PFD report

Jan Michael RACIBORSKI · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Jan 2025•Berkshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to properly record risk assessment details
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable documentation of safety risk assessments
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Discuss risk assessment and documentation during CPA discharge discussions.

    Stated by Oxford Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 January 2025.
  2. Action

    Use a clinical audit tool to assess records against risk-assessment and risk-management documentation standards.

    Stated by Oxford Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 January 2025.
  3. Action

    Complete spot checks of clinical notes focused on the reported recording concerns.

    Stated by Oxford Health NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 January 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to properly record risk assessment details

Wider context from the report

“None of the records of contact with Mr Raciborski completed by the AMHT in the period from August 2023 to the date of Mr Raciborski’s death contained any written record of a risk assessment. I found that in Mr Raciborski’s case this absence did not impact his treatment and was not causative factor. However my concern is that the failure to properly record the details of a risk assessment can lead to inadequate information sharing and the possibility of someone who relies upon the records gaining the wrong impression. In addition it does not allow the adequacy of the risk assessments to be properly investigated and could hinder investigations into deaths; which mean that a matter giving rise to a risk to life may not be identified in future investigations. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable documentation of safety risk assessments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss risk assessment and documentation during CPA discharge discussions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The team manager of the South Oxon Adult Mental Health Team also attended court on the first day of Mr Raciborski’s inquest and has subsequently listened to the audio recording of your summing up and findings of fact on the second day. The team manager’s attendance at the inquest in order to listen to the evidence provided further valuable insight into the contacts that the AMHT had with Mr Raciborski. Following the conclusion of the inquest, the team manager has taken local actions in relation to your concerns including (a) all supervisors in”

Source location

Response from Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use a clinical audit tool to assess records against risk-assessment and risk-management documentation standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust Core Clinical Standards in Mental Health and Learning Disability Care Policy gives colleagues guidance and direction as to the requirements and recording of risk assessment and information for both inpatient and community settings. We developed a clinical audit tool in the autumn of 2024 in order to check patient records against the policy and the standards to which we aspire. The tool reviews the following areas relating to the recording of risk information:”

Source location

Response from Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete spot checks of clinical notes focused on the reported recording concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“the Wallingford, Henley and Thame service are attending supervision training to refresh skills and she has asked that this is extended to all of the teams in South Oxfordshire and (b) a meeting in relation to CPA discharge discussions, within which the team discussed risk and how to document assessments of risk. The team manager will also complete spot checks of clinical notes with a focus on the concerns that you identified.”

Source location

Response from Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Extend supervision training to all South Oxfordshire teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“the Wallingford, Henley and Thame service are attending supervision training to refresh skills and she has asked that this is extended to all of the teams in South Oxfordshire and (b) a meeting in relation to CPA discharge discussions, within which the team discussed risk and how to document assessments of risk. The team manager will also complete spot checks of clinical notes with a focus on the concerns that you identified.”

Source location

Response from Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Attend supervision training to refresh risk-assessment and documentation skills.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The team manager of the South Oxon Adult Mental Health Team also attended court on the first day of Mr Raciborski’s inquest and has subsequently listened to the audio recording of your summing up and findings of fact on the second day. The team manager’s attendance at the inquest in order to listen to the evidence provided further valuable insight into the contacts that the AMHT had with Mr Raciborski. Following the conclusion of the inquest, the team manager has taken local actions in relation to your concerns including (a) all supervisors in”

Source location

Response from Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ask the CRAM policy owner to consider whether an earlier policy review is required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust’s Clinical Risk Assessment and Management (CRAM) Policy sets out the standards for assessment, formulation and recording of risk assessment. The policy was most recently updated in February 2023 and is due for next review in February 2026. I have asked the CRAM policy owner to consider if an earlier review is required, given your concerns.”

Source location

Response from Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026