PFD report

Georgia Polydorou · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Mar 2018•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to communicate the significance of post-fall deterioration signs to patients’ interpreters or carers
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deteriorationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable post-fall assessment and clinical response
  2. Failure to provide timely CT scanning after falls in elderly patients taking blood-thinning medications
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely access to clinically indicated CT scanningPart of recurring concern: Unreliable post-fall assessment and clinical response
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Take the issues into account when the relevant guideline areas are next reviewed.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 June 2018.
  2. Action

    Log the concerns with the NICE guideline surveillance team for consideration in ongoing surveillance.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 June 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing VTE and head-injury guidelines appropriately reflect available evidence and do not require amendment at this time.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate the significance of post-fall deterioration signs to patients’ interpreters or carers

Wider context from the report

“(3) Mrs Polydorou’s first language was Greek. Witnesses described her ability to converse in English as “basic”. Whilst in A&E, her son acted as an interpreter in order to obtain a reliable history. Following the fall, it was decided that Mrs Polydorou would have a CT scan if she showed signs of deterioration such as headache, bleeding, dizziness or vomiting. Mrs Polydorou’s son, ████████ was told that his mother had fallen but was not told of the significance that may indicate that her condition was deteriorating. During a visit on 10 July, Mrs Polydorou told her son that she had a headache but he did not realise the potential significance of this. Mrs Polydorou did not report her headache to medical staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration; Unreliable post-fall assessment and clinical response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide timely CT scanning after falls in elderly patients taking blood-thinning medications

Wider context from the report

“(1) Mrs Polydorou did not receive a CT scan within 8 hours of her fall because she had a Glasgow Coma Scale of 15/15, she did not have any abnormal neurological observations and was not taking Warfarin. Mrs Polydorou was concurrently taking aspirin, clopidogrel and enoxaparin during her hospital admission. All of which have the effect of thinning the blood. (2) Evidence from a consultant neurosurgeon established that there can be a significant delay in elderly patients showing signs of head injury following a fall, particularly where they are taking blood thinning medications. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely access to clinically indicated CT scanning; Unreliable post-fall assessment and clinical response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Take the issues into account when the relevant guideline areas are next reviewed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following our considerations, we believe both guidelines appropriately reflect the available evidence and do not need to be amended at this time. Nevertheless, the issues have been logged with the NICE guideline surveillance team, and will be taken into account when the guideline areas are next considered for review.”

Source location

2018-0079-Response-by-N.I.C.E
Page 2 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Log the concerns with the NICE guideline surveillance team for consideration in ongoing surveillance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following our considerations, we believe both guidelines appropriately reflect the available evidence and do not need to be amended at this time. Nevertheless, the issues have been logged with the NICE guideline surveillance team, and will be taken into account when the guideline areas are next considered for review.”

Source location

2018-0079-Response-by-N.I.C.E
Page 2 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing VTE and head-injury guidelines appropriately reflect available evidence and do not require amendment at this time.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We also have a guideline on the assessment and early management of head injury (CG176). This guideline includes recommendations on performing CT head scans in patients on warfarin (who have no other indications for CT head scan), reflecting the available evidence. The guideline developers considered there to be limited evidence regarding patients using other antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs within studies deriving or validating clinical decision rules for determining which patients need CT head scans - particularly, evidence in determining whether they are at increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage. The guideline developers therefore made a research recommendation on this issue.”

Source location

2018-0079-Response-by-N.I.C.E
Page 2 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Publish updated guideline covering hospital-acquired VTE risk assessment and pharmacological prophylaxis recommendations.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 June 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish updated guideline covering hospital-acquired VTE risk assessment and pharmacological prophylaxis recommendations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our guideline on venous thromboembolism in over 16s: reducing the risk of hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (NG89) was published earlier this month (updating and replacing an earlier guideline). It covers assessing and reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in people aged 16 and over in hospital.”

Source location

2018-0079-Response-by-N.I.C.E
Page 1 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026