PFD report

Arsalan Khalid BAIG · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Mar 2025•West Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of adequate street lighting
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lightingPart of recurring concern: Inadequate outdoor safety lighting
  2. Lack of appropriate traffic warning signs for the approaching wall and road turn
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Install a new street-lighting column at the Dryden Street and Buck Street corner facing approaching traffic.

    Stated by Bradford City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 March 2025.
  2. Action

    Install a TSRGD 515.1 chevron sign on the new lighting column to highlight the road’s 90-degree alignment.

    Stated by Bradford City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 March 2025.
  3. Action

    Install a TSRGD 512 “Left Bend Ahead” warning sign on the left-hand side of Dryden Street.

    Stated by Bradford City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 March 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Extreme speeding and intoxication make it uncertain that additional measures would have materially altered the collision outcome.

    Stated by Bradford City CouncilDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of adequate street lighting

Wider context from the report

“The deceased was a passenger in a motor vehicle driven by Mohammed Azad Baig upon the late evening of 30th July 2022. The car containing both Mr Khan and Mr Baig was travelling along Dryden Street Bradford towards a right hand turn into Buck Street , whilst also approaching a brick wall at the end of Dryden Street. The street was badly lit with no traffic warning signs provided to the driver or his passenger as to the approaching wall and a 90 degree turn of the road onto Buck Street. It is my concern that it is more likely than not that the absence of good street lighting and lack of appropriate traffic warning signs contributed in part to the death of the deceased. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lighting; Inadequate outdoor safety lighting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of appropriate traffic warning signs for the approaching wall and road turn

Wider context from the report

“The deceased was a passenger in a motor vehicle driven by Mohammed Azad Baig upon the late evening of 30th July 2022. The car containing both Mr Khan and Mr Baig was travelling along Dryden Street Bradford towards a right hand turn into Buck Street , whilst also approaching a brick wall at the end of Dryden Street. The street was badly lit with no traffic warning signs provided to the driver or his passenger as to the approaching wall and a 90 degree turn of the road onto Buck Street. It is my concern that it is more likely than not that the absence of good street lighting and lack of appropriate traffic warning signs contributed in part to the death of the deceased. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install a new street-lighting column at the Dryden Street and Buck Street corner facing approaching traffic.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that following the incident:”

Source location

Response from Bradford Council
Page 1 · response
Published 10 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install a TSRGD 515.1 chevron sign on the new lighting column to highlight the road’s 90-degree alignment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that following the incident:”

Source location

Response from Bradford Council
Page 1 · response
Published 10 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install a TSRGD 512 “Left Bend Ahead” warning sign on the left-hand side of Dryden Street.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that following the incident:”

Source location

Response from Bradford Council
Page 1 · response
Published 10 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Extreme speeding and intoxication make it uncertain that additional measures would have materially altered the collision outcome.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It should be noted that TSRGD 512 and 515.1 signs are generally reserved for higher-speed environments, where the prevalence of bends presents a demonstrable collision risk. National guidance, through TSRGD and the Traffic Signs Manual, cautions against unnecessary proliferation of such signs in 30 mph urban settings to avoid street clutter and the risk of driver desensitisation at locations where warning signs are most critical.”

Source location

Response from Bradford Council
Page 1 · response
Published 10 March 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026