PFD report

JAMES EDWARD TURNER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Sep 2024•Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Road safety hazards at the collision location
  2. Failure to implement road safety recommendations at the collision location
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to implement identified safety actions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Erect warning signs indicating farm traffic at the access.

    Stated by Cornwall CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 October 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The authority has no power to require closure or relocation of the privately owned access.

    Stated by Cornwall CouncilOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Road safety hazards at the collision location

Wider context from the report

“(1) Road safety at the location of the collision taking account of • the speed limit at the location, • the limited visibility for tractor drivers, • the nature of the tractor loads being conveyed at the collision site and the time it takes for combinations to cross the road, • the data that indicates some motorists are speeding at that location. (2) The fact that the recommendations made by the Council to improve road safety at the collision location have not been implemented. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to implement road safety recommendations at the collision location

Wider context from the report

“(1) Road safety at the location of the collision taking account of • the speed limit at the location, • the limited visibility for tractor drivers, • the nature of the tractor loads being conveyed at the collision site and the time it takes for combinations to cross the road, • the data that indicates some motorists are speeding at that location. (2) The fact that the recommendations made by the Council to improve road safety at the collision location have not been implemented. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to implement identified safety actions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Erect warning signs indicating farm traffic at the access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm our contractor has been instructed and that warning signs indicating 'Farm Traffic' (diagram 553.1 & 553.2) will be erected shortly.”

Source location

Response from Cornwall Council
Page 1 · response
Published 1 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The authority has no power to require closure or relocation of the privately owned access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The highway authority's view remains that relocating the access is the best long-term preventative measure, given the limited view out of the field. As noted at the inquest, however, Cornwall Council has no power to require closure or relocation of the access, which is privately owned and has been in use for many years. We are though willing to work with the landowner on potential relocation options and would be grateful to be advised of any response Mr Harper makes to his own copy of your R28 letter.”

Source location

Response from Cornwall Council
Page 1 · response
Published 1 October 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026