities will be extremely busy and in particular on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of comprehensive knowledge of custody law and procedures among custody staff

Wider context from the report

“1. To ensure that Custody staff to which I mean Police Officers of all ranks, Civilian Detention Officers and Nursing staff have a full and comprehensive knowledge of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act and the relevant Codes of Practice and the relevant provisions of the College of Policing Authorised Professional Practice Provisions in respect of Detention and Custody and Custody Management Planning. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure custody staff understand and apply detention procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain a trained, deployable bank of ad hoc custody staff, aligned to permanent staff shifts and monitored quarterly for sufficient capacity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“West Yorkshire Police have staff who work permanently in our custody suites, but also have a bank of ‘ad hoc’ staff who are fully trained. ‘Ad hoc’ staff are used to cover periods of abstraction of the permanent staff (such as annual leave) or when demand is such that additional resources are required during a busy shift. These ‘ad hoc’ staff receive exactly the same level of training as permanent staff, including the annual refresher training. Whilst this is a very costly training requirement for staff that will only be used on an ‘ad-hoc’ basis, it is absolutely necessary to have all staff who may work in a custody suite, trained to the highest standards.”

Source location

Adam-Rice-Response_Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 3 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide comprehensive PACE and APP training before custody work and annual refresher training for custody staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All Custody Staff employed by West Yorkshire Police undergo a full training programme in line with the College of Policing requirements prior to working in a live custody suite. During this initial course, Custody Officers, Detention Officers and PC Gaolers all receive training on the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (Code C) and Authorised Professional Practice (APP).”

Source location

Adam-Rice-Response_Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 3 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recruit five additional Detention Officers for Leeds custody suite to increase capacity and reduce reliance on ad hoc gaolers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“West Yorkshire Police currently has 7 Inspectors, 55 Custody Sergeants and 147 detention Officers working across the five custody suites. A new Police shift pattern was introduced in February 2016 which contains periods of overlap across the busy times and the shift templates have been adjusted to meet the needs of each district. ACC ████████ has also reviewed the staffing levels at the five custody suites in February 2016, the result being that an extra five Detention Officers (one per shift) are being recruited to work at Leeds. This will result in reducing the need to bring in ‘ad-hoc’ PC gaolers at the detention Officers meal times.”

Source location

Adam-Rice-Response_Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 3 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a revised police shift pattern with overlap during busy periods and district-adjusted shift templates.

Verbatim wording from the response

“West Yorkshire Police currently has 7 Inspectors, 55 Custody Sergeants and 147 detention Officers working across the five custody suites. A new Police shift pattern was introduced in February 2016 which contains periods of overlap across the busy times and the shift templates have been adjusted to meet the needs of each district. ACC ████████ has also reviewed the staffing levels at the five custody suites in February 2016, the result being that an extra five Detention Officers (one per shift) are being recruited to work at Leeds. This will result in reducing the need to bring in ‘ad-hoc’ PC gaolers at the detention Officers meal times.”

Source location

Adam-Rice-Response_Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 3 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop proposals to involve Custody Services in selecting future Detention Officers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Detention Officers are non-warranted and do not conduct any other roles, if they are employed as Detention Officers. The application process currently entails an application form and interview by our Human Resources (HR) Team. We are currently progressing and developing proposals to involve Custody Services (led by Inspectors ████████) to have involvement in the selection of future Detention Officers, which will further ensure suitability for role at time of selection.”

Source location

Adam-Rice-Response_Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 3 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing arrangements provide relevant medical-information handovers when patients transfer to recognised facilities with trained medical or nursing staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“iii) Our Emergency Department staff would like to reassure you that there are already arrangements in place for a handover of relevant medical information when patients are discharged from the Emergency Department. When a patient leaves the department for their own home, their GP will receive a discharge summary and the patient will normally be given advice in the presence of their next of kin as to features which warrant re-attendance. Similarly, when a patient is transferred to another hospital, relevant details will accompany the patient to the new healthcare provider and a formal handover of care will take place. The same principle applies where a patient is being transferred to a facility, such as a Police Custody Suite that is recognised to have trained medical or nursing staff.”

Source location

Adam-Rice-Response_Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 3 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Routine police contact after self-discharge is considered infeasible, unreasonable, time-consuming and likely to breach confidentiality unjustifiably.

Verbatim wording from the response

“iv) The reality of a current day Emergency Department is that many patients take their own discharge every week. Many such patients will be known to the Police. We do not believe it feasible or reasonable to expect a healthcare practitioner to make a judgement as to whether that patient is likely to be arrested soon after discharge against medical advice. We believe that routinely contacting the Police in these circumstances would take a significant amount of”

Source location

Adam-Rice-Response_Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 3 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Clinicians could not identify a lawful public-interest justification to disclose medical information to police without the patient’s consent.

Verbatim wording from the response

“i) The General Medical Council set out in their 2009 guidance (“Confidentiality”) at Paragraph 36 the circumstances where a disclosure without patient consent can be made in the public interest. Essentially this is confined to a situation where there is a need to protect individuals from serious harm, such as serious communicable diseases or serious crime. As you know, the GMC takes the view that there is a clear public good from having a confidential medical service and quite rightly doctors who break patient confidentiality put themselves at risk of serious censure. After extensive multi-disciplinary discussion on this matter, we have been unable to identify either an indication for disclosing information about Mr Rice’s medical assessment or a justification in this case for such disclosure without the necessary permissions.”

Source location

Adam-Rice-Response_Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 3 March 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Share the Regulation 28 report with relevant clinical staff and the risk management team.

    Stated by Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 March 2016.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The death was sudden and unexpected, could not have been predicted during assessment, and was not contributed to by subsequent detention.

    Stated by Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the Regulation 28 report with relevant clinical staff and the risk management team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that the contents of your Regulation 28 Report have been shared with the relevant clinical staff and our risk management team to enable us to provide you with a comprehensive response.”

Source location

Adam-Rice-Response_Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 3 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The death was sudden and unexpected, could not have been predicted during assessment, and was not contributed to by subsequent detention.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can reassure you that all the staff involved in Mr Rice’s care were saddened to learn of his untimely death. However, they are confident following reflection that they acted appropriately and professionally at all times, despite the challenges presented by such patients, with nothing to suggest any discrimination or shortfalls in anticipated care standards. Sadly it would seem Mr Rice suffered a sudden and unexpected death that could not have been predicted during his assessment at Leeds General Infirmary and was seemingly not in any way contributed to by his subsequent detention at Elland Road Custody Suite.”

Source location

Adam-Rice-Response_Redacted
Page 7 · response
Published 3 March 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026