PFD report

Philip Noel Sheridan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Jan 2021•West Yorkshire Eastern

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Potential fire hazards in properties managed by the same property managers, including inadequate smoke detection equipment or emergency escape routes
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe emergency egress arrangements
  2. Failure to ascertain housing safety and regulatory approval before awarding Local Housing Allowance
  3. Lack of periodic checking and replacement of smoke detection devices
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Analyse responses to the smoke and carbon-monoxide alarm regulations consultation.

    Stated by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local GovernmentStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 January 2021.
  2. Action

    Examine ways to support increased planning-enforcement activity.

    Stated by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local GovernmentStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 January 2021.
  3. Action

    Publish the Government response to the smoke and carbon-monoxide alarm regulations consultation.

    Stated by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local GovernmentStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 January 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Day-to-day responsibility for planning control rests with local planning authorities, rather than central government.

    Stated by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local GovernmentRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Potential fire hazards in properties managed by the same property managers, including inadequate smoke detection equipment or emergency escape routes

Wider context from the report

“1) ████████ entered an Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement with the deceased on 14th August 2013. He was a person in control of the cellar flat within the meaning defined in the Housing Act 2004. He and/or ████████ were involved in the management of other properties in the Leeds area in the period 2013-2019. He or they should have been aware that the cellar flat did not have planning consent, Building Regulation Approval and had not been inspected by Leeds City Council Housing Officers. The evidence taken at the Inquest gave rise to a concern on the balance of probability that the hazards identified in the cellar flat may be replicated in other properties managed by them, particularly in relation to the provision of smoke detection equipment or emergency escape routes in the event of fire. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe emergency egress arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ascertain housing safety and regulatory approval before awarding Local Housing Allowance

Wider context from the report

“2) Leeds City Council made payments relating to Local Housing Allowance direct to ████████ totalling £9462.05 in respect of the cellar flat which had taken the address of ████████ Leeds. This was done without ascertaining whether the cellar flat had planning consent, Building Regulation Approval or had been inspected by Leeds City Council Housing Officers to establish whether it was safe for human habitation. Evidence taken at the Inquest indicated there were many other comparable properties in Leeds. This situation gives rise to a concern that fire hazards may be present in respect of properties which may have the appearance of being approved by virtue of the award of Local Housing Allowance. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of periodic checking and replacement of smoke detection devices

Wider context from the report

“3) Evidence taken at the Inquest indicated that whilst a Landlord has an obligation to provide smoke detection devices at the inception of a tenancy, there was no ongoing duty to ensure they continued to be effective or replace them if found to be faulty. In this case the tenant had resided in a cellar flat for nearly six years, before he sustained injuries in a fire which proved fatal. There was no smoke alarm in the cellar flat at the time of the fire on 26th June 2019. I am concerned that the laudable statutory objective enshrined in The Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Alarm (England) Regulations 2015 is undermined if a landlord is not required to check periodically such devices are still effective. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Analyse responses to the smoke and carbon-monoxide alarm regulations consultation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are also proposing to amend the legislation to create an obligation for social and private landlords to repair or replace smoke alarms, once informed that they are faulty. We are not proposing to require landlords to test smoke alarms throughout the life of a tenancy. The consultation ran for 8 weeks from 17 November 2020 and closed on 11 January 2021. We are currently analysing the responses and will publish our response in due course.”

Source location

2021-0016-Response-from-Ministry-of-Housing-Communities-Local-Government-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 January 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Examine ways to support increased planning-enforcement activity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of our reform of the planning system, we are keen to see a stronger emphasis on planning enforcement. Our recent ‘Planning for the Future’ White Paper sets out our intention to introduce stronger enforcement powers and to look at ways of supporting more enforcement activity.”

Source location

2021-0016-Response-from-Ministry-of-Housing-Communities-Local-Government-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 January 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish the Government response to the smoke and carbon-monoxide alarm regulations consultation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are also proposing to amend the legislation to create an obligation for social and private landlords to repair or replace smoke alarms, once informed that they are faulty. We are not proposing to require landlords to test smoke alarms throughout the life of a tenancy. The consultation ran for 8 weeks from 17 November 2020 and closed on 11 January 2021. We are currently analysing the responses and will publish our response in due course.”

Source location

2021-0016-Response-from-Ministry-of-Housing-Communities-Local-Government-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 January 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce stronger planning-enforcement powers through planning-system reform.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of our reform of the planning system, we are keen to see a stronger emphasis on planning enforcement. Our recent ‘Planning for the Future’ White Paper sets out our intention to introduce stronger enforcement powers and to look at ways of supporting more enforcement activity.”

Source location

2021-0016-Response-from-Ministry-of-Housing-Communities-Local-Government-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 January 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fund production of planning-enforcement guidance for local authorities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Day to day responsibility for planning control rests with local planning authorities. We have recently funded the National Association of Planning Enforcement (NAPE) to produce guidance to help authorities carry out their enforcement functions. This guidance sets out the wide range of powers available and provides advice about their use in practice. In particular, local authorities have various powers to request information about the ownership and use of land. NAPE’s guidance contains examples of sources of information that authorities may draw upon, including things such as housing and council tax records.”

Source location

2021-0016-Response-from-Ministry-of-Housing-Communities-Local-Government-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 January 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult on extending smoke and carbon-monoxide alarm requirements to social housing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are currently consulting on proposals to extend the Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Alarm (England) Regulations 2015. We are proposing to mandate smoke alarms in all socially rented homes. Social landlords would be obliged to provide a smoke alarm on each storey of the premises on which there is a room used wholly or partly as living accommodation. This would bring requirements in line with those for private landlords.”

Source location

2021-0016-Response-from-Ministry-of-Housing-Communities-Local-Government-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 January 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Day-to-day responsibility for planning control rests with local planning authorities, rather than central government.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Day to day responsibility for planning control rests with local planning authorities. We have recently funded the National Association of Planning Enforcement (NAPE) to produce guidance to help authorities carry out their enforcement functions. This guidance sets out the wide range of powers available and provides advice about their use in practice. In particular, local authorities have various powers to request information about the ownership and use of land. NAPE’s guidance contains examples of sources of information that authorities may draw upon, including things such as housing and council tax records.”

Source location

2021-0016-Response-from-Ministry-of-Housing-Communities-Local-Government-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 January 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026